It’s a bank - why are they outsourcing development of their central nervous system?
Oh, I think I know why.
410 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2021
Eh? No one uses the billing an invoice as a canonical infrastructure manifest. Not only that, but it doesn’t go low-level enough to, and usually it’s a different department handling billing than Engineering - so that’s nonsense.
I rather suspect that their usage data is so (understandably) dirty as to be indefensibly unusable so they CAN’T share it with customers because it’s totally unreliable.
I’m just impressed that around ChatGPT version 5.2 it started to get most jq expressions correct rather than confidently but wildly wrong.
I can imagine consciousness, but then I can also imagine flying a helicopter made of jelly and icecream. So probably humans are terrible at recognising behavioural traits appropriately, in each other, animals, ghosts, robots, aliens.
I read the web page and the testimonials, it’s people saying that it helped the with a todo list. Or prioritising e-mails. One person had it write a website for his local sports club.
And… that’s it.
What is it allegedly for? (I know what it is - it’s the botnet of your dreams - a botnet with actual compute resource!)
Can you reverse a linked list in a computationally efficient way?
Can you avoid messing up a git repo when using rebase=true?
One of these things is very useful to understand well. The other is very likely to be the subject of university computing courses and literally never be required in real life.
No because it’s the public key that’s mashed. With asymmetrical encryption you can’t decode a payload using the public key which was used to encrypt it.
The generation of the public key from its private key is easy and not supposed to be hard. But changing even one bit of a public key makes the corresponding private key unusable and if you were to do a bitwise comparison between the original private key and the private key that corresponds to the modified public key then they would be very different.
Effectively, they don’t have the private key because they corrupted their public key and you cant derive the private key from the public key.
Hope that helps!!
Well, he’s obviously lying. It’s strange that he is seemingly permitted to mislead investors. His claims are bogus for at least the following reasons:
His robots will not learn from observation - they lack the hardware, compute, uplink bandwidth and software to do that. The ability to derive meaning through sequences of visual input is not there yet - by a long way, there is a big difference between ‘tell me what happens in this video sequence’ and interpretation of an environment and making appropriate real-time actions which modify said environment.
Humanoid robots are notoriously difficult to keep upright, even in flat plane environments.
The cost is impossible over the next few years. For reference, the parts cost of a lidr / optical sensory device with sufficient lightweight processing power is pretty high (see Apple Vision Pro - that’s ’just’ a headset and the parts cost is high). And you have a fully articulated robot with servos, motors, pneumatics, sensory sensors, batteries, onboard compute on top of that.
Not quite as ridiculous as his manned mission to Mars projections (which are so ridiculous that I think he uses it to gauge how moronic his audience is).
How’s his fully self driving car going? That’s following a fairly well defined set of rules and still doesn’t work reliably. Navigating and manipulating the ‘real world’ is very complex. They are nowhere near it, let alone a million robots in a year.
I’m sure they’ll deliver something, but it won’t be, or do, what he’s hyping. He is deliberately lying.
Hi Gavin, my name is Jenny and for that reason, I’m out
Hi Gavin, I’m Peter Jones, you should add big data and blockchain to it. I could have my devs knock that up in a day. I’m out.
Hi Gavin, I’m Touker Suliman. I think you need offices in London and I can rent some to you.
Hi Gavin, I’m Deborah. May I see your legal documents, right here and now?
Hi Gavin, I’m Gary Neville and no one knows why I’m here. For that reason, I’m still here.
40years ago… mmm.
Wanna invest in bonds from Enron or MCI?
How about Intel?
GE?
Meta will stuff up Facebook and Instagram soon enough. They’ll struggle to get revenue from WhatsApp. That leaves selling customer data and being an ad broker without owning the shop window.
They are inextricably linked to Mark Z.
I doubt Meta will be around in 20years, and certainly not 40. I hope.
1trillion USD is 10million x 100,000USD
There are less than 10 million Tesla cars sold globally, ever, combined.
Seems insane to me.
If I was the chairman of a company and someone said to me ‘if you fire this one person, you will save the company 1 trillion dollars’ the rational thing to do would be quite obvious. Or, if you don’t give this person 1 trillion dollars, they might decide to leave, I’d take my chances…
I’m not blaming anyone for putting their faith in a large privately (sorta) owned company who should do better for their customers. It’s a shame that BOSE didn’t guarantee the service for x years. That’s the let down, a trusted brand letting its customers believe one thing and not delivering.
Immediate cynicism required - ‘what happens when this gadget can’t talk to the Internet?’, and ‘can company X remotely knacker this product?’ are the two questions everyone should learn to ask because you’ll always find out the answer, either before or after you hand over money for it.
Why 3 times a year? Because they are paid the ingress cost and the compute costs and they don’t want people to flick the setting on/off/on/off. They already knew this would create resource issues in Azure so they set the retention to 30days anyway. I guess they don’t do a good job of remembering which pictures are already processed and so are worried about thrashing the upload/compute each time it’s toggled on/off/on. I bet the database backend ‘delete user’s data’ request is heavy and slow so they want to protect the backend. It’s a crap UX and suggests there’s a crap architecture/implementation behind it.
Apple have had this feature on iOS for years - I suspect the difference is that the ‘people’ metadata is stored on the user-device on the Apple implementation and not some central creepy database (Microsoft implementation).
We want flexibility….
Except it takes a few years between design to manufacture, and then you need a fab slot, and assembly. Which means you need at LEAST 3 years between ‘I want to do this’ and ‘this’ being a real physical option.
At LEAST 3 years without changing your mind or ballsing up the Project Management…
But it’s an easy thing for the CEO of a software licensing company to say.