* Posts by Boolian

74 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jan 2022

Page:

Boffins ponder paltry brain data rate of 10 bits per second

Boolian

Losing objects hiding in plain sight I think may be the clue.

I gathered somewhere, that when looking for something it is a virtual image which is held (makes sense so far) and that most 'lost' objects tend to be at unfamiliar angles (remote down the side of a couch) so the improvement to visual searching, is to hold an altered image of the object in the mind, rotated about a different axis.

Now, I cannot claim any empirical evidence - merely anecdotal - but I think to perceive that my success rate at finding objects is improved using this method, especially when I realise I am stuck in an aimless search loop.

Perhaps the exercise in object rotation cycles more image options of places the object could be; if nothing else it seems to refresh the brain and F5 it out the aimless loop which inevitable cycles around the fridge - possibly the shelves of which are the last remaining flat surface + plan view object orientation pairings the brain can think of.

What that suggests about 'Man Look' I don't know, but if this hypothosis has any merit, it does seem that Females appear to cycle through altered object orientations/ locations far better than the Male of the species.

What relation that has to hunter/ gatherer, and spatial awareness dichotomies I have no wish to think about, because I've just realised where my shed key might be.

Guide for the perplexed – Google is no longer the best search engine

Boolian

All the Gear and no Idea

So, Perplexity Search is best summarised as: "I have no idea - here, look it up yourself" ?

Well, that's my takeaway, it certainly appears to be a very aptly named search engine - it'll stab a perplexing guess and deliver a confusing answer in the manner of a harassed parent - brilliant.

"Why is the sky blue Dad?" It's something to do with Quantums I think... yes, Fork Particles or somesuch; they spin about in different colours in all directions, and the blue ones are Up and so when you look up, the sky is blue... it'll be in that encyclopedia somewhere, go and check"

Brits think AI in the workplace is all chat, no bot for now

Boolian

Re: Off topic but...

I happened to bookmark this article from a certain well know techie site; just in case I had to mess with Win11 (Most of my domestic support is now Linux)

It might be of some use to you...

https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2024/02/what-i-do-to-clean-up-a-clean-install-of-windows-11-23h2-and-edge/#p3

Cloudflare broke its logging-as-a-service service, causing customer data loss

Boolian

Cloudy with a hint of pain

These things happen, these things happening hot on the heels of the Cloudstrike/ Microsoft FUBAR is... what is it? Predictable probably, sadly.

Obviously piss poor processes, congenitally hard of thinking with an inability to even care about learning from past mistakes.

Sure it wasn't an entire interwebz graunching, however the principle is identical - "We didn't bother our arse testing a software rollout" Since this is another 'Cloudy' monickered node with a finger in the global interweb, then stand by your beds for the next global reboot in the bollox.

When someone tells you who they are - believe them the first time.

Chinese ship casts shadow over Baltic subsea cable snipfest

Boolian

Re: What was ommitted

Every chance, but not for the reason you may think - cheap is the primary one, drunk the other.

The classic combo Russian/ Filipino (and close geographical variations of that theme) are very common in the shipping industry.

A generalisation certainly; but when you are daily phoning around trying to find a fresh skipper, and/ or crew, due to 'incapacitation' it does give one an insight into why there is such a high incidence of errr... incidents upon the briny wave.

The reports of the vessel sailing somewhat erratically made me snort - sure it could be sabotage, but, Hanlon, Murphy, and Occam all drink at the same bar when it comes to shipping.

tl;dr Much of the worlds shipping industry runs on cheap crew and cheaper alcohol, which stressors also have a tendency to turn shipping logistics centres to drink - literally.

Yo-ho me hearties, Yo-ho.

SpaceX claims another Starship success, but fumbles the catch

Boolian

Fumble Pie

Well, I enjoyed the article, but 'Fumbled the Catch' ?

The pedant in me would suggest that infers there was an attempt to catch - there wasn't.

There was an aspiration to catch, an expection even, but as they did not attempt it, it couldn't be fumbled. They aborted the aspiration early - due to a hardware issue with Tower telemetry I'm led to believe (bent an arial and started picking up Freeview perhaps)

Still the law of headlines applies, and I do appreciate the punning involved with the juxtaposition of "Catch" I therefore humbly refrain from any suggestion for improvement.

Reaction Engines' hypersonic hopes stall as funding fizzles out

Boolian

Sonic the Dead Dog

Yes, it is a sad state of affairs which I bemoan.

In saying that, Hypersonic Flight is merely yesterdays Jet Boots and Fusion.

I was promised all as a wee lad, many, many deacdes ago. Every decade there was a new story about 'Hypersonic this n ' that... complete with 'artists conceptions'....zzzz

So, sad as it is, it isn't as sad as me not having my Jet Boots - 'cos I was promised them in the Brave New Dawn, which is rapidly becoming the Tired Old Sunset.

Next...

Linus Torvalds: 90% of AI marketing is hype

Boolian

Re: Only 90% ?

His 'softness' can be traced back to his holiday to Scotland around 2018.

Pretty much, he thought he was 'abrasive' and with a fair command of casual expletives, but was completely schooled just geting a taxi and booking into his hotel...probably.

Seriously, Linus Torvalds isn't even on the radar for 'toxicity' there; on Linus' worst day, a Scottish maintainer wouldn't bat an eyelid, other than to wonder why he was being so flirtatious.

https://tinyurl.com/2csqx9gp

First time's the charm: SpaceX catches a descending Super Heavy Booster

Boolian

Re: To the Moon and Mars

Not all Ships/ Boosters will make landings on the Moon/ Mars/ other bodies. The greater majority will be servicing those specialist 'Landers' eg: refueling, and/or delivering other customer payloads to orbits.

Certainly a 'landable' ship will *probably be required, and a way to overcome eg: no aerobraking (Moon) I cannot quite see how any of that will work (and I think Artemis is lunacy) but then I couldn't comprehend what I witnessed yesterday.

If there is a faster and more economical way to turnaround a booster (and ship) then by all means have at it on the back of a napkin.

*What about a landable 'Lego' tower? If they can be accurate with ships and boosters why not payloads?

Pack modular tower sections in ships as payload-to-the-surface, delivered under their own power, let them land on top of one another until you have snapped an automated Mechzilla together - bring in an orbital ship sans legs.

Or, don't bother as payload and assembly - launch and land a tower complete - I dunno, I'm not a rocket surgeon, isn't a Starship merely a form of powered payload on top of a Superheavy booster - and after yesterday, what is the definition of madness really?

With billions in UK govt IT contracts about to expire, get the next vendors to act right

Boolian

Trickle Downed

I've no idea what I need, or how to achieve it... I better call call the "Consultants"

Yeah no probs, that'll be 10 mill to deliver.

"Yeah, Mike, I told them 10 mill, we've no clue though, better call the Consultants... "Yeah, Jim, it's a 5 mill project, you can do that? Great, welcome aboard.

Yeah, I told Mike we could do it for 5 mill, you any idea how to go about it? Nah, me neither, better call a Consultant... "Hi, Bob...yeah it's a 3 mill deal, you can? Excellent...

...

Better call an Agency... Yeah, Fiona, it's 500 thou for a 12 month Project. You reckon? Superb, I'll draw up the contract...

Agency: We need 12 IT contractors for a 12 month project, 15 quid an hour, you can? Brilliant, welcome aboard.

*source: decades of IT contracting.

Have we stopped to think about what LLMs actually model?

Boolian

Peace In

Thank you for reminding me of this... condition? phenomenon? I did read a fascinating article and interview (somewhere which escapes me) and meant to re-visit the ideas.

For those with the 'voices' I'd suggest exploring the concept as it strikes deeply into the human psyche. It certainly is such an outre concept that I have the most difficult time comprehending the implications.

I literally cannot imagine how to function continually in this fascinating manner (though I can tentatively identify processes where I have been temporarily in a similar state)

As to the comparison between one model of the 'mind' and another, I can but imagine yours is possibly a far more peaceful place to reside.

Microsoft sends Windows Control Panel to tech graveyard

Boolian

Control Old Delete

Gotta keep re-inventing that wheel.

What will I miss? Well, the speed, the intutiveness, the logic to the interface...

'Settings' is JAFFE (Just Another Fekn Front End) with random gash hung off it - the submenus are all over the place like a mad wummin's sh*** and it's as slow as a week in the jail.

Oh well, it's a brave new world etc etc. You can, as ever, keep it.

Rocket Factory Augsburg engine test ends in explosion at SaxaVord spaceport

Boolian

Up Hella Aaargh!

Came for terrible puns, I am disappoint.

I mean, 'Saxons Abort' is right there...

Oh, well, here's hoping RFA can continue onwards, and upwards.

C'mon I can't do all the heavy lifting here, help me out...

NASA mulls using SpaceX in 2025 to rescue Starliner pilots stuck on space station

Boolian

Re: Most important opinion

That's a fair comment, but effectively they don't. They are cargo with some training - training to an exceptional standard - but they do not have the indepth engineering training to make such calls and must defer to 'Ground Control'. Effectively they have no say, practically of course, they do have a say - but that'll be the end of their career. Being employed as a test pilot and refusing to test is certainly an option, but you kinda don't get to be a test pilot again.

Astronauts are made of different stuff, our concerns in such situations are not neccessarily their concerns, they already strapped themselves into a rocket for a start... no rocket launch is a flight to Ibiza.

Boolian

Re: R U kidding?

Not really on a couple of counts.

The 'Auto' functionality was removed, and the current Starliner (Test?) flight requires crew for that manoeuvre. Also, the Canadarm is not a funfair 'graboid', and requires any craft/payload to be fitted with a grapple fixture for its 'effector' to interface with.

That is another story of course - why is an universal grapple fixture not a reqirement for all payloads to the ISS? Who knows, but Starliner doesn't have one (as far as I can ascertain) though Dragon capsules (among others) are fitted with one.

To my knowledge, Starliner could auto-dock (this flight) but not auto-undock, and the only way to get it TF off of the ISS hard dock without crew, is to blow it off (this function exists ISS side) but would destroy the docking ring in the process. Whether that docking ring could then be repaired is another issue, but the ISS would be down one docking port for the forseeable future.

Everyone is trying fairly with suggestions, but Starliner is fighting every option at every turn, which is why 'clusterfuck' is the most applied epithet.

Boolian

Momentary Lapse of Reason.

Not replete with comments here, may I suggest that it is because everyone's flabber is so gasted that words are inadequate.

Someone, somewhere, decided to pull the plug on Starliners autonomous undocking capability - what is the expression? "I can't even..."

Yup, nobody can even, except me, and even I can't.

SpaceX Falcon 9 set for comeback after upper-stage failure

Boolian

Line Hooray

From what I gather the speed of identification of the problem held no magic; "Was there any difference between this one and all the others?" - Yeah, we had put an extra line in this one for a prior customer specification "Show me the plan... yeah, right there, it also deviates from the primary line in its fixings"

So, that's all fair enough if I have defined it correctly, however, as noted elsewhere, that does still leave a QC/QA problem for SpaceX that was overlooked.

Not unique of course, accomodating customer specs beyond standard, is the bane of every industry I've ever been involved in - of course one can offer to custom build, but of course each custom build is in essence a new build.

Part of the additional cost for customisation should be for additional QA/QC - and customers do pay a premium for customised rocket payloads for sure.

Which makes me ponder certification in general. How far can a Falcon 9 (or any other rocket system) deviate from its certification before it requires re-certification?

A line here, a fastener there, a customer specifies a change of paint job, when does it become a rocket of Theseus?

Just an idle pondering, doubt I'll ever find out, but certainly we know what the outcome can be if you take it to extremes in an aircraft...

"So, we changed the upholstery fabric, and the design of the drinks trays... "Yeah sure, sure fine" Lets see, we have a new logo on the tail, new engine, avionics and change of flight characteristics, complimentary hot-towels and new uniforms for the stewardesses. "Yeah, sure, sure....no, wait, what?"

CrowdStrike fiasco highlights growing Sino-Russian tech independence

Boolian

One Short Plank

I have the greatest sympathy for CloudStrike since they weren't responsible for taking anything down.

"Here, have this plank and smack yourself in the face with it" errr no, no, I don't think so. "Why not?" Well, that would be a bit silly of me..."

There are a few actors involved who are thicker than two short planks, but CrowdStrike aren't any of them - they only asked people to smack themselves in the face, and they all obliged.

Cybercriminals quickly exploit CrowdStrike chaos

Boolian

Elder Abuse

There isn't any resolution for this, because it will be successful. It will be successful because currently the 'News' across a myriad of media is variously : "The Internet is down! All Microsoft machines are down! Microsoft killed the Internet! CrowdStrike attack kills the Internet, kills Microsoft, your dog! etc.

The fact that it is a software error, on specific Microsoft operating systems, specifically hooked into CloudStrike software is not the point; the point is what does the majority believe, and the majority believes what it's told. If the majority believe that, they'll believe anything - and fork out for absolution.

Amid the unwarranted abuse, the Elders of the Internet may only stand aloof, and issue the 'Sacred Proclamation' to be be dispensed yet again by their Initiates: "Have you tried turning it off and on again?"

*Edited for the capital "S" in the perps name...

If you think AI labs wouldn't stoop to using scraped YouTube subtitles for training, think again

Boolian

So, to defeat AI scraping, everyone has to be Scottish?

Boeing's Starliner set for extended stay at the ISS as engineers on Earth try to recreate thruster issues

Boolian

Re: This is the third flight.

Surprisingly (not surpisingly?) yes they did.

For some reason they couldn't find 45 days to ground test the thrusters either time in an effort to sort that out.

For some reason they have now managed to find 45 days to ground test them looking for a solution, while two astronauts wait in space testing as well.

During the first test, the Mission Elapsed Time clock failed, causing thrusters to burn too long and fail - they had data on that.

Correct the clock failure, don't bother about the thrusters - if the clock doesn't fail again, the thrusters won't burn too long and won't fail...probably.

For the second test, a couple of the thrusters fail to fire, but there is redundancy, and the other thrusters pick up the slack - they also have data on this.

(there were also many 'stuck' valve issues prior to that test flight, but it eventually did go up and down nominally)

The unkind would say that 2+2 was not considered, or if considered discarded. Firing too much causes an issue + Individual thrusters can fail to fire = when thrusters fail to fire, even with redundancy, the remaining thrusters burn longer to compensate.

So how many thrusters can overheat and fail before the remainder also begin overburning? Well I think they just found that out, on a crewed flight.

This time it appears that it wasn't the 'clock' which caused an 'overburn', and it wasn't thrusters failing to fire, but software allowing individual thrusters and/or thrusters too close to one another, to fire too many times - many corrections = overburn.

What was different from this mission compared to nominal test flight #2 I do not know. Why were the thrusters correcting/ firing so much this time and not last time?Maybe they were correcting just as much last time, but just in a different sequence which also happened to be just enough not to cause overheating and shutdown - only NASA, Boeing, and Aerodyne know.

It's possible they could spread the corrective burns around the pods of thrusters to keep overburn/ overheating down with a software re-configuration.. or maybe they could have done that in the first place...

It should be acknowledged, this is designated as a crewed test flight - so y'know, they're testing...

Probably the on orbit ISS testing the astronauts are doing, is going through every permutation of firing sequences/ compensation depending on how many thrusters are available to them at any given point during de-orbit orientation (the problem thrusters will orientate, different thrusters will actually do the burn)

I suppose a vague analogy would be Ken Mattingly running the permutations on the Main Bus B Undervolt on Apollo 13 and having the crew run identical sequences.

Which is probably why Butch and Sunny say they are confident of returning in Starliner - they've spent over a month now running the numbers. They believe they'll have the minimum thrusters they'll need, and understand how to fire them accordingly in any given circumstance.

I'm no rocket surgeon, so that is an oversimplification as I understand it, and I'm sure I'll be corrected by someone.

*insert shrug

Europe blasts back into the heavy launch biz with first Ariane 6 flight

Boolian

The Devil you know

Successful launch and deployment of legacy tech - which is actually a good thing, it is reliable continuity.

The not so good of course, is that it was delivered a bit late and the only new thing failed, though I fully expect that to be resolved.

Of course people now expect reuseability, and decry the apparent lack of foresight in developing a rocket with such ability, but we should remember the timeframe for such expectation is relatively recent.

The shift in geo-politics is relatively recent also. Where one may have had a window of outsourcing launches globally, while rocket surgeons tinkered in the shed designing the novel, reuseable stages de-jour - it was a relatively short window.

I'm sure many in the EU programme were pushing to develop reuseable capabilities a decade or so ago - but a decade or so ago, Europe was also watching its Eastern borders suddenly hang on a shaky peg.

There was a short period for the EU to gamble funds on developing the unknown 'New Space' while it had another eye on perhaps requiring those funds to be spent on slightly different kind of 'rocketry'.

That's a tough call only hindsight can verify - of course the EU would want to compete commercially and potentially lower costs for the State sector space programme, but it also wants to continue actually being the EU.

The USA is not politically a stable state either (however one may argue otherwise) Its state rocketry is also old skool expendable, late, ruinously expensive, and its novel, reuseables are entirely in the hands of private industry.

The USA can spin on a political dime at any time regarding access to its technology and attitude to the rest of the world, and its primary, private space enterprise head honchos are hardly a stable touchstone either.

Upshot: you can't rely on anyone but yourself if you need 'Space', and if you know how to do Space - even if it is 'Old Space' - then do it.

Ariane may carry some commercial payload to help pay for parking, but its primary purpose is to serve EU member states. Cost may well be an issue which reuseability could help with in 'Commercial Space' - but cost is not necessarily the same issue in 'State Space'.

The EU has a small, commercial space sector developing reuseables, until then an Ariane will put whatever an EU member state wants, wherever they want it, without recourse to the USA, Russia, China, India et-al. That has a 'worth' and commands a price all if its own.

Looking at those other nation states, they've followed a similar model, the difference being that certain unified nation states managed to produce insanely wealthy private sectors to drive 'New Space' and/or channel massive state wealth into that sector.

The 'socialist', politically and tenuously unified EU tends to have other priorities (not least its Eastern borders, if not internal ones) The EU will probably, inevitably transition to reusability, until then at least they have something to rely on.

Space is hard, yet they popped Ariane 6 up first try - nice one.

Defiant Microsoft pushes ahead with controversial Recall – tho as an opt-in

Boolian

Re: Is Opting In good enough to calm my nerves .... I don't quite recall ... but assume *NO* !!!

Flagged by Edge eh? Ha! I was wondering why I hadn't seen reports of any other 'Security software' flagging it as a PUP - that's a first.

As @Richard12 pointed out to me, that's probably because of the ubiquitous use of 'Microsoft Defender' (which I assume ignores Recall) if so, it seems Edge hasn't got the memo to whitelist it... yet.

It appears everyone else and their dog got the memo though. Curiouser and curiouser.

Boolian

Keep the Red Flag Flying.

Hmm, I have to ask the obviously not so obvious question: how are Microsoft and Anti-Virus/ Malware companies colluding?

Even the worst security product should flag 'Recall' as a blunt keylogger at the very least; so what mechanism does Microsoft, Windows, or Recall utilise, which enables it to escape detection as a 'PUP', or whitelists it from being flagged?

Answers on a one-time pad...

Disenchanted Windows user? Pop open a fresh can of Linux Lite

Boolian

Lite Fantastic

Linux Lite may have idiosyncracies which irk experienced Penguinistas - but I find it doesn't trouble transitioning noobs at all.

It is my go-to Distro for dropping on ageing PC's/ Laptops with perhaps 15 minutes of user 'training' - which is more orientation than tech.

I have had no technical callbacks from new users at all (not even printer related!) I have trialled a few of the other, usual Distros in the past for novices (the Yankee term escapes me, what is it now? 'Learningers' or something probably) but Linux Lite hit the sweet spot for transitioning Windows users straight out the gate.

At worst, enquiries are of the "Where do I find" variety, but no-one has said "Get this junk off my machine, I hate it!"

I have transitioned 'power users' who were seeking a more *cough "feature rich environment" to eg: Mint, after they've first used Linux Lite, but I'd hesitate to make such heavyweight Distros my first choice. I feel LL is an ideal introductory environment.

It's not quite as light as it possibly could be, but it is nowhere near as resource heavy as others.

The last 'drop' I did was on an old Toshiba Satellite With AMD E-450's and 6gb Ram - it has happily ticked along on that, and reportedly only creaks a bit on multi-tab embedded media website browsing, but it apparently handles video conferencing very well - which surprised me

I'll be interested in how this new version rolls.

Brexit border system outage puts perishable goods transport in peril

Boolian

Red Lorry Yellow Lorry

Can't talk about Brexit without it being someone's gibberish.

The Brexit referendum, like all UK referendums (referenda) was advisory - there is no obligation to implement any referendum - though granted, politically it would be difficult not to. Brexit suffered from lack of definition though.

Exit from Europe was defined almost entirely around Parliamentary Sovereignty*. I don't have any issue with those who wanted the UK to 'Exit' from the UK's Political Union with the EU - for a given value of valid, it had it's arguments.

However, there are many ways a Nation can be affilliated with the EU, and the UK decided that Brexit would mean exiting every single one. I'd suggest that part was not explained adequately to the electorate, and for many years to come the UK must abide by its consequences - black bananas and all.

Now a potted history lesson: After WW2, the UK was pressed by the USA to join, and take a lead and be its 'Man on the inside steering' in the fledgling EU : the ECSC. However, the UK said 'F**k that for a game of soldiers, we'll trade with our Commonwealth instead'.

The USA, exasperated, then turned to Germany as its lead partner in the EU - where its interest remains.

Trading with the Commonwealth instead, didn't work out very well for the UK at all; so after lagging behind Europe for over a decade, the UK ended up in the EC anyway because it had to - because Trade.

The fact that the EU had demilitarised and invested its Marshall Plan dosh into infrastructure and rebuilding, while the UK decided the opposite - and had to beg a couple of extra loans from the US after spunking the free dosh up a tree - did not help.

'We were the only ones to repay our debt!' was also bollox, because nobody was told we were the only ones who had the debt in the form of massive loans from the USA.

Interestingly, Germany repaid its Marshall Plan Grant despite not being under any obligation to do so, as it wasn't a loan. Germany's 'Mittelstand' model is still underpinned by Marshall Plan invested dosh to this day.

The demilitarisation of the EU still reverberates, as the USA is exasperated that it can't get members to consistently spunk GDP on its military industrial complex, like the UK has seldom ceased doing. To that, the EU members have always said 'F**k that for a game of soldiers - look where that got the UK'.

FFWD to Brexit and the UK Government did actually say frequently - 'Bollox to the EU, we'll trade with the Commonwealth instead'. That would be a Commonwealth much reduced in scope and British influence since the '50's. and the last failed attempt.

Business knows that it cannot stand alone, or competition will eat its lunch. Every business is a member of some domestic trade federation, or buying group, or it is not a business for very long.

You pay your dues, and you abide by the rules, and you have a voice at the table. The EU has a few trade structures available to everyone and their dog, which does not require membership of the EU and 'Loss of Sovereignty'. Loss of some autonomy certainly, in the same as way being a SMB member of a trade federation.

The UK was already a member of such federations, but decided it could better negotiate new trade deals from outside, rather than inside, and y'known, there's always the Commonwealth.

"Brexit will be great" and "Aye, Do ye think I came up the Clyde on a banana boat?" is a droll juxtaposition and apt summary.

*Since 'Factortame' the Sovereignty of Parliament has been moot anyway - and that's all the tongue twisting gibberish I have today.

Texan construction workers put a rocket up Team SpaceX over 'unpaid bills'

Boolian

Water terrible situation

The situation regarding payments is not unique, in fact it is an universal and ancient practice, and focussing on SpaceX alone is disingenuous, although the high profile might help shed light on the universal sickness of capitalism. (no it won't)

Water is wet - companies do not get paid in a timely fashion. In the UK, the practice of 60-90-120 day ad-infinitum terms is widespread. Productive companies go to the wall with full order books as each new project is being paid from their own capital and loans - it is unsustainable.

Quotations for contracts often specify they must hold for 1+ year, and with tight margins and rapidly fluctating markets, winning a contract can actually bankrupt you when it comes to the reckoning.

In the UK 30 days is supposed to be the legal term for payment. Statutory Claims may be made against companies who have not paid in a timely manner - I would suggest Statutory Claims should be made of the Government and let the Government chase the debt, now that would be effective quantative easing.

The UK's version was to hand the dosh to the banks "You are behind on your loan payments... the quantitive easing? Yes, well all in good time...oh dear, we will have to foreclose on you in the interrim, such a shame"

"Anyone want to buy some lively real estate and a potential going concern? Ahh, Minister, how nice to see you again, yes there is a nice portfolio of liquidated businesses here this month - take your pick. Yes Sir, all these shabby unemployed are indeed what's wrong with this country - have a nice day Sir, see you again very soon"

It should not be complicated for a Government and its Civil Service to settle: Date of Invoice/ Date of Payment + 30 days? Here's your lolly mate, we'll sort them out - but that just isn't the way fortunes, monopolies, and empires are made.

Government (local government in especial) is one of the offenders - try quoting goods, or services for them and see how long you have to hold your prices and their payment terms. Try to specify 30 day payment and 30 day quotes and watch the desperate competition eat your lunch.

Companies are owed money. Water remains wet. Auld man rant over.

End-to-end encryption may be the bane of cops, but they can't close that Pandora's Box

Boolian

Head Canon

This is merely the deployment of more police, at little cost.This little polis now lives rent free in your head, and is responsible for self censorship, and suggestion.

You might have communicated unencrypted via any medium, in the distant past - but now? Well, you are only going to consider encrypted messaging on specific electronic platforms, by methods suggested to you. For comms to be ubiquitous, the many will now also only consider communicating the same way, which requires no Mk1 eyeball to intercept whatsover.

For Skynet, we all know security is hard - that is canon.

Howsoever, probably the easiest, secure personal comms available today is the snail-mail written letter; the author isn't known, the content is not known, the specific packet it is in is not known, the port it was delvered on is not known, etc ... and the final recipient and reader is not known.

I say 'is not known' - not, 'cannot be known' - but to be known, LEO's or spooks are no longer in out the rain with no heavy lifting.

That plaintext packet is easily intercepted - true, but it first requires several things to be known, and somewhere along the line, a chair needs to be missing an arse in order to know it.

Encrypt the content with anything marginally better than a Caesar cypher, and odds are it will be sitting at the bottom of in-trays for a week - which if nothing else, loudly broadcasts the fact there was a MITM attack.

Trenchcoats and fedoras, not hoodies and laptops is the future of secure, personal comms. In the age of Skynet, the only little polis is the one in your head, not on the street.

/s

Yes, I did just crash that critical app. And you should thank me for having done so

Boolian

Dicks are Dasdardly

"Be as dasdardly as possible" This is the heart of QA. The plaintive cry "But you're not supposed to do that!" is its touchstone - we don't do it for the thanks...

For my sins, I graduated to that role when fellow coders eventually, grudgingly, would shove their 'finished' product to me first, because "That c*** can break anything"

It started out more in annoyance that my colleagues were churning out code for every one piece of mine, and I'd be reprimanded for being slow, when I thought I was being thorough - I came to the conclusion one of us was shit at coding. Could it be me? Surely not, so I started breaking things deliberately, in what was possibly anger.

I started trading code 'You check mine I'll check yours'. I'd break everything I was given, often in seconds ("The lazy b******s I bet they didn't...") They seldom broke mine - not because it didn't have errors, it often did and I knew it did - they just weren't being dasdardly enough.

It turns out having some kind of antisocial, destructive personality is the ideal characteristic for a QA tester - one must take inordinate and smug delight in breaking things, and revel in the tears of your fellows.

Much like a prior incarnation in my youth selling construction equipment - Sales reps would insist on presenting products with "Unbreakable, Indestructible, or 'Toughest' labels - my response was "That just gives the boys on site a challenge on their lunch break, and I'll have a grinning line at the counter the next day demanding a replacement"

"Hate your job, hate your life, revel in schadenfreude? Consider a career in QA"

*Sadly, I am now a grumpy old dick about almost everything "What asshole designed this, and what bigger asshole passed it?" I have pills for it - they don't work.

Mozilla CEO quits, pushes pivot to data privacy champion... but what about Firefox?

Boolian

All wrapped up

I want to use Firefox.

My browsing is predominently mobile based. Firefox has many nice things I would like, but it does not have the one nice thing I need - and neither does any other mobile browser - the killer feature which is functional text re-flow.

There is only one mobile browser which has pretty well nailed that functionality, and that is Opera. Yes I can hear the howls already, and I am very aware of the issues de-jour surrounding Opera.

I can only assume the inability of other browsers to succesfully implement word wrap/ text re-flow as well as Opera* has, is because of some cast iron, nailed down proprietry copyright code - perhaps someone could enlighten me.

Opera (mobile) may not be the killer app, but it certainly has the killer feature (and often is first with them) and so that pretty much wraps it up for Firefox and other browsers for me.

A pity, but there you have it - I have actively chosen to drop to an even lower percentile than the Firefox userbase.

*Yes, I have tried, yes I have seen, and no it isn't, it really isn't.

The 'nothing-happened' Y2K bug – how the IT industry worked overtime to save world's computers

Boolian

Value Added Lax

Had a few contracts that period, Local Authority, NHS, Shipping, among others.

While the majority of machines, and hardware, were incidentals, and Y2K would have had low to zero impact, I most certainly did uncover many systems which would have had critical failures.

There was no way to identify which systems might be affected without going through all systems - that was certainly expensive, but worth it for the peripheral benefits which corporations did not factor.

What Y2K ended up being was effectively a global stocktake of equipment. It all had to be hunted down, identified, asset tagged, and recorded. I personally unearthed hundreds of thousands of pounds of "awol" equipment - to varying responses.

For a start - human nature being what it is - laptops, and other equipment would suddenly appear in order to be "Y2K proofed" (in some cases personal gear) before walking out the door again. However, that was a fatal error: "Oh, that's where that went to, I've been looking for that" - Asset tagged & logged.

"You know the many, many thousands of pounds of missing equipment the Finance department goes spare over annually? Yeah I found it all, and here's a spreadsheet of where it is, and here is who has it..." Now that went two ways, either a company was delighted, or were horrified. The reason they were horrifed I will leave to the imagination.

Suffice to say at an individual level, I had everything from threats, to tears from employees because their "Freebie Perks" were now company property again. At C-suite level the odd heart failure.

How was it done? Well for the bulk of it, I just dumped a small "Loginfo" script into the network servers which interrogated all Hardware/ Software info from the machines logging in & output the data to a csv.

Then I just exported it into a spreadsheet and set off to find it all - asset tags in hand - the monster that I was! Other than that, I'd be armed with a Finance dept's receipts, and donned my sleuthing hat.

Lax stock-taking, tax write-offs, criminal enterprise - who knew what a tangled web was going to be uncovered....

Shame about those wildfires. We'll just let the fossil fuel giants off the hook, then?

Boolian

I think, therefore angst

It's more interesting to me from a philosophical basis.

Those whose philosophy is that we are on a one way ride, cannot be faulted for their philosophy of 'Live for the moment, take all you can' - whether that is a conscious, or unconscious philosophy is immaterial.

Then we move through the existential philosophies of life the universe, and everything - the meaning of life in general. This is probably best summarised in Robert Burn's greatest philosophical poem "To a Mouse" including the lines:

"Still thou are blest, compared wi’ me! The present only toucheth thee: But Och! I backward cast my e’e, On prospects drear! An’ forward, tho’ I cannot see, I guess an’ fear!"

So, taking any philosophy at random which purports to "Guess and fear" we sacrifice today for tomorrow - but to what end?

For future generations who ultimately must also die; if not in the consumption of the Earth by fire, then in the heat-death of the universe.

What great philosophy is this? That we must strive to extend life, and reach beyond our mortal Earth, to new galactic domiciles for the purpose of securing our race perhaps - a mere tenuous guess that there may ultimately be meaning, and always in fear there may not be.

That's either a faith based religion, or some deep requirement for genes to proliferate - or both, take your pick.

No, I have no axe to grind, no view either way, I am absolutely uncertain on the importance of such matters - I merely make the observation, that the human condition is one of philosophy, and the philosophy of living for the moment on a one way ticket to ride, is an entirely unencumbered, stress-free viewpoint of life, the universe, and everything - if anything it's Stoicism.

Now, why would that not be a mentally, evolutionary attractive position - of course it is.

Therefore, there will probably always be a dichotomy between neurotic existential angst, and blissful, if not willful, myopia. Just try and ask a philosopher to define the antithesis of Nihilism, or Absurdism if you want some peace.

tl;dr Why do you care - you'll be dead. "But my children, and grandchildren" They'll die too, everyone dies of something "But there must be some meaning..." Yeah, that's called faith - here, pick a religion.

"You don't get asked to many parties do you?"

All very interesting stuff... carry on, no puns today.

Indian developer fired 90 percent of tech support team, outsourced the job to AI

Boolian

Minority Support

Indian Call centre staff already hallucinate car accidents, and MS Windows issues, so AI hallucinating tech-support is a natural progression.

I suppose in some future semiconditionally modified subinverted plagal past, I can expect a call, or email, informing me that an issue I had not realised I had on-occured, re-in-oncurring, mayan haven-not haven happending, has now been, will haven on-been already resolved.

Err, thanks, I suppose?

Wait... how much!? Yeah, well, I sent, will haven-on sending the cheque yesterday...

Google says public data is fair game for training its AIs

Boolian

Run DMCA

Train it on free, publicly generated data, monetize it, and sell it back - which appears to be everyone's modus operandi nowadays (though Google aren't yet firewalling their content, and demanding subscriptions... give em time).

Maybe, in some far future, the use for blockchain, will be digital watermarks (called GettyFek?) and we will actually be able to monetize our own output - 0.0001p a word, article picture, or video; along with personal AI avatars, whose sole use will be scraping the net hunting for our content, and issueing pay-or-pull notices.

*reaches for calculator, and terminal command.

Cops told: Er, no, you need a wiretap order if you want real-time Facebook snooping

Boolian

Re: Surprise

That list pretty much sums up who has covert access to your data under UK RIPA* law, among many, many other *cough 'agencies with investigative powers' and only omitting "...some chap I bumped into in the mess the other day called Bernard"

*https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regulation_of_Investigatory_Powers_Act_2000

Europe's Euclid telescope launches to figure out dark energy, the universe, and everything

Boolian

I don't like Mond days

Everyone and their dog is hoping for something, anything, which might illuminate the unseeable darkness - perhaps Euclid will the one to pull back the veil.

There are more theories surrounding dark matter than you can shake a gravitational wave detector at, and very much a wild-west frontier gold rush; dark matter may be anything from a WIMP, axion, graviton, photonic mass, a creature from the black dimension or maybe not exist at all.

Much kudos to the winning theory, and yah-boo-sucks to the plucky losers in the race to discover what keeps galaxies from flying apart like shit off a fan.

I for one, have my shiny sixpence down on gravity being time, time being an illusion, and lunchtime doubly so.

Experts scoff at UK Lords' suggestion that AI could one day make battlefield decisions

Boolian

AM I AI

Artificial Military Intelligence or Artificial Intelligence?

There's an an oxymoron in there somewhere, or at the very least, a moron.

I'll assume AI will scrape the back catalogue of military tactics throughout the ages; in which case it will be a very short scrape, and very simple maths to code, as a zero is all that's required to sum.

If AI drives humans to extinction, it'll be our fault

Boolian

Wonderful One Hoss Ai

Beyond being responsible for a singular catastrophic event (MAD armageddon?) the argument appears to be; that AI will be integrated seamlessly, without flaw, into every aspect of civilization; further, that AI itself will never break down, except catastrophically in every direction simultaneously.

That's the old 'Deacon's Masterpiece' then

https://tinyurl.com/2mxjjzsx

Computing, and code is already integrated deeply into the modern world, and has always had flaws, but resilience is in the fact that components of the system break down, but never globally, and simultaneously (yet) they fail in a modular way - servers here, subsea cable breaks there, CME events, bugs, cyber attacks, faulty code, user error. It's varied in it's failures - but also varied in continuous, iterative maintenance.

Failures can (and must) occur, but there are usually some forms of mitigation, because we have had years of experience of expecting component, and system failures. It would have to be shown that AI is not, and will not be subject to intermittent 'modular failures' and that remedial action will never be required- a Masterpiece indeed. That's patently not the case at present, because we can point to them on a daily basis already.

We are already in a mitigation process for AI.

NASA to tear the wings off plane in the name of sustainability

Boolian

Going Boeing Gone

There is what you aspire to, and who you turn to in order to achieve what you aspire to. One of these things is not like the other. The words Boeing, Budget, and Decade' sort of hang there, in much the same way a brick doesn't.

High aspect ratio, trussed wings have been floating around a long time - literally, floating around the skies - because they were actually built, and flown succesfully more than half a century ago, with many iterative designs knocked out annually since.

This particular 'modern' take on the concept has been knocking around Boeing's desk for a decade already but getting around to actually building one? Beancounters have already said "No, wait 'til someone else ponies up, and use something that's knocking about the back of the cupboard - there's an old, pimped DC9, use that"

This project may well be obsolete the day it's rolled out, it's not like there isn't a hulking great precedent for that somewhere, and if you have been exploring this for a decade already, and talking another *decade for delivery, then that's the past, not the future. (*7years at the latest, honest guv', we pinky swear)

Ahh, you know what, I'm tired of being cynical, good luck to all, and I'll cheer for a brave new dawn of aviation - now I'm off to practice getting the the right inflection on that sentiment in front of a mirror.

Why can't Nvidia boss Jensen Huang escape the Uncanny Valley that makes AI feel icky?

Boolian

Valley Harking

Obligatory creepypasta:

"The existence of the uncanny valley implies that at some point there was an evolutionary reason to be afraid of something that looked human but wasn't. It never disappeared, it just got better at looking human"

Sysadmin and IT ops jobs to slump, says IDC

Boolian

Advanced Cull Call Us

Been, seen, done - its the same old M.O

It's another generational cull a-coming. It happens periodically, under different banners, but it's to get rid of swathes of the 30+,yr olds who know where the bodies are buried, and to re-invent the wheel in their own glorious image. Oh, and the money, the lovely money they can take off the balance sheets (temporarily) and lower the rate of Permie wages.

It's not that the club wielders have any nous around who they should be culling, keeping, or hiring, they'll just keep swinging.

Then they'll be in trouble (again) because, it was great to use the new paradigm buzz-words to cull, but when it comes to what that actually means, for hiring to implement the grand new vision - clueless - so, they'll call the Agencies, who will pick up the phone and call the Contractors.

My advice is the same if you are getting long in the tooth: form an Agency with a few experienced colleagues, and/or prepare to brush up on your IR35, and blow the dust off your Contractor expense sheets.

The job doesn't change, only the tools and the names change.

This ain't Boeing very well: Starliner's first crewed flight canceled yet again

Boolian

Trouble Looms

I believe the tape is quite adequately non-flammable on outer surfaces - It was implemented to prevent chafing of wires from the outside, to maintain the integrity of the wires, and to not go whoomph if you put a match to it - even in oxygen rich environments - it passes those tests.

Someone, somewhere, asked the question - "what happens when the wires chafe from the inside?" The answer was: 'possible spitzensparken, which could possibly ignite the adhesive on the inside'

Oh crap. But possible, not probable right?

'We gave it a try'

aaand?

'it went whoomph...'

Oh crap..

Now, as anyone who has had to do it will tell you, that's a total stripdowm of an auto to get the wiring loom out. Honestly, for a spaceship (or capsule) you'd be as well just building another one, if it is deemed a potentially fatal flaw.

As for the chutes - you toss your plastic soldier & parachute out the bedroom window all day, and see what configurations work. Or in this case - drop your capsule from an expensive height, until you are satisfied - the operative word being 'expensive'

Cheaper to model, and then say 'Oops' later.

US Air Force AI drone 'killed operator, attacked comms towers in simulation'

Boolian

Little Feature

Brilliant. That's the most human thing I've read about AI , and gave me a much needed laugh.

Working as intended.

1. This crypto-coin is called Jimbo. 2. $8m was stolen from its devs in flash loan attack

Boolian

Stolen Stollen

Yeah, struggling to seen what was stolen, a share of unbaked cake, a share of the idea of cake. Jimbo.2 wasn't stolen, Ethereum wasn't stolen.

errr....

No wait - they bought Jimbo2-Coin from Jimbo2, with a loan of Ethereum-Coin borrowed from Etherium and sold the Jimbo2-coin back to Jimbo2 in exchange for it's value in Etherium-Coin, and paid Etherium back in Etherium-Coin?

In between buying the Jimbo2-coin, and selling it back, the 'value' of Jimbo2-coin went up (and presumably went down afterwards) and they shoved the difference (in Etherium-Coin) in their wallet.

*cough "the value shares can go down, as well as up" - or is it the other way around - meh.

Well, isn't it Jimbo2 who has the Jimbo2-coin - why are they looking elsewhere?

Nothing was stolen - maybe there is some kind of regulation against 'pump & dump' manipulating prices -so the perpetrators engaged in a crime, but the crime wasn't theft, was it? Shurely not.

Same-same with Fiat currency.

Who set the rate of Jimbo2-coin? The 'Market' or Jimbo2? I think it was Jimbo2... or Jimbo2's automated system - well get the system to put the value up again when no-one is looking...

If it was 'The market' well, 'the market' can shift the share price up momentarily to cover the difference. ad-infinitum - unless the market doesn't give shit about Jimbo2's woes because 'unregulated man, code is law - no luck'.

Isn't crypto better suited to clawing back, or freezing 'manipulated money' anyway - isn't it on the Chainz™ Doesn't it have a serial number?

"These serial numbers are considered 'counterfeit - do not process any transaction with these numbers, any transaction made with them is now void (press enter)

What about wallets, at least tell me the Chainz™ know what wallet the 'value' went into - can you create, and bin anonymous wallets on the fly all over the place, or can wallets get fingered as ' hot'?

At least that way, it's not just Jimbo2 trying to get 'value' back - a lot of other traders will be hunting the 'value' of their now void transactions too, and also keeping an eye out for anyone brandishing a wallet that says 'Mean Muthafukka'

Soooo many rhetorical questions.

High Finance, and Crypto - buggered if I know how it works - that's why I'm poor.

Windows XP activation algorithm cracked, keygen now works on Linux

Boolian

Too late the hero

Don't ever connect?

I discovered at least one XP machine in the extended family running last week. To date, it hasn't been compromised by anything, or at least anything immediately apparent.

It may well be a lovely node on a botnet, but no ransomware encryption nasties have infected it, and the operators have not had entire lifesavings sucked out their banks, or online accounts hijacked.

Bizarre, but true. You'll be asking "May be part of a botnet? Don't you know - haven't you nuked it from orbit!?" Well, I haven't bothered to look at it any further than a brief perusal out of morbid curiosity. A day, or a week is going to make not a blind bit of difference at this juncture, whether I take it out the back and shoot it, or not - besides I'm meant to be retired from all that nonsense.

Security is hard, and you'll never patch all the holes in anything. My time in IT gave me PTSD, and the understanding that the advice is: 'never connect anything to the internet' - never mind WinXP. It's naive to think 'Hey I'm all patched up today - no vulns for me"

Hell, even an airgapped machine will get royally screwed the minute a grunt gets a hold of it - there is absolutely, unequivocally, zero defence against stupidity.

Best you can ever do is have backups, and go home for a pint. Some survive the battle for a while, in the same way a dandelion survives the mower - dumb chance. You can swerve around all you want, heroically running from the treeline every day, if you feel it helps. 'He killed 15 zero-days single handed...30, if you like'

Yeah, that XP machine has to die, of course it does, though some twisted part of me wants to leave it operational, and to snoop the bejeezus out it, just to see what myriad nasties are operating in there - and if there are none - how in the seven hells there aren't.

Professor freezes student grades after ChatGPT claimed AI wrote their papers

Boolian

See me

The article probably only had parts written by AI - if the lack of punctuation, mispunctuation, and an apparent truncated/ missing paragraph is anything to go by.

6/10

Twitter adds new DM features, and Musk claims encryption is here, starting today

Boolian

Re: Musk says

Best to redefine that bet before everyone takes your money. A Starship has already flown and landed a few times.

A Starship c/w Booster, not so much.

It's time to reveal all recommendation algorithms – by law if necessary

Boolian

Algohol abuse

Algo working as intended.

There were 5 pair of decrepit eyes on the board. Talking rando nonsense about the weather and carburettors.

There is a zero chance of those eyes engaging to view/click/buy. Solution : Inject some rando, irritating disturbance, bearing no relation to meteorology, or the finer points of stochastic venturi effects.

(waits for wry smiles at the setup pun...no? Please yourselves then)

You now have 20+ pair of eyes on the board engaging to vent their ire. One pair will be a Goldeneye.

Hello Mr Product seller, have a look at our metrics this month - user engagement is up across the board - sign here...and here.

You will get bonus points for propagating engagement beyond the platform.

Yaaay now we're all playing. Algo working as intended. Well done. Have a cigar,

I'd recommend a nice Cohiba, form Havana House and a glass of Tamnavulin Sherry Cask (Tesco £45) have sit down in a darkened room with a paper bag over your head (preferably bespoke, recycled, available from Rocaba - now £10 off your first purchase) at least until the palpitations subside - Fibricheck do some nice heart rate monitoring solutions which can help with that.

This post brought to you by Google Sponsored Ads and the letter "A"

Have to go now - according to my Tag Heuer Formula 1 x Gulf, it's time to check in on the Mayo clinic about this worrying growth I've been reminded about...somehow.

The Moon or bust, says NASA, after successful SLS/Orion test flight

Boolian

Caining it Moonward

So they indeed blew the bloody doors off while upgoing - nice

Is the heatshield a worry downcoming? Well, "less than expected" can still mean "more than required" The heatshield is still trusty AVCOAT, but the ablative structure's new manufacturing, and assembly process had been modified.

Modifications from known data, means it's one of those 'known, unknown' thingies..They know AVCOAT works, and they know how well it worked in a past configuration (Apollo) The new configuration and process is (was) unknown - they had no data for it, and was therefore (gulp) modelled.

The data returned did not match the model.

What did they do differently? Different bonding, and production line modular manufacture - the Apollo era heatshield was handcrafted and bonded, in a time consuming process. The new configuration worked though, so there is that going for it,

What else? Well, before we decry the modelling for the heatshield performance, we should mention the novel, modelled 'skip entry' - that worked great. It was intended to reduce the stresses of downcoming, including heat stress; so I'm wondering if the "less than expected" relates more to the modelling of reduced heat, and stress with a skip-entry, than to the performance of the ablative heatshield.

The Artrmis mission remember, was coming in hot - damn, hot, real hot! Hotter than a hot thing on planet Hot. Beyond known heat stress data is what I'm getting at.

So, despite the discrepancies in modelled data, and expected performance, both the skip-entry and ablative shield was well done - no astronauts would have been well done, or skited into the black and well gone.

Still an horrrendous waste of money,

German Digital Affairs Committee hearing heaps scorn on Chat Control

Boolian

Hey, Sam...

"We would like you to implement a multi tier system, whereby upper echelons (TBD) have access to E2E encryption, lower echelons (TBD) have access to E2E encryption with keys held in escrow (available to higher echelons) and lower echelons(TBD) have no access to E2E encryption whatsoever.

E2E encryption should be monitored, and echelons engaging in E2E encryption, utilising software which may facilitate E2E encryption outwith their designated tier, or wearing loud shirt in a built up area, or standing in a spotlight and not looking right, should be identifiable to upper echelons- can you do this"?

"Sure", you'll have to make it fly though, not me - are we done? Good, that'll be (insert ludicrous amount) for consultancy time - Now, I'm away fishing.."

There, that wasn't so difficult now was it?

Page: