Re: How about no...
So, no WhatsApp, messenger, meet, zoom, teams on the web? That'd be a disaster for Linux where there aren't native apps.
125 publicly visible posts • joined 3 Feb 2022
That's not the issue. The problem is this: you have a Windows server on-prem, and a license for it. If you move it to Azure then there's no license cost because Microsoft converts it to a Cloud License. If you move it to AWS or GCP then you need to buy a new license because Microsoft doesn't allow you to convert it to a cloud license. That's why everyone moves their Windows workloads to Azure.
Perplexity is small enough not to be targeted yet. But at the end it's an unethical engine that presents harvested text from other web pages. If I ask which OLED TV is the best, it'll extract the information from comparison sites and present it. Eventually those sites will block it or they'll die.
You can't just make a web page that shows information from all other internet web pages. Perplexity never compared TVs, so its results are practically stolen, even if there's a reference. They're providing a service based on other people's work without paying loyalties.
Traditional search engine keep the quoted texts at minimum for this reason. I expect the lawsuits to start sometime next year.
Imagine for a moment Microsoft owning Chrome. The horror of Christmas past. The path to the end of the opensource Chromium.
That's not fiction. Microsoft is the only company with enough money and a search engine, that can be used to fund the billions per year needed to develop Chrome.
I've lived through the 90s and 00s and seen the impact of Internet Explorer, actively preventing the success of any operating system other than Windows.
No, thanks. I strongly prefer the most popular web engine to be opensource and Microsoft isn't the one to do it, as they never did.
I'm on exactly the same page. Long term Linux desktop user, can't stand Windows. Mostly Debian. I've been using Linux for everything and today it is better than ever.
One thing that I am experimenting lately with is ChromeOS with Lacros for a laptop. The part that I like is that the Linux VMs open graphical windows on the host, so not only text works but also UIs. Firefox, KeepassX, konsole, all just work. The result is a Debian VM that has very similar functionality as my Debian desktop. The only thing that I miss are the keyboard shortcuts of kwin.
It requires you to be comfortable with using Chrome though. The underlying OS is Linux based and Lacros is so isolated that even the OS cannot enforce policies on Chrome profiles. But the host is still based on Chrome.
I use LLMs for software coding assist and for processing and transforming chunks of text. They don't invalidate my job but they do make me more efficient. A 5% efficiency boost at a scale of 100.000 people means approximately 5000 fewer employees needed in order to achieve the same result. This isn't any different than a good IDE, faster compilation times, automated bug catching, and better tooling in general. The only difference is that it is happening across all fields at the same time, and that it has bigger impact on creative professions (in aggregate).
Microsoft is the new Oracle. Making money from strict and potentially anti-competitive licenses that limit what competitors can offer and how users can use their products. They prohibit users from running normal Windows in VMs, then introduce disproportionally high licensing costs for Windows Server Datacenter edition which is allowed to run in a VM.
(And Apple is the new Microsoft, making money from a tightly closed ecosystem)
Oh Apple, you silly goose. With your shenanigans and your fat bottom line. Look at you. Living like there's no tomorrow. Being malicious and schizophrenic. Allowing other browsers on one of your OSes but not the other. Claiming insecurity for restricting them but also claiming security on the OS that you don't.
Ate you alright? You don't make much sense lately.
This is a good explanation but tying e2e credentials to TLS isn't something that would work on the modern Internet. It'd require the Application layer and HTTP to have information from and interact with the TLS session. That would make all cloud-based load balancers that terminate TLS (most of the Internet nowadays) incompatible. It also gets tricky to handle mid-session where the session cookie is actually being created or destroyed.
Overall, binding cookies to a device is certainly the way to go. Even without a TPM, having a device-specific storage (like a service in Linux running as a different user) would be a big leap. And for the cases where you can't trust the local system, you'll need a TPM-like solution.
Apple silently stayed on the side while the EU has been busy investigating Google. The end result is that they created the closest ecosystem ever of that size.
Their devices only work with themselves and the 1 billion users they have are unable to use a different browser engine, a different payment method, a different store, even a different charger. It is the greatest vendor lock in in the history of humankind. It's time things change a bit.
That's fundamentally wrong. Analytics doesn't care about the user's IP which is already pointless because of Carrier Grade NAT. It's only the approximate location that's important and that can't be hidden because of legal implications, because the sites need to be able to know the country of the user.
> Apple is not a gatekeeper to the Internet
Wait, what? You can't browse the Internet on an iPhone without using Apple's browser and they make sure not to allow any competition. They force you to use their store where ads is one of their biggest money maker, and they have absolutely no interpretability with any other OS. They hold users hostages to their ecosystem and they sell access to them to the highest bidder for $20B per year.
Microsoft b(e)ing Microsoft. People forget what the world was like in the early 2000s when you couldn't browse the internet with Linux because Microsoft was doing shenanigans with internet explorer. And now they claim to be on the other side where they can't force enough of their users to use their fine browser and search engine. Poor them.
This is actually a real problem. The reason you're getting these is probably your ISP or your TV. People are focused on Google but forget that ISPs and Smart TVs now track traffic and use that for promoting ads. It works be interested to see which company sends you that ads.
Unfortunately the EU isn't looking that way. How many people do you think realize that their TV or their Xbox/PS are building an Ad profile for them?