Re: Yeah
It's a national securìty issue.
Have a billion dollars.
That'll do nicely.
222 publicly visible posts • joined 24 Sep 2021
I was contracting at a company and wanted to check an rf component website. The website was banned by IT. I requested IT to unblock it. I showed my mobile phone view of the website to my manager to support its allowed access.
Mobile phone access should be restricted but not a blanket ban.
I used flex/bison for one project as an initial, rather dirty solution.
I told my permie replacement only use if everything is broken. I doubt that they would understand it.
I am retired.
As a test engineer i tought myself how to use flex/bison for my amusement. My background is electronics not compsci.
Test chipse are an R&D practice to validate specific layout/design concepts. Often they are not completely functional. The will still need to be qualified.
Once the test chip is working it will need to be re-designed to be production ready.
They are probably 2 years away from from a real saleable product.
It could be a way to keep the design team employed as everything is to work first time. Somewhat unusual.
Is this movement of systems being done by workday? Or is it being done by one of the usual (poor ability) suspects?
It sounds ambitious unless being done by a good program manager, knowledgable staff and senior civil servants under a tight leash.
This is one question looking for info and the other crazy optimism.
I tend to write down the meeting decisions especially the ones relevant to me. TPM's tends to have poor memories and write things that are convenient.
My meeting notes are brutal and don't mince words.
So i refer to the bits i need. If they read the whole meeting notes i'm toast.
When testing devices on early devices you look for 3 or more devices that have the same behaviour.
With decent process and assembly you should get 5 or more same behavior devices. Hopefully lots more good devices.
Only having one device means cherry picking the device (usually the best one).
It sounds like poor yield and a crap device not somerhing you should make enginrering decisions on.
I've watched the movie and it's good.
It starts of with a training exercise to simulate lauching a missile. The man knows what it will do and tries to get command to stop it. I think no missiles where launched. E.g fail safe.
To guarantee launching missiles the people are replaced by a computer (WOPR). If that goes wong it launches the missiles. E.g fail dangerous.
What is the AI controlling? If it goes wrong does amazon ship a book to everyone. I don't mind. Does it bankrupt jeff.... i really don't mind.
For things that are really important multiple people in the loop is the right thing. Careful people with integrity as well.
This method is generally usrd to diagnose/fix design defects. Not for the faint of heart.
Remove the thick oxide protecting the die. Use a laser to cut tracks. FIB can be used to deposit moderate resistivity tracks.
You could wire HAP to gnd or vdd.
The lifetime after this process isn't good. You will find out what is possible. Is the device supposef to operate with no IME?
Generally only done in a failure analysis lab.
Some drugs are syntactically similar but have very different effects. Example penicilin (safe) penicillium (dangerous). Since AI counts tokens and doesnt really count letters (how many r's in strawberry) extensive checking of multiple adjacent tokens is critical.
This is dangerous.
There are 7 standard ciphers. Only some are allowed for each country. A temporary move to a differeny cipher would be a short term fix.
I would hope that the manufacturer left space for an upgrade.
Best to redesign with a software updateable algorithm.
The genie is out of the box.
Somebody could have a receiver tuned to the LO adjacent to the standard transciever to catch illegal transmissions.