I blame the source code management...
Typing "git" constantly can't to anything for the civility of your general demeanour.
Perhaps it could be rebranded "pet" or "luv"?
3354 publicly visible posts • joined 6 Sep 2013
One of the many things I don't understand is why, having chosen to leave the EU, the people who advocated leaving are choosing to characterise the consequences of leaving as "punishment". This is what we asked for and it seems to be what we're getting. Why isn't that being welcomed by those who wanted it most?
demanding more votes until the "correct" result is returned is unreasonable
By that logic, we might as well not have elections at all and stick with the government we've got for ever more. Mind you, given that both the present government and opposition are essentially so riven by internal divisions as to be completely ineffective, I can see the merit in your proposition.
I found myself asking that question when I went to view Stephenson's Rocket at the Almost-imperceptible Exhibition of the North. Clearly concerned that visitors might not be sufficiently impressed by the skeletal remains of a piece of engineering history, long since cannibalised for its reusable parts, organisers had provided a "Virtual Reality Experience" that promised the opportunity to:
Travel back to 1829 via virtual reality to experience the sight and sound of the early steam age as Stephenson’s Rocket is digitally brought back to life.
What is actually consisted of was a first-person view of a simulated trip down a seemingly American railroad line, while a modern city sprang up on each side of the track. With a silhouette of the Rocket pasted across the front as if it were being observed by a disembodied head welded to the top of the boiler.
When I pointed that out to the attendants, their response was that, although they'd watched it on several occasions, they'd never noticed the complete absence of the 19th Century or the UK and its tradition of trains travelling on the left, like the cars.
Conclusion: people expect crap, so just give it to them. Fortunately, it doesn't seem to be the policy of the Discovery Museum to thwack 'em in the balls if they complain, though I would be unsurprised if the hardware has the capability: I'm sure more clients will be demanding it.
You can't compare them
You can: they both perform a basic primary function at a cost orders of magnitude greater than is necessitated by their purpose. Why they cost more is irrelevant. The reason people pay the increased cost is much the same.
If you keep you Rolex serviced...
...you will merely add to its inflated lifetime cost.
I'm very tired of that old chestnut - the best way to achieve that would be to lock us all up for our own protection.
And given that successive British governments have covered up renditions, torture, extra-judicial killings, undercover police malpractice whilst simultaneously crying "nanny state" whenever there is an attempt to deal with alcohol abuse, smoking or obesity, politicians clearly don't believe it either.
Maybe they should lock themselves up for our own protection.
I realise I'm a data point of exactly one - and not, as far as I know, a friend of the original poster, but I exercise and don't have any kind of fad-device, in much the same way as I've exercised for the last 50-odd years. I can exercise perfectly well without knowing my exact heart rate, having an inaccurate assessment of the number of steps I might have taken or needing to plot my run or ride on a map.
Having a "fitness" device seems to serve the same "need" as taking pictures of your lunch...
If someone said "yes", could you believe the answer?
Not that a "secure enclave" is necessarily something to fear, any more than a DMA controller (which could just as easily be exfiltrating your data) is inherently something to fear - but basically, if someone other than you has control of the hardware design, then what they "allow you to know" is very much at their discretion.
There are several applications that claim to do that for Linux - can't seem to get any of them to work over bluetooth on Ubuntu LTS. A long time ago I had a simple problem with MacOS that would support some phones, but not others. I suppose having the cloud in the middle solves the problem of buggy local communication - while adding dollops of slurp potential for good measure.
If you use the terminology machine learning algorithm, it's not a surprise. When it gets labelled artificial intelligence there's somehow an increased tendency to assume, erroneously, that the results will be free of human bias. There does seem to be an enthusiasm right now to over-sell the capabilities of machine learning.
I think that's just the flip side of "but over the Internet" patents: if the service to the end user is essentially the same, the specific technology should not be an isssue. Regulation of the phone service survived the demise of Strowger exchanges and the introduction of fibre trunk connections; adding some packet-switching is a fairly trivial difference by comparison. If you're selling it as a phone service, it's a phone service.
privacy-raping at OS level
Having just acquired a new Windows 10 laptop (on which Windows 7 won't easily run), it's the bloody patronising advertising that I find most annoying - "helpful" suggestions, presumably paid for, turning up in the start menu for software I don't want & blandishments about registering for "Microsoft Rewards" on the lock screen. These can all be turned off, with a myriad of different controls in different places, though the control to disable Cortana is now gone (apart from the registry hack). Except the day after I did, the major update to the factory image finally downloaded, occupied a vast amount of disk space and turned back on everything I'd turned off.
It's not an OS any longer - a way for you to run application software on your computer. It's a platform to allow application software to run you, once you've been beaten into dumbed-down submission. I don't want it. Nobody over the age of 12 could possibly want it.
I'll also be moving to Windows 7 in a server VM for legacy applications and Linux on the laptop where RDP will offer the occasional backward glance.
What more do you want?
As I understand it, NAT64 provides a means for a host with an IPv6 stack to communicate with legacy IPv4-only hosts by means of a gateway. I gave up trying to pin down the shifting sands of IPv6 migration some time ago, so please correct me if any of the following is untrue regarding NAT64.
1/ it needs a specific form of address allocation for the local IPv6 network, the host needs to "know" when to embed IPv4 addresses in IPv6 packets and the gateway has to "know" what to do with them so it effectively adds a third mode of operation (IPv4, IPv6 and IPv4 in IPv6).
2/ It does nothing for the problem of IPv4-only hosts (either legacy systems or system sitting behind an IPv4 ISP) that want to communicate with IPv6-only systems, which would seem potentially to be a significantly greater number.
No value that I've noticed.
I've just replaced an old Moto G (which was about £120 a few year back) with an Honor 9 Lite (£140) and I couldn't see any value at all in spending any more money. I'd need some considerable persuasion to be convinced that a £900 phone offered me a more-than-sixfold increase in utility.
Indeed.
And what would seem to be the biggest problem is that you can't selectively untrain parts of the model, as far as I'm aware. If there's an irrelevant feature in the source images that happens accidentally to correlate with the presence of another feature then the model is always going to have a correlation bias and even if you detect it (which often you won't), you can't get rid of it without retraining the entire model from source images from which the irrelevant feature has been removed.
That alone should be sufficient to refute the claim that "intelligence" of any form is in play here.
Says the man who took part in a staged "interview" with an actress whose support for Corbyn is so democratically balanced that she said in The Guardian:
Terrible thing to say. But we need a coup!
I reached much the same conclusion from watching an episode of CSI! I assume it's not the history of Mob corruption and violence, the 171 murders (excluding the 58 in the mass shooting) of 2017, the brutal climate, the permanent twilight of the casinos or the fact the entire town only exists to separate people from their money that makes it such a desirable destination. Because, if it is, DEF CON might as well pack up and go home: humanity has chosen a different path.
A graduate of (or clear willingness to complete) the IPA’s Major Projects Leadership Academy (MPLA)
Given the MPLA constists of "three, five-day residential modules delivered over a 12 month period interspersed with a demanding schedule of preparation and assignments", there's plenty of scope for a successful candidate to be away "on a course" at the critical moment.
I think the most important thing is that the mechanics of the delivery should be predictable: in the old days I knew I would have to make a trip to the parcel depot if I placed a telephone or online order and that was a factor in deciding whether to try to source the item locally.
I prefer to have items delivered to an Amazon locker as I don't have to be in (and there's no surcharge). My local locker is in a shopping centre that closes at 9pm. Amazon's next-day delivery, if it is in fact dispatched on time, is only guaranteed to arrive by 9pm, so the likelihood is that by the time the package is in the locker it's too late to collect it same day. Or, like the other day, Amazon logistics arrive at the shopping centre at 21.03 and claim they've "attempted delivery" when they know full well they've tried to access their own lockers when they're shut.
And that's not to mention an item recently that bounced backwards and forwards between the M4 corridor and West Yorkshire for a week before finally emerging in the right place.
There's a whole range of smaller items that are either sold by or fulfilled by Amazon (audio cables, for example) that are not deliverable to lockers: try and you get a message saying the locker is "full", even if it clearly isn't full for much larger items in your order. So you have to order those for home delivery, hoping they come by post and not on an Amazon van as they won't just put the order through your letter box.
And if you have Prime and you want to place an order but are going to be away for a couple of days, it appears the slower delivery options are not available to you, so you have to go to the inconvenience of diarising your future order for your return.
It would be a great step forward if Amazon had an option to guarantee delivery by Royal Mail - at least I know when the postman arrives each day. Everything else seems to be a lottery.
nobody should be expecting to rely on the hardware
My first thought on reading that was to cry "rubbish", but I think you have a valid point.
I don't think it's impossible to have a verifiably secure shared execution environment, but its price/performance is unlikely to be attractive. We haven't really thought the whole cloud idea through thoroughly enough: the economics of sharing look superficially attractive, but the security issues have largely been taken on trust. And, indeed, VMs have been used in the cloud because the technology was there, not because they were necessarily the best solution to the sharing problem.
For large users, the problem is mostly immaterial - you'll be wanting multiple dedicated machines (or at least dedicated for the time they are provisioned). For small users, or for some types of scalability, throwing lambda functions at random compute engines may well be a better model than fractional virtual machines.
I'd be surprised if Mrs Dawn Stabb (who sounds like someone to avoid in the wee small hours) had actually typed the letter herself - presumably they have some boilerplate text somehwere.
In fact it looks a bit to me as if the boilerplate text was moved from their old system to the new one by OCR from a printed copy. Could explain a lot...