Re: Simplest solution
A job for AI.
114 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Feb 2022
I suspect that most people contributing to open source have a job which pays well or are retired. Take the Linux OS for example, the product is free to use or copy, within the license restrictions. It's used by big corporations, non-profit organisations and individuals.
If corporations were forced to pay for open source development, they might just decide to use closed source development instead. In fact, they support open source development with donations and paid code.
If you help an elderly person across the road, would you ask for payment depending on their wealth? Nah.
You are free to start an open source model with a license that prohibits commercial use without payment for the coding hours at some rate. Not sure about the minimum wage thing though, not all jurisdictions have a minimum wage.
Money is not the only thing that can be received in exchange for working. For example, working part time as a volunteer at a hospital after retiring may be fulfilling- it's also better for society as a whole, even if the hospital is nominally profit making, as most hospitals are subsidized in some way.
Software engineers may feel satisfaction in problem solving and seeing their work being useful.
In the distant future, money may not exist anyway.
Might be true for other jobs, but doubt very much that software engineers have difficulty finding jobs, regardless of their backgrounds. If there was no free software, everything would be more expensive, and people with little money would be able to afford less. We would also be much more dependant on Microsoft et al.
No. Because some people are able to have visual memories does not mean that all people are visual thinkers. I also suspect that the stored data is recreated on the same way that an AI would if you fed it the appropriate prompt. We don't even perceive everything that the retina receives, how could we remember it? I image it works like this:
Image is converted into an image prompt, and then stored.
Would also explain why people are such bad witnesses in crime scenes. Whole people and large objects can be edited out/in.
You can get old fashioned devices which don't have any internet connection or use an app, for example using paper strips and blood drops. Not as convenient as a CGM. It might be possible that a CGM would still function if your phone was in airplane mode, which could be useful if you are outside cell coverage. You could then note the reading, and delete the data before restoring the connection. You might have to re-enter your details each time however.
I don't care if somebody has my medical details, my health insurer can neither cancel cover or increase prices based on ill health.
Use WhatsApp or any other communication method with end-to-end encryption. Only use websites with HTTPS. The endpoint will still be recorded, but not the content. Better data protection laws are needed, preferably without repeated requests for cookies authorization etc. Each person should have an independently stored privacy policy.
My father had difficulty using a mouse - he was in his 70s, and I found that he had turned it upside down, so moving the mouse up moved the cursor down. He also could not get the hang of keeping the button down while moving the mouse, so all folders were littered with new documents created as the top menu action.
- If AI will be a threat to humanity in the future, regulation will not stop it, just as laws don't stop terrorists or treaties stop rogue states.
- Threats to individual humans might be stopped by laws governing arming AI-powered robots in some jurisdictions.
- Difficult or impossible to stop AI from acquiring money, for example by hacking, then uninterruptible power supplies and weapons by "regulations".
IT systems built by government departments have a long history of enormous cost, massive cost overruns and delays of years in delivery. Firms are not immune from such problems, but competition forces poor performers out. To force companies to take security seriously, big fines and compensation need to be introduced.
Difficult to get any internet-connected device that doesn't want to send logging of some sort to the manufacturer. Should make an internation law/treaty that this is strictly opt-in, and what the reasons are for it. Breaching the law should result in big fines and compensation. Still, you should, as the poster did, ensure that they can't send data "home".
Nothing to stop anyone using VPNs, setting up shop in a "Western state" or co-opting people in said Western states. The only way to stop digital theft would be to trash the internet and digital storage. That is not going to happen. It's a bit like fire prevention - you can take measures which will decrease the likelihood, but never change the risk to zero. Incidentally, IP theft was taking place long before computers were invented. How do you think inventions like the wheel and fire became worldwide?
Seems like big bounties on the people behind malware could be cheap at half the price. Also, no reason for a hosted WordPress etc. installations not to take some simple actions, like locking/unlocking code for update.
Introduce an international best practices code for published software, websites, cybersecurity, backups etc, with a scale of warnings and increasing fines tailored to popularity and revenue. Increase security support for software to 10 years. The fines can go to pay for the oversight. Make it illegal to pay ransoms. Community service penalties for C-suits.
https://solarplanet.uk/8-solar-myths-busted/
There are small vertical wind turbines designed for installing on buildings, usually generating under 750 watts. There is typically more wind in winter.
If you use solar or wind or both. Optimally, you should be able to store electricity and heat for later use.
If you have 1,000 non-identical predictions, they can't all be entirely correct. With this argument, you can say there is no point in making any predictions on anything.
As for predictions far in the future, such as the sun becoming a red gas giant, is there also no point? If you have to wait until the predicted event occurs before one is willing to entertain a prediction, then it's no longer a prediction but an observation.