Re: Another frivolous case
"However, unless they have evidence showing that Amazon had been made aware of this particular product and then failed to act"
The judge's order references this multiple times:
e.g.
"Amazon failed to properly inspect John Doe’s camera three times—including an inspection by Amazon’s Product Safety team tasked with preventing the type of harm alleged here. ... (looking to the
defendant’s conduct in light of its own policies in duty analysis). Despite these inspections, Amazon approved the camera"
"These allegations raise a reasonable inference Amazon sold a camera knowing it would be used to record a third party in a bathroom without their consent."
"Despite these inspections, Amazon approved the camera. ... Amazon then exercised control over the camera’s product description—including over the photographs encouraging using the camera in
a private bathroom as a towel hook. ... Amazon then promoted the camera. ... Throughout all this, Amazon knew hidden cameras were used to spy on individuals in private spaces. ... Collectively, these allegations “permit the inference” Amazon knew its actions and omissions might expose others to a foreseeable high risk a third party would use the camera exactly as advertised—to surreptitiously record an individual in a private bathroom by using the camera as a towel hook."