Exciting stuff
I have very fond memories of the Apollo era. Fingers crossed for the upcoming tests
4257 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Apr 2007
Under MS-DOS, I typically used Norton Utilities' binary editor, and have at times managed to alter strings in executables and libraries in DOS, when access to the code was missing, or recompiling the whole shebang to correct a simple typo in the user interface took longer than performing the edits in code and executable or library. Under Windows, Wordpad could indeed be used.
Lapsang Souchong is great. I frequently have it in the afternoon, and then some colleagues think their computer might be overheating when I enter their offices, with my steaming mug of smokey Lapsang Souchong.
Keemun black teas have the advantage that they never turn bitter if you forget to take the infuser out of your mug.
Good manners help a lot in making everybody's life nicer. I almost always wear a hat, and doffing it politely when entering the plane always puts a smile on the faces of the cabin personnel welcoming you on board, and ditto on the way out. Didn't get any formal upgrades that way but have on occasion been given more leg room on the seat next to the emergency exit (I am told this may also be due to the fact that I have a fairly athletic build, so they assume I have the strength to operate the door)
Being nice to whoever is helping you costs nothing, and makes life much more bearable
Would that include the (roughly 8-10 micron wavelength) IR our body radiates? Oh, well, each photon has a far higher energy than those of 5G signals, so they are BOUND to be more damaging. So we should all avoid each other's proximity for fear of being exposed to body heat radiation. How would that affect procreation, I wonder. </sarcasm>
As a researcher working on image processing (including remote sensing) I must really wonder what they think this will achieve. The tools I develop for remote sensing aren't fundamentally different from those I work on in astronomical or medical applications, or document processing. After all, AI methods are supposed to be generic. In CNNs the real slog is getting enough high-quality ground-truth data. Thus, an export ban on a trained neural network for an application might just work (not likely), but a ban on the generic code itself is hardly going to help, especially if you can buy it for e.g. document processing. And of course, there isn't an absolute shitload of code for these tasks available elsewhere, for free (<cough> GitHub <cough>).
I once built a really solid dimmer system for the pub I used to frequent, and before installing it, I wanted to make damned sure the wiring in the pub was up to standards. What I found in the basement was, let's say, interesting. Green and yellow wire = live, brown = neutral, blue = earth? No problem! Any other permutation? Equally likely.
Probably the same electrician
and will know when they will be needed before the users do. Nice idea on the face of it, but they will become prone to sulking in basements.
I'd better be going. Doffs hat (black fedora today) to the late, great Douglas Adams
Precisely! Furthermore, what is the well depth of pixels that small. The tiny pixel size must have an impact on dynamic range.
My DSLR has a pretty good 24 Mpixel sensor, on lots more silicon real estate, and with much bigger lenses attached. There is a reason I get much better images with that kit than I get with my phone (despite Leica optics). Under bright sunlight the phone gets good results, but in low light the bigger optics and sensor rule. The phone is of course more compact, but what is the point of recording 64 Mpixels when you are most likely only going to view them on at best a 4K display, and probably just your phone.
I'm going all misty-eyed with all these memories flooding back. I didn't miss the colour footage promised with Apollo 12, as all we had was a B&W TV anyway. I did watch the later missions with the Lunar Rover on our neighbours' colour TV and was stunned by the footage. My eldest son is a complete petrol head, and looks with disdain at electric cars (not noisy enough to his liking, I suppose), but I told him the coolest car EVER was electric. He asked me which car I meant, and I said "the Lunar Rover", and showed him some footage. He (grudgingly) had to agree. Kids these days
We still kept going, showing people live streams from Slooh, and playing my (very quick and dirty, and somewhat irregularly sampled) time lapse of the 2016 transit in a loop (on youtube right here). They also liked seeing the telescopes, and taking a tour of the observatory. I did manage to take some shots of the transit of Venus in 2004 on film. After scanning the results, I even managed a little time lapse shown here. The 2012 transit was clouded out.
I was working on my BSc thesis project at an Italian observatory in Switzerland, testing a new cryogenic IR spectrograph. First order every night was refill the liquid nitrogen and helium reservoirs in the dewar container of the instrument, before heading off to the observing control room. After that we needed to enter the coordinates of the object to observe (right ascension and declination, or RA and DEC) for short. Most of the objects were northern hemisphere objects, and were perfectly safe to observe, but one object was below the equator, and there were limits to which we were allowed to point the telescope downwards towards the horizon, in part due to the mechanics of the instrument, but also due to the fact that we might actually pour all the liquid nitrogen and helium out of the instrument, which wouldn't be a particularly good idea either. The engineer who built the instrument had worked out that this object, at DEC = -6 degrees plus a bit was just about at the limit of the specs of the instrument, but it should be safe.
I duly entered the coordinates, and the system replied with the coordinates entered, with the sensible question "Is this OK?" Until that fateful southern hemisphere object, I had always checked; found the data to be correct, and entered "Y", to which the system responded with a cheery "Then I go!", and pointed the scope at the desired object. This time I noticed I had accidentally entered DEC= -16 degrees plus a bit. Therefore I entered "N", and was horrified to get the response "Then I go!". I turned to one of the Italians on duty to ask how the hell I could stop this, and why the hell the program had ignored my "N". He replid that the system would accept essentially all input as "Yes", except Ctrl-D. The only option to stop it after the "Then I go!" was to enter new coordinates and press "Y" (or any key that chose your fancy). We rushed upstairs to the telescope, but found that the extra 10 degree rotation hadn't damaged anything, but I felt rather shaken that I might have trashed a several million guilder (at the time) instrument, let alone several years work, all because of, let us say, substandard UI design.