Re: Green
As someone once pointed out, the only way to be certain of a computer's security, is if it's buried in concrete, and powered off.
609 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Sep 2021
Cars aren't meant to be using GPS to work out how far they've traveled. Every one I've ever seen uses wheel revolutions, speed, crankshaft, or some other set of physical sensors indirectly connected to the road to work it out.
If Tesla is reporting something that it has incorrectly calculated by using satellite data that's known to be flaky on occasion, that's not just a cock up, that's a fundamental misunderstanding of what an odometer is supposed to be.
"convince customers"
Spend too much time trying to convince them to work differently, and watch them become former customers :( It's a bit annoying really, but some people like to pay for things that are freely available, just so they can easily blame someone else when the computer eats their homework/whatever.
The actual definition in that 13000 regulation he's "repealing" is approximately 30 words long. The rest of the document is devoted to justifying the definition, explaining how it meets with the various requirements, why they're making this definition, why safety showerheads are specifically exempted, and much other exposition. There's even a bit about how the definition of showerhead is somewhat circular. 90+% of what he's getting rid of is discussion, not definition.
Repealing this definition means that new chemical safety showerheads may now have to meet the 2.5 gallons per minute restriction. Not a good idea, as the point of them is to wash and dilute chemicals off of people FAST.
I have a vacuum cleaner (US) that proudly claims the amperage in big numbers on the front. Not that it's particularly efficient, but it sure does use those amps. Some of them are used in heating the cord's wall plug during use. It's lasted a good 20 years though.
Difficult to prove, as the requirements are more than just "lower price than cost of manufacture". From the FTC's website on it: "Although the FTC examines claims of predatory pricing carefully, courts, including the Supreme Court, have been skeptical of such claims."
It's not really selective enforcement, it's more like "hardly ever successfully prosecuted" in the US. #FreeMarket, etc etc
The problem isn't that HP printers clog with 3rd party ink... I've been using 3rd party ink in an HP for years now. Deny firmware updates every time they're offered, and that's enough to keep them working.
They just refuse to print with it. You're solving an imaginary problem with an imaginary solution.
That's one person, and Brother has since claimed that they are not stopping 3rd party toner usage. The below has a pretty in-depth report on what Brother thinks might have happened.
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2025/03/brother-denies-using-firmware-updates-to-brick-printers-with-third-party-ink/
It wasn't easy to work out the trade-offs, even given the ink cartridge cost and printer cost, it's still hard to work out exactly how much "printing 1000 pages" will cost using any particular printer.
HP attempted to solve this by making people purchase "pages per month" instead of "ink cartridges". This unfortunately moved the problem from e-waste, to customer annoyance and e-waste. And of course backlash from tech people who know that ink, while not easy to make, is not actually worth the same as luxury perfume per ounce.
I worked on the German translation of the owner's manual for a "Windows Printer", which was cheap because almost all of the processing of the data to be printed was done by the PC, and the printer was just sent the raster image directly. Didn't really catch on, because Windows at the time wasn't great at real-time processing.
Microsoft seems to have completely disavowed knowledge of such a thing, but it definitely existed. Note: Microsoft Windows is translated to Microsoft Windows, not "Fenstern", no matter how much I wanted to get that past the project review as a joke...
The only person I know who bought one, had previously worked for HP Enterprise/Tandem, so supporting a company he probably still had stock in made sense to him. Not to me, but hey, he didn't ask.
I still own one, and always click "no" when asked to allow firmware updates so I can keep using the 3rd party ink I currently have. Stupid that they actively add security problems to their security updates. If a printer can refuse to print due to "improper cartridges", it can easily do so even when "official" cartridges are used. HP will probably blame suppliers for shipping "counterfeit" toner, when it's actually on HP for being too greedy with consumable prices.
If they could easily work out how to stop people refilling their HP "large tank" printers with non-HP bottles, you can bet they'd start charging subscriptions there, too.
Epson may, or may not, have worked out how to do that with EcoTanks, but the solution there is to first refill the OEM bottles and then use those to fill the printer. Honestly though, Epson ink is so much cheaper than HP retail, that it's probably worth paying for the genuine stuff.
The bit about "initially admitting to the crime" is the dumbest part. US Court system is set up to encourage "not guilty" pleas even if guilt is fairly clear.
Most criminals, even when caught with plenty of evidence, still plea "not guilty" despite what most would consider "overwhelming evidence" because it's detrimental to their case to start with "guilty".
Every time this sort of thing happens, there's someone who doesn't understand that currency is a hard problem that has to assume the presence of bad actors who will take advantage of any scheme that can lead to more money.
Most national currency producers have worked out enough of the more obvious schemes to stop crime that crypto just ignores, with it's enabling by default.
The current firmware in our HP printer suggests we update it. I suggested "no", because it's not MY security that's being updated, and an insecure printer isn't really much of a malware vector on a home network. Either it prints the document, or doesn't, the only "communication" it really needs is "is print job done?" So far 3rd party cartridges still work great.