I'm onto you
Do you happen to have a penchant for leather jackets, by any chance?
121 publicly visible posts • joined 17 Sep 2021
Well, I installed it out of choice.
Sure, there were some issues at first, but it's run fine for a while now. And yes, some stupid UI changes haven't been reverted (and some likely never will), but there are enough ways around almost all of them.
Windows 11 is how I like my OS now.
While Microsoft should be able to do this quickly and cleanly:
1. It's in the developer build. Complaining about lack of polish there is silly.
2. You [better program of choice] attitude is silly and mute when this is about a program that's very reason for existance is to be as minimal possible. The author here even mentioned that.
3. It's not a program for coding. You can do that sure, but that's like using a Renault Cleo to tow a caravan.
4. No one but a few anoraks care that your program of choice uses GTK3.141 or whatever.
Only some shinkansen stations have gates and barriers between the platform and the track. I don't think any of the minor shinkansen stations do, and not all major stations (one(ish) per prefecture) do either. Hell, the Tokyo Metro probably has more.
But yes, they do always stop at the designated spots.
That when the US did it, there were no humans at risk from it. And yes, it was still very irresponsible then, but considerably less so. And being a first, it was a mistake as is often the case.
I was going to type that in my reply but I though that as a reader here that you'd have the brains to think of that yourself.
If that were the case, they could have at least told other countries and perhaps even discussed what to do with it.
Considering the value of that altitude of orbit, ither countries may even have been willing to help.
No, this was a bizarre show of 'force' that wasn't necessary and was high irresponsible. Par for the course for the Russia of today.
The Americans shot down a satellite at a put lower orbit that was a potential risk if left alone. Of course it was convenient target practice, but the orbit means that very lottle debris remain in orbit and only for a few months.
It's not comparable to what the US did decades ago, or the what the Chinese did not too long ago and Russia just did.
India were a bit reckless with theirs, but theirs was also at a low altitude.
So enough with the dishonesty from you.
China were not the first by a long shot; the US did it in the UK 80s (and not again at such an altitude as even then it was a reckless, selfish, irresponsible, and self-inflicting thing to do).
China were just as grossly irresponsible as Russia have just been. The difference being that they seem to have learned their lesson (likely because if their own space endeavours - also at risk from this).