My God, You're the Inebriati!
Everything mankind does is much, much easier if you're ever so slightly drunk.
1013 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Mar 2022
The word advice in that comment covers a scandalous level of deception.
In seeking "efficiency", a series of right-wing governments in Australia fired much of the public service, only to replace the advice public servant experts used to give with advice provided by for-profit consultancies, of which KPMG were one. Many of these consultancies happened to be donors to the right wing parties.
These consultancies also had large numbers of corporate clients who used them to minimise their tax liabilities. When the government introduced new tax regulations, they included, on consultants' advice, loopholes which KPMG had already advised their clients to structure their finances to exploit.
Needless to say, Australian governments don't use KPMG any more.
ZFS is extremelyflexible: checksumming, compression, encryption, mirroring, duplication, deduplication, snapshots, extended attributes, case-sensitivity, cache optimisation, error detection, error correction, RAID... I'm struggling to find a single feature of modern filesystem function that you can't find in ZFS, that you could omit from your chosen ZFS if you like, by simply choosing not to use it.
Wrapping one's head around the implementation is a learning curve, but that's the cost of using its abilities. Unlike btrfs, in ZFS it's logical (or, at least, there is a logic to it). Oh, and it's stable and it works, too.
A GPL (rather than CDDL) ZFS would be possible, if and only if OpenZFS (or someone) were to audit and rewrite every line of Sun-engineered code in the codebase. Larry will tap you on the head with a lawyer if you get it wrong. Any takers?
Taint is just a scary pejorative chosen in this context to make ZFS users think thrice about not swallowing the Free Software dogma as a bolus.
Once you're fine with that idea, carry on...
My eyes flick over a page or block of text in a magazine as soon as I've clocked its identity and categorised it as "ad". I'm not modifying the magazine by refusing to read the text, I'm ignoring it.
Pihole does the same.
If your business model consists of identifying ads and substituting some other content you curate yourself and get paid to distribute, you're modifying it. Also, you're just another pitiful rent-seeking parasite.
You're happy for me to treat your STEMI without knowing what your angiogram results are? Informed consent requires me to tell you how much more likely that makes you to die; if you're happy to wait while I do that, fine. I'd rather get on with saving your life.
What did TPM 2.0 add to the fundamental security of an OS that 1.2 did not already achieve? It was new, and its rollout coincided with the most recent ISA extensions which requires a user to upgrade hardware.
Not so much complying with the latest safety and emissions standards, more like defining "all 4 wheels must be on the road at the same time" as a safety standard.
The UK has been reading other gentlemen's mail since before the UK was a thing (see Francis Walsingham). The quote about other people's mail came from an American, before WWI.
It was the UK's habit of intercepting and reading German diplomatic traffic (a habit I hear they've taken up themselves, quite regularly) that finally brought the USA into WWI. By decrypting the Zimmerman Telegram, and then "allowing" the US to discover its content, the Brits demonstrated Germany's intent to bring Mexico into WWI on the German side, and to thereby threaten the USA's own territory, aiming to discourage the Americans from using German attacks on neutral shipping as a casus belli. When President Wilson found out, war was declared.
Ironic, eh?
I read today that DOGE's next assignment, after implementing its AI-generated list of whom to fire (which included those who maintain the thermonuclear arsenal), will be an AI-generated list of laws to repeal.
I've got money on it including the one that bans private ownership of nuclear weapons, as that breaches the second amendment.
While I don't disagree with you, since the lowest common denominator of the designers of abstraction layers passed the point of "files and directories are a too abstract set of ideas for our target user, let's assume they can only cope with something more concrete that they're likely to understand from daily experience," the world did go to hell in a handbasket.
Passing through the US Border Security an Australian was asked to show the contents of a kid's backpack, and, removing a teddy, only occupant of the backpack, said "There's a bear in there." Her partner, being a comedian, added "And a chair as well."
For context, in Australia, the TV show Play School is a national institution, and its theme song, unchanged for 50 years, begins "There's a bear in there, and a chair as well." Practically everyone who grew up in Australia knows it by heart, because it's on twice a day, every day of the year, and for pre-schoolers viewing is pretty much compulsory.
Cue multiple officials grilling the entire family and searching every scrap of checked and hand luggage (not sure but in the original account I believe they missed their flight because of it). "What did you mean by a chair? Is there anything else in your luggage you haven't told us about? Are you attempting to take anything out of the country illegally?"
Depending on the story-teller, cavity searches may be part of the story. Possibly apocryphal, but absolutely credible.
/anecdote
It would stop the teaching of evolution as science and creationism as religion. It would stop sex education that teaches any method other than abstinence for contraception, despite abstinence being demonstrably worse at preventing teenage pregnancy even than no sex education at all. It would facilitate some states' already implemented plans to teach that 81.2 million < 74.2 million, as in the 2020 Presidential Election. To the extent that the "green madness" is science, it would prevent the teaching of science.
"The people who run the schools" are frequently parochial bigoted morons. The schools are paid for by the state, and the state has an imperative role in making sure the students are educated, sometimes in direct contradiction to their parents' wishes. Education is the defence of the state (Benjamin Franklin). A state that prevents its citizens from thinking in the disguise of education is weakening itself, with consequences that are already obvious.
The (executive) government can breach the constitution. If it does, well, that's what the judiciary is for, the likes of Alito and Thomas notwithstanding. In theory, that's the resolution to your paradox.
If questioned, "I support the principles of the US Constitution completely." If asked for more detail about the current government, "With respect, making a governmental decision about me based on my answer to that question is unconstitutional. See my answer to the first question, in particular the bits about free speech, free association, self-incrimination and equal protection before the law."
I have no intention of going anywhere near a place where an employee of the US Government might be empowered to ask one of those questions any time soon.
Maybe that was the case back in the 60s and 70s when there were professional jobs for graduates to go into and earn a reliable comfortable living for themselves and their families.
For anyone who has grown up under the kleptocracy that has been in place since the Reagan era, the whole country is f*cked and demanding it be turned into some kind of socialist "utopia" where billionaires and presidents don't feel inclined to buy entire islands so they can isolate themselves from the anger of the millions of people whose labour enabled them is the only way society will have any actual security, as opposed to the illusion of security the kleptocrats have been selling us unsuccessfully for decades.
Monocultures don't become multicultural overnight. Integration needs to be a positive decision, not just something a society hopes will happen passively and naturally.
Australia made a decision to become a multicultural country 75 years ago, and out of necessity. The idea that Anglo Australia could stay not only dominant but the exclusive culture was rubbish anyway
Whether it be the displaced people of WWII, Vietnamese or Somali or any of the other groups that made home here, they've all brought their own trauma and all needed help adjusting.
But I like walking through Footscray or the Vic Market or down Swanston Street and trying to work out what nationalities I live with. I like that the kids of my country hear dozens of languages in their playgrounds.
It's the opposite of boring.
There is a second prong to the AU government's approach here and it's: Use our ID validation.
MyID (FFS will marketroids ever move on from trying to make us feel included, warm and fuzzy? The "M" section of my app list is clogged with My[phone company], My[energy company], My[government service] when we all know perfectly well it's theirs. And I still can't pay my power bill.) will serve to let you into MyGov ($@#*!) and thence Medicare, the Tax Office, Centrelink (welfare), Child Support, Passports, the Post Office, even PBS Prescribing if you're a medico like me, all high value targets.
Registration starts with 100 points of ID and current address validation, so at least 2 government issued photo ID sources and usually a recent bill issued against your current residential address, validated against the respective state and commonwealth databases that issued them. And if you're worried about Met Police style re-birthing, 1) they validate against the death certificates as well, and 2) most neonatally deceased don't get drivers licences.
It then becomes 2FA to let you in to the service of your choice. So far I've only been asked to use it to access government services. I'm thinking it's a matter of time before e.g. online banking services are subjected to mandatory minimum ID verification standards. AU gov: haven't worked out your infrastructure for that? Would you care to look at ours...