
(...) Flowers
If all vehicles suddenly had zero emissions, what percent reduction of total carbon would be achieved ?
Asking for a friend.
30 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Dec 2021
As G. K. Chesterton said over a hundred years ago,
“Too much capitalism does not mean too many capitalists, but too few capitalists.”
“The big commercial concerns of to-day are quite exceptionally incompetent. They will be even more incompetent when they are omnipotent. Indeed, that is, and always has been, the whole point of a monopoly; the old and sound argument against a monopoly. It is only because it is incompetent that it has to be omnipotent. When one large shop occupies the whole of one side of a street (or sometimes both sides), it does so in order that men may be unable to get what they want; and may be forced to buy what they don’t want.”
Nothing has changed. Monopoly usually becomes anti-economic.
Not being all expert all the time, we have developed a sense of what’s probably OK and how far to trust, based on the assumption the originator is human.
All this has to be revised now that the source is a statistics based computation. There is no social guard rail. Maybe more rigorous habits are needed.
In my experience the book is utterly practical. There is no heavy jargon or pseudo-intellectual nostrum making. It really does provide principles for problem analysis and solution synthesis or design. Code becomes more economical, less buggy or even bug free, clearer and more maintainable. It is language independent.
Like Lego, but for audio ;), a surprising and beautiful application of the idea of signal approximation by (finite) expansion in terms of a chosen set of basis functions (Lego - bricks, Floppotron - drives etc.).
One could consider following through formally - perhaps Zadrożniak has done this - and writing an algorithm which would, given a piece music, compute the coefficients of the basis expansion and output the connexion matrix for the basis elements.
Perhaps also one could combine Lego and Floppotron by connecting the basis elements with mechanical linkages so that when the music began to play, the assemblage of Floppotron elements would configure themselves à la Transformers into a robot that would dance to the music it was playing.
https://youtu.be/6CTR3d2Ly80
Why pixie dust sometimes is the only way to keep hope alive
On the dynamics and evolution of some sociotechnical systems, Elliott W. Montroll, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S.) 16(1): 1-46 (January 1987).
pp 38-39
"On December 2, 1942, Enrico Fermi and his colleagues produced the first sustained fission chain reaction, demonstrating the feasibility of a nuclear power plant. By fifteen years later, the first commercial nuclear power plant was operating.
The highly successful space program was initiated only a few decades after primitive rocket experiments. Robert Goddard's first success in shooting a rocket over a mile vertically was achieved on May 31, 1935; twenty-six years later the Soviet cosmonaut was the first human to encircle the globe in a rocket-launched satellite.
The record of these successes has led the public, and even numerous scientists, to believe that with a little money and ingenuity, any desired scientific goal could be achieved. Unfortunately, this is not always true. Consider the magnetically confined fusion program which started as Project Sherwood in 1951. ...
...
I contend that the magnetically confined fusion program has fallen victim to the tyranny of many dimensionless constants. The great engineering successes of the past have involved processes which could, to a first approximation, be characterized by a small number of dimensionless constants. Hence only a small number of model experiments were necessary to determine the feasibility of a project and to estimate the cost and difficulties to be surmounted. Even the space program was broken down into a number of subprojects, each of which could be analyzed in terms of a small number of dimensionless constants so that the results of many independent model tests could be used as a basis of the required full-scale engineering designs.
I'm loving me the discussion of the "101-button mouse", an approach to navigating the desktop and its depths totally by the keyboard.
More generally, Jeff Raskin's book/extended essay "The Humane Interface" is worth a look. He discusses principles and measures for any kind of interactive system. At the end he presents ZoomWorld, a very intriguing "3D world" approach to the desktop,
What are the barriers to entry in this market ? It seems like "found suitcase full of money" for the right entrepreneur to move in and take market share by providing a product and terms - openness - that customers would want. There is no need to try to take every dollar that needs to be spent. As they say in the garment district, you can make money at the high end and at the low end.
If unix text editors were military aircraft:
ed - early biplane with one machine gun mounted on top wing; stand up in cockpit to operate
ex - early biplane with two machine guns mounted ...
vi - biplane with machine gun firing synchronously through propellor
emacs - A10 with nose mounted electric auto cannon and lotsa rockets under the wings