Re: Can we get an endorsement from his wife or girlfriend?
With jokes like that I doubt it.
1593 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jun 2014
No, no, no. It is in the first line " ... but its customers will still have to opt out ... "
I think he is making the assessment using the Duckworth-Lewis method because I don't understand why it is not "Disappointing that Verizon were not forced to make the tracking opt-in."
"Proof that you have the apparatus and capability to do so will no more result in a conviction than proof that you have the apparatus and capability to kill someone would get you convicted of murder."
You, Sir, have touching faith in the Magistrates who can be massively pragmatic when adjudicating.
Do the companies supplying these platforms offer seminars in, say, The Bahamas for users or sales prospects? Only a subset of teachers would be seduced but then they become ambassadors for the product. Introduce three new schools and get an invitation to Mathletics 2017 in Las Vegas or whatever.
It is a sales model that works in many many spheres.
Of course I am confident that much time will be spent at the seminar explaining the security model, why https is not required and how they have fully mitigated Flash vulnerabilities. (Event held in a cellar, beware of the leopard ... you get the picture.)
I have noticed a trend for one or two of the lavatories to be out of order during flights on several airlines. I suspect it is cost cutting by reducing cleaning costs and, more importantly, turn round times. The "out of order" lavatories are clean and can be used on the return flight.
I don't fly often enough to make a study and come to a significant conclusion. Anyone know if I am correct?
In the UK there are many who can force entry without a warrant or court order. Most notable are the Customs and Excise bit of HMRC. The list also includes such as gas engineers and disease control personnel. I expect there are similar powers in the USA.
A gas engineer may not have the power of arrest (over and above a normal citizen) but Customs and Excise certainly do search and arrest after simply turning up and demanding entry. I suspect that the disease control personnel may detain with out arrest if required to prevent spread of disease (probably constrained by the need for retrospective court action).
Letting your fingers dance over Google or Wikipedia will get a more definitive answer and a longer list.
From the Guardian 22 January 2013: "Ministers give Whitehall departments two years to decide which of the 1,300 remaining entry powers should be repealed"
Replying to my own post, I'll be up-voting me next.
Thinking of the utility (as a non-pilot) of the dazzle weapon its intent is not to temporarily or permanently blind the pilot. If you are polling along at 300 knots over San Carlos Water Jolly Jack Tar is going to be throwing everything he has at you. (Including, according to one hearsay verbal report, a NAAFI pork pie.) Thus the pilot is going to be as low as he dares to avoid the more effective AA - Seacat etc. Dazzle him for even a short time and the instinctive reaction will be to pull up, exposing him to more effective fire. Equally, stick down would be a win for us.
Perhaps Lester knows more?
There is a reason why patent agents get big bucks. My draft may, quite reasonably, say "Hit it with a hammer." This opens up the method of "Hit it with a mallet." As a result the process may be described "Give the part an impulse." Over-broad?
It beats having to fight:
Hit it with a shoe.
Hit it with a brick.
Hit it with a club.
Drop it on a hard surface.
etc.
I have a touching confidence that in the UK the judge could differentiate between reasonable differences in method and taking the Michael.
AC,
I am well aware of the reason and the tribal nature of human society. That is not a justification for what seems to be a particularly pernicious system. Work hard in the UK and you will be accepted by most of society even if you do not leave your roots behind. A Dalit is always a Dalit and a Brahmin always a Brahmin.
" ... little johnny couldn't register their account on Xmas morning ... "
The ignoratti at work. It used to be toys that needed batteries that couldn't be used on Christmas day. I know, and you know, that to provide the full gift experience for your young friend the toy* will need to be registered and this is best done beforehand, not while the rest of the world is trying to access the web (new tablets, mobiles, etc given as gifts). It will also mean that you can control the information revealed.
* Toy = surveillance device and I am glad that I no longer have responsibility for keeping specific children safe online. Regarded as the most technically competent member by my family I am never the less a dinosaur who should wear a tin foil hat.
I have to take issue with you Voyna, some of the brightest and most effective engineers and scientist I have worked with have been part of the Civil Service. Like the lands where the Jumblies live they are far and few but, in my experience, more common than in industry but less than in academia. I think that is just a product of the relative number and my skewed job experience. But, please, don't write off all civil servants, some are doing their best when beset by the slings and arrows of political expediency and the dead hand of a fearfully mediocre majority.
"and sentencing has historically been left to our independent judiciary, not crowd-pleasing politicians."
The crowd-pleasing politicians make the law and set min and max sentences for various crimes. Guideline are also issued for a more nuanced decision by the Judge. Mandatory custodial sentences for knife crime is an example.
The judiciary may be independent (a good thing) but must act within constraints.
(UK, not sure about the rest of the world.)