PS the post code box on their address from doesn't work, so I can't add my chosen beneficiary back in without saying it's a non UK address!
At which point it crashes, losing all details...
161 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Mar 2022
It was less shit before, in that whilst it couldn't handle the concept of more than one period of employment, it did at least have previous annual benefit statements and online calculators that worked. Oh yeah and links to scheme guidance that actually, well linked to something other than the top of the webpage.
Oh yeah, and it knew who my beneficiary is.
How many people already in receipt of their pension will even know that their pension provider has forgotten that?
Now it has basically has nothing, ok not quite nothing - it has a crazy concept of how long I've been a civil servant. Plus a number of disconnected Excel spreadsheets that they call calculators. Interestingly one that has a version on was clearly created in 2019.
Not much use without the data to put in them though.
I'm still waiting for answers to a question I put a couple of months ago about how much I'd get - they may or may not want me to go down that route.
I suspect mine will have been lost somewhere in the transition. It will certainly be on the wrong form, as they have none of those to complete for enquiry any more.
It isn't on time if it doesn't work :(
And why oh why oh why, does the computer system used to administer pensions belong to the service provider rather than the service.
Oh yeah, outsourcing.
And as they've lost folks login details, wonder if they've lost the backlog of queries too ?
Yep, I was involved in some of the testing, as an end user. It was at latest 2019 maybe even 2018 when it all started. Project had to identify everything that was being used. Get decisions on what had to be continued. Wrangle testers across all those different areas. Most could be tested on virtual machines, but my team had a special requirement. So I got given a real laptop with the candidate build. That was the start of March 2020.
dBase had at least one cheaper but practically identical (and ISTR better in some ways) imitator, FoxPro.
Others I can think of, and used, DataEase on IBM PC.
SuperBase on Amiga and IBM.
And the evilness that was Lotus.
Or maybe it's early client/server - Ingres, Informix, Sybase ?
Plus mainframe and mini stuff but I didn't touch any of that.
So I just had an argument with Copilot!
I tried lying about having bought the domain, but it doubled down on how that can't be true. Even when I asked it to check the website, Copilot told me that m365.com was still delivering Microsoft content via their CDN Akamai!!!
Took me several goes for it to admit it was wrong, not until I quoted ename.com did it finally cop to the fact that it (or Microsoft?) got that wrong.
This is how the world ends ...
https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/8Jhu45kcS2f5b6zAuBBsH
Which was going to be my question.
Surely a presentation on how great copilot is should be created by the tool itself. And if it was, then it just shows, that like other office juniors, it still has a lot to learn.
I've recently had to point out to staff the existence of example.com and to please remove dummy.com ....
But then I just asked Copilot who owns m365.com, it's answer is Microsoft!
https://copilot.microsoft.com/shares/iRDDRtK8Z8UGKWLUKRLkd
Interestingly using Chrome to visit the site takes me to the Chinese page with an offer to buy, using Edge takes me to a search results page with the M$ Office page at the top!
Yeah but, err, it's Office AI, sorry no I mean M$365 CoPilot Clowned, innit. The bastard offspring from Redmond needs to train itself on your every keystroke, pause, rewrite, then one day, you can just vaguely glance in the direction of your inbox and it'll fire off replies to all the other specIAl agents in use by everyone else, so they can reply to each other in a never ending cycle..
Funnily enough, some of us have dealt with them under more than one name. TBF they're not worse than the rest, all of whom prey on Gov contracts.
But it doesn't take dog-e to work out that spaffing money to those consultancies is one of the most costly inefficiencies. Just employ staff at a decent wage
Oh I do, partial retirement is not that far off now - and everyone knows it and my attitude to all this new fangled nonsense...
I do continue to teach the new ones the advantages of actually knowing what you're doing and how things work. That will stand them in good stead whatever the future holds.