From: Apollo ALSEP
Re: Seismograph reading
BONNNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGGG!
1001 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Mar 2022
It may be (at best, circumstantial) evidence if and only if someone takes their phone with them every single time they leave their home, except when they're observed doing something nefarious.
I leave my home without my phone all the time, and so the only evidentiary value of that act is that I don't want to make or receive phone calls or text messages.
That was the Genius's plan. That was his whole plan.
Sadly, yes. Compare what he and Harris said about health care in the presidential debate, and weep.
Mango Largo will be older in his 4th year of his 2nd presidency than Joe Biden was when he left office. Decrepitude is upon him already, for anyone with observance enough to see the signs. His career has been showmanship throughout; anything solid accomplished in his name was outsourced. Anything the US government used to do is about to be either demolished or outsourced.
The likes of F. Elon Musk are the ones who recognised the power vacuum early. We have already seen the intent of the people who now hold the real power.
Turbine powered cars are not a new thing, they've been around since the 50s. I've wondered about a turbine-electric hybrid, with electric at the low end and then combined generation and propulsion when in highway mode. Seems like a good match of power and efficiency.
Ultimately, most conventional base load generation is turbine powered.
Singapore is an international business hub. Major US and European companies have significant operations here. Nvidia has explained that many of these customers use their business entities in Singapore to purchase chips for products destined for the US and other Western countries.
[There] is no reason to believe that DeepSeek obtained any export-controlled products from Singapore. We expect US companies, like Nvidia, to comply with US export controls and our domestic legislation.
Our customs and law enforcement agencies will continue to work closely with their US counterparts. We have always upheld the rule of law, and acted decisively and firmly against individuals and companies that flout the rules.
How carefully did the SG government write those three paragraphs? A non-denial denial if ever I read one. They might as well have said "You might very well think that. I couldn't possibly comment," and left it at that. Whoever wrote that last bit hasn't read the Panama Papers.
Climate science includes things like core sampling of Antarctic ice to analyse entrapped atmospheric gas and other analogues of climate. So records in this context includes the physical record, which goes back thousands of years, as well as the direct observation record.
Considering how many of the causes of these problems have involved wealth- and resource-transfers out of third-world countries, I would say reversing the moral obligation is fair.
I live in a rich industrialised country that has given a binding undertaking to Tuvalu (entirely less than 5m above sea level) that its citizens will be able to emigrate permanently in the event their country is inundated. At least drowning won't be a problem, but the loss of culture and social cohesion will likely be irreparable.
What is the Middle East going to do with the population of the Nile delta? South Asia with the population of the Ganges delta? Europe with the Netherlands? The USA with the population of Miami? The cost of installing AC is going to be the least of this planet's problems.
You have the Supreme Court's interpretation of what freedom of speech and the Constitution are. And when you're hitched to a wagon being pulled by the likes of Thomas, Alito, Gorsuch and Barrett, you can predict which direction you'll go and I don't think it's the one you want.
That's a thorough explanation of the journalistic coverage of the gesture, and thanks for it.
But Musk more than just about anyone is a man driven by public perception. He's rich mostly because his share of Tesla is so valuable, and (by market standards) that's quite out of proportion to its actual profit-generating ability. If people stop buying Teslas because of the perception that to do so supports anything on the far right, like maybe climate change denial, Tesla's profitability and therefore its share market value goes straight in the toilet
He hasn't denied his intent was fascist. He has only criticised people who described his gestures as such, not refuted them. He has had the means and opportunity to prove people calling him a fascist wrong, and he has chosen not to.
For the last eighty years anyone making that gesture in a political context has had a far-right intent. Unless he states unambiguously that white supremacism, anti-Semitism, belligerent nationalism, contempt for the rule of law, and all the paraphernalia of far-right extremism are wrong, he is content to have any thoughtful person who judges him by his actions believe that he thinks they're ok.
If Google, Micros~1, and Apple are so convinced that users will be so enamored of this Automated Idiocy that they can force it down the throats of their users, sometimes for a fee, let the market decide.
One market they cannot afford to lose is academia. If you can't convince the college-educated that your products are essential, they won't be: not for universities, then not for corporate, and ultimately not for consumers in general. That is a big part of how they became so integrated in society in the first place (see: history of computing; history of the internet).
If however as a matter of policy, universities enforced a blanket ban on AI-assisted (read: plagiarised) content, you will convince those markets of the reality, that AI is dodgy at best, dangerous at worst.
Students should have work rejected if it was created on an AI assisted platform. Otherwise there is no way to tell if it is the student's work. Either that or oblige the software to metadata any AI-contribution with the Mark of the Beast.
Ultimately I think academia will be forced into having faculty compose their work on in-house web-served office suites which can tell if the content is being typed in real time by someone with human-like entry characteristics and not simply cut-and-pasted from ChatGPT or the like.
Will Apple / Micros~1 / Google build such software? I doubt it. Does it already exist on FOSS platforms? If it doesn't, it will, and right soon. Supply and demand.
Si mundus vult decipi, decipiatur..
Augustine had a religion to spread when he said that. AI is just about the value-add profiteering. I just want my devices to do what I tell them, so constantly find myself yelling at them "You're not smart enough to help!"
Even with AI bolted into the OS infrastructure, they won't be.
The people who call themselves tough on crime know the crime they want toughness against when they see it, and this ain't it.
Walking past someone's front door while African American in Florida, that's the sort of crime that needs someone to be tough on. Lethal force authorised.
All the crimes that Mango Largo just pardoned - not really crime.
What really offends the tech bros was the fact that some part of the sentence was deterrence: Anyone else tries this, look what you'll get. Now, under 47, the gates aren't just unlocked, but wide open.