The six-week consultation closes on 10 November...
...at the moment the clocks strike thirteen.
3354 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Sep 2013
The solution is probably to bury a wire in the road - it seems a bizarre idea to want to replace human drivers with machines but leave in place the infrastructure that machines struggle to process.
However, it is interesting that we seem prepared to accept a much greater degree of carnage provided it originates from people like ourselves. Speed limits, seat belts and alcohol-testing were all the subject of strong opposition despite burgeoning road fatalities. Yet if a professional driver causes an accident, there is an outcry. And as for a machine... Autonomous vehicles will have as much trouble negotiating the double standards as they will the road network.
I find that hard to believe. I used to be obliged to write a lot of 100+ page documents with tables, figures and cross-references and I never found a version of Word that would not randomly corrupt page numbers, headings, ToCs, formatting and cross references.
And the reason for that is largely that Microsoft wanted Word to (a) do everything and (b) be compatible with poorly-designed previous versions. I think it's a good thing that Microsoft have realised that they can't do everything, can't be in every space in the market and can't ignore a growing diversity in the ecosystem. The real problem is that they need to identify things they can do well and do them better whereas they are simply shedding the increasing number of things at which they're failing.
I think they'll have to change the name. I assumed it was some sort of defence against screwdriving.
You've got to careful of ageing radios.
If you've ever used a minicab in London, I think you'd realise that the bar is set fairly low. If you look at Uber's business practices around the world it would appear they've actually put considerably more effort into finding ways of evading regulation than would have been required to comply: that would be the action of a psycopath, not a victim.
Let me rephrase that for you.
Isn't it better to have the economic interests of a secretive international conglomerate determine the information to which you have access ... ?
I suppose it depends on whether you think it's social progress to hope that those less blessed with literary and physical skills will be content to be distracted by cat videos and the miracle of light that can be turned on and off at will.
where have we seen that before
Given that an entire website is required to explain what browser features are supported in different browsers and to what extent - it's clear that "what we have seen before" is to product designers what videos of extreme violence are to jihadists.
It's effectively the same attitude as that of the UK - the Scots don't get a referendum without the permission of Westminster.
The difference is that Westminster has said yes, twice, and is being asked to say yes for a third time. So, clearly, the demos don't get to make a final decision whether a referendum is held or not.
I mean, it's how it should be, right?
Not unless you consider it a good use of the "big back end system" to be taking an interrupt for every character typed and keeping a map of the screen contents so that it can redraw it when the noisy and unreliable async connections suffers a parity error. And, indeed, be intimately bound to the minutiate of the user interface.
The whole point of multi-tier systems is for each layer to do what it does most efficiently and appropriately in such a way that it can be swapped out without the adjacent layers noticing if and when it becomes necessary.
If you're going to implement code with hard-to-maintian and short-lived technology, it's at least marginally better that it isn't built into the back-end logic too.
Incidentally, since you mention VT-100s and their ilk, the terminal driver was the most complex part of the RSX operating system and even minor patches tended to cause chaos as nearly every character-based UI depended on some undocumented behaviour or another and would break randomly if something changed. That's the downside of monolithic systems.
if I asked for the salary this tool quoted me in an interview, I'd be laughed out of the building
Interestingly, the more skills you add, the lower the salary seems to get - though not by much.
And on my tablet the site seemed very reluctant to let me add more roles or skills without pressing submit and back for each addition. Perhaps they're not paying their developers enough...
treat them like plumbers
Judging by the number of irritating minor problems in the plumbing of my new house, I'd swear it had been installed by IT staff. Fortunately, plumbing is mostly open source and you can fix it yourself, which is more that can be said for the credit oligarchyindustry.
The real problem is actually that IT staff pass themselves off as engineers when they really don't understand the meaning of the term. Many of them work on the same principle as plumbers - take a bunch of manufactured components and connect them all together - but have less understanding of what each component actually does, let alone how they will act together as a system. If management understood that most IT staff shouldn't be trusted to deliver secure solutions (partly because generations of IT staff before them have built incredibly shoddy foundations) they might be a bit more cautious in their ambitions.
Never, ever, upgrade to version X.0.
Especially an OS that explicitly prevents you from rolling back to a working version.
... is that none of it apparently has anything to do with whether there is an anti-trust case to answer. Who or what might have caused the FTC to start investigating doesn't seem to have any relevance to what they might subsequently have found and any prosecution would presumably depend only on evidence available to the court.
I've been offered a number of security jobs and on closer examination they all turned out to involve form-filling, box-ticking and writing screeds of arse-covering documentation. It's not really the kind of job that anyone would actually want, particularly if they're going to be the sacrificial goat when the inevitable happens.
What's the solution? The only ultimate solution is to have less vulnerable systems: there are going to be orders of magnitude more of them and they're going to be increasingly critical to the maintenance of life and it's simply untenable for them all to require their own Praetorian Guard.
Simply changing the law so those EULA clauses about limited liability have no validity would rapidly change the landscape.
By the time Big Ben strikes midnight on March 31st 2219
Perhaps it would make more sense to get 1400 physicists to work out how to project Big Ben into space at sufficient velocity to give us down here an extra couple of centuries to work it all out. They're already dismantling it: shame not to take advantage of the opportunity.
greybeards have already treated themselves to a pricey audio recorder
Musicians of all ages buy audio recorders in quite significant numbers - for rehearsal and to record (their own) concerts. Non-musicians buy them to record concerts (other people's). I'd be very pleased to get access to HAAC recording because even specialised audio recorders tend not to cope very well with high sound pressure levels or wide dynamic range - and you generally can't keep an eye on the levels if you're performing at the same time. I'm not entirely sure I'd want it in an expensive phone - one that's a tempting target for the light-fingered while it's outside your immediate control, but having it in a mid-range phone would be very convenient - something less to carry.
I did consider getting a Lumia for that specific purpose - but the combination of fixed internal storage and firmware updates that successively crippled the audio capabilities knocked that on the head.
The Ffrees Card and associated Ffrees Account is an electronic money product and although it is a product regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, it is not covered by the Financial Services Compensation Scheme. No other compensation scheme exists to cover losses claimed in connection with the Ffrees Card and associated Ffrees Account. We will however ensure that any funds received by you are held in a segregated account so that should we become insolvent your funds will be protected against claims made by our creditors.
and:
It’s no longer possible to sign up for a new Ffrees Account
Probably just as well.
I've probably said it before in a similar discussion, but your best bet is probably the smart ceiling rose - assuming you want such a thing. At least as houses are presently wired, there is no permanent power at the switch, which makes it a bit hard to embed smarts - the IKEA stuff mostly uses battery-powered (button cell) controllers, which seems like a retrograde step.
Having just moved to a house with one central ceiling light in a large living room, I'd quite like to be able to install some additional lighting without tearing the walls and ceiling apart to add more cables and switches and having individually controllable lights on a ceiling track (for example) would be quite useful. However, I intend to live here for rather longer than any smart lighting system control app is likely to be maintained and today's generation of lightbulbs is likely to be availalble and I notice that the TRÅDFRI Android app has decidedly mixed reviews. Having previously had an X10 system for more than a decade that I could operate with the TV remote, this does seem like a step backwards.
It's what's happening to the world that's of rather more consequence: this is just overspill.
It's not just the Trump US and Brexit Britain, Poland is shredding its constitution, Hungary has more or less finished shredding theirs and is about to militarize its schools - and we know what's happening in Russia and Turkey.
And whatever anyone says about the US rust belt or Britain's disaffected urban north or the white working class, they're not the people funding the right wing "news" sites and the targeted social media campaigns - a very small nexus of extremely wealthy people are doing that in the UK and Britain and we don't know to what extent foreign governments are doing the same.
It only takes a relatively small number of people to redefine "normal": the balance of opinions of the modest cohort of regular commentards here can easily be upset by a dozen or so determinedly active zealots. Analysis of the source of much more widely-read Facebook frothings suggests that they are being promoted by a handful of very active accounts.
What has happened is that we have built technology which, coupled with a human psychological tendency to outrage, is acting as an amplifier of opinions with a response curve that emphasises idiocy. The Internet is the Beats headphone of opinion reproduction - it's the bottom end that's prominent.
What can we do about it? Following the money would be a start. I'm sure there's enough potential outrage to be spawned that way to drown out the malevolent prospectus of the super-rich.
He is setting a very good example
Well, of course it isn't as if Trump has changed since they agreed to serve - they all knew who they were going to be dealing with.
Cynically (me, them, or both?), I might suggest that they had realised that Trump's economic policy is heading for the buffers and that they couldn't pass up an opportunity to jump off without being accused of abandoning their fellow passengers to their fate.