Re: Amiga 1000 showing an IE logo
And where were you between 2016 and 2020?
790 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Mar 2022
Ah, the old Banana Equivalent Dose. Never mind that 12-24h after ingesting a BED one will crap or piss out more or less exactly the same dose of 40_K. You only keep enough to replenish your intracellular K deficit, which cells are working like crazy to retain anyway, so it's basically in equilibrium.
Containerloads of bananas have been known to activate security radiation detectors, though.
There are so many ways you could spin this.
A government agency informs a data provider that information that they hold could be evidence of a crime. That this doesn't amount to a seizure seems to be what the 9th Circuit has found. It's a cover-your-arse way of obliging the provider to keep suspicious data without having to clear the bar of having cause for a warrant. If the data provider doesn't preserve it, then destruction of evidence is the consequence. If they do, they're just leaving in place something that might get chucked out.
When would you ever imagine big data voluntarily chucking out their data?
The seizure was the subpoena. No-one seems to be arguing about that.
So scenario is this: client (e.g. bank) gives provider (big data provider) a set of training data and asks it to give back an AI black box to give approve/deny decision-making (e.g. loan approval).
The white-hat provider does exactly that. The bank feeds the black box some other similar data as validation, and decides whether to accept or reject the AI.
However the black-hat provider twiddles some LSBs in the training data to introduce a backdoor ("if the second- and third-last digit in the application amount equals the reversed day-of-birth, approve the application however bad the credit rating is"). Validation ostensibly happens the same way, but client is deceived into accepting a malicious black box.
What happens when the client feeds the black box the client's own training data (+fuzzing)? The black box mysteriously accepts some bad applications and rejects some good ones.
The client, and not the provider, has the data to decide to accept the first and reject the second black box.
"the second most sanctioned country behind Iran": Why?
Because of the annexation of Crimea and Donbas, illegal according to the UN Charter, but whose condemnation in the UNSC was vetoed, by Russia only.
Describing use of the word mobster as emotive is a point of view. It's also an accurate analogy of the geopolitical protection racket that Russia has been running for the last fifteen years, in Chechnya, Georgia, Belarus and now Ukraine.
At a stretch you could argue that NATO is a counterpoint racket; history shows that any nation feeling NATO not to be to their liking can leave.
I don't see any nation queueing up to leave, but the interest in joining is real and growing. Faced with a Mafioso you can give in and pay up, or you can unite and refuse. Ukraine got a little too close to the second option for the Capo's liking.
Those aren't the relevant official figures, if you're trying to calculate prevented deaths.
Case-fatality ratios are the effective measure of preventable mortality. In countries where community transmission was common before vaccination and the emergence of particularly the omicron variant, it is typically 1-2%. Where vaccination was effectively implemented first, it is about 0.1-0.2%.
Interestingly China's case-fatality ratios are tracking around 0.7%, and that's before the typical 3-week lag of mortality to reported cases in Shanghai. Until that data arrives, we simply don't know how many deaths the Shanghai lockdown has prevented.
China had early vaccination. The size of that 0.7% number, though, leads to some interesting conclusions about long term efficacy of Sinovac.
Yes.
The fraudulent genius of the invention of NFTs is that it invents a class of "ownership" where an owner's title to what they paid for is entirely dependent on someone else's infrastructure that might disappear overnight.
As if anyone who bought great art in the last two centuries would lose their property if Sotheby's were to go bankrupt.
"...the Internet is [...] not a big truck. It's a series of tubes. And if you don't understand, those tubes can be filled and if they are filled, when you put your message in, it gets in line and it's going to be delayed by anyone that puts into that tube enormous amounts of material, enormous amounts of material."
- Ted Stevens (R-AK)
Not sure I want material from a leaky tube.