Re: Best plan
And after one experience with that at one job I sign all my commits and turn on checks for that everywhere.
76 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Apr 2022
Trying to apply C++ ideas to Rust won't work, as evidenced by your last paragraph. Rust doesn't do exceptions, the default behavior isn't to terminate - that's only supposed to happen in case of irreversible bad state.
Acting like C++ with all the unnecessary shit it has is a requirement to develop large/GUI applications tells me you are not really arguing in good faith here.
For someone who tries to point out an apparent cult like behavior in people who care about FOSS, your incoherent babbling looks suspiciously close to a conspiracy theorist rant.
And if you think putting your code online with no license at all is anything more than wasted bandwidth then you only show you are too ignorant to participate in this discission.
I agree that MS provides a convenient option, but I can't understand how people didn't jump ship when they "modernized" the UI at some point while LibreOffice had an actually familiar interface.
Granted, MS fought very hard by making docx files hard to work with, but 90% of the population never used the features that didn't work.
MS users are doing it to themselves, even if alternatives are free, easy to find and better.
It's probably hybrid in the sense that the LMM parses the conversation but search is done using conventional means based on what the model gathered from the chat? That would be a sensible approach and what LMMs are generally good at.
The popular "write me an essay" LMMs are not able to do that because of the way they are built, that information is lost during vectorization, otherwise they'd have to annotate every other word. They don't persist knowledge, just linguistic probabilities.
I know the comment is old. But licenses are based on copyright. And the default is you have no right to do anything, then the license grants you some more or less limited rights.
If you are not allowed to resell or give away the work or derivative works it doesn't have to specify exactly that you can't train an LLM using it.
This. I don't understand why people still think this is a good idea. The whole point of 2FA is something I know and something I have - I was sure passkeys would give people an alternative to a hardware token, not replace passwords. While a passkey can't be phished, making it replace the password makes unauthorized physical access so much worse.
It's like having an SSH or GPG key without a password.
Though the "I lose the device and I lose access" part is already solved - put the passkey in a password manager that's synced (or in case of hardware keys have a second one).
Just use Go at that point, it's probably going to be better.
Slight correction, the guy who named it after himself apparently did it on company time/hardware and one of the rather litigious corporations owns the full copyright.
The irony of mentioning that after recommending Golang doesn't escape me of course :)
Maybe MS should stop calling SMS a real 2FA solution.
Passkeys are still software, while they might be better than passwords since they can't be easily phished or written down on a post-it, they don't replace real 2FA (not to mention they can't be transferred between vendors yet, so a nice way for MS to make sure you keep using Edge)
Issue of paid apps aside, did Apple get such a requirement?
Seems weird since even hosting the apks is definitely not free. Do they need to provide an API? How about updates? I'd rather be able to have a say where my app ends up given unhappy users will blame devs and not the store (as they already do with the mess that is Play Store sometimes).
What a load of crap. You don't need to stop everything and send people home to write code that doesn't introduce new bugs when you are fixing a bug. Have you not heard of version control? TDD?
Take some pride in your work instead of folding and doing whatever the suit with no clue says they want. I pity your coworkers.
If the alternative is opening more coal plants, plugging our ears and screaming "green coal" then what is there to talk about?
Until battery tech gets vastly more efficient (and less destructive for the environment) fully renewable solutions won't be able to provide base load for the grid.
That benefit is sadly one of the primary reasons FOSS maintainers burn out.
Also there should be forced audits, you'd be surprised how many times even senior programmers don't bother checking licenses and put (A)GPL code into proprietary software.
The cross platform widgets thing is kind of solved with the Suru QQC2 style on UT - it's just a QQC2 theme so the app can mostly work across desktop/KDE/UT with the same GUI. Sailfish is still doing it's own thing on an even more ancient version of Qt than UT (5.6 vs 5.12, both not officially supported anymore).
But yeah, Canonical not playing nice with others is the reason most of their ideas fail to be adopted (upstart, mirserver, snap) even if technically they aren't that bad.
Bold of you to assume you can speak for every Apple user out there. Not only are you repeating Apple's poor excuses, but also for some reason think people love the corporate policies so much they want them in their personal lives too?
No thanks, I can think for myself, I don't need the OEM to tell me what I can and cannot do with hardware I pay for. And if you prefer someone to think for you, nobody is forcing you to use other app stores or install software from the web.
Btw you realize that a sandbox is the only thing keeping you "safe" while you browse the web, right?
Planning is all waterfall is good for. Keeps management busy and thinking they are productive. And then comes the execution and the realization that half of the plan is backwards and none of the timelines are realistic. A year later the project is over time, over budget and needs to be planned again because market changed and it needs different features.
Though the religion of scrum is not better :)