Re: Sighs are too silent for this
Well maybe you're right but I'm struggling to see the issue. If they are using (F)OSS it's not GPL or the like because those licences would be incompatible with BSL. That only leaves licences like MIT where the author has explicitly decided to make their work available for commercial use. Besides the code does become genuinely (F)OSS after two years, I'm not sure you can really call that spitting on the community.
At the end of the day, developers are not free. If a FOSS alternative exists, by all means use that. If it doesn't then either there's no demand for it (unlikely given Sentry have built it) or nobody is willing to build it for free. Sentry has to at least pay for the developer's time, admin costs etc etc. It's not rational to expect them to just give it away, surely you don't truly believe they should? Except of course they are doing, more or less. You or I are free to build it, host it ourselves, make changes whatever. The only people really getting screwed by this licence are the cloud providers and I'm not exactly shedding tears over that.
Without hyperbole or the sort of emotive language you've used above, please explain what parts of of what I've written above you disagree with?