Re: Icons - enjoy the choice
Cigarette for balance…
395 publicly visible posts • joined 18 Aug 2021
40years ago… mmm.
Wanna invest in bonds from Enron or MCI?
How about Intel?
GE?
Meta will stuff up Facebook and Instagram soon enough. They’ll struggle to get revenue from WhatsApp. That leaves selling customer data and being an ad broker without owning the shop window.
They are inextricably linked to Mark Z.
I doubt Meta will be around in 20years, and certainly not 40. I hope.
1trillion USD is 10million x 100,000USD
There are less than 10 million Tesla cars sold globally, ever, combined.
Seems insane to me.
If I was the chairman of a company and someone said to me ‘if you fire this one person, you will save the company 1 trillion dollars’ the rational thing to do would be quite obvious. Or, if you don’t give this person 1 trillion dollars, they might decide to leave, I’d take my chances…
I’m not blaming anyone for putting their faith in a large privately (sorta) owned company who should do better for their customers. It’s a shame that BOSE didn’t guarantee the service for x years. That’s the let down, a trusted brand letting its customers believe one thing and not delivering.
Immediate cynicism required - ‘what happens when this gadget can’t talk to the Internet?’, and ‘can company X remotely knacker this product?’ are the two questions everyone should learn to ask because you’ll always find out the answer, either before or after you hand over money for it.
Why 3 times a year? Because they are paid the ingress cost and the compute costs and they don’t want people to flick the setting on/off/on/off. They already knew this would create resource issues in Azure so they set the retention to 30days anyway. I guess they don’t do a good job of remembering which pictures are already processed and so are worried about thrashing the upload/compute each time it’s toggled on/off/on. I bet the database backend ‘delete user’s data’ request is heavy and slow so they want to protect the backend. It’s a crap UX and suggests there’s a crap architecture/implementation behind it.
Apple have had this feature on iOS for years - I suspect the difference is that the ‘people’ metadata is stored on the user-device on the Apple implementation and not some central creepy database (Microsoft implementation).
We want flexibility….
Except it takes a few years between design to manufacture, and then you need a fab slot, and assembly. Which means you need at LEAST 3 years between ‘I want to do this’ and ‘this’ being a real physical option.
At LEAST 3 years without changing your mind or ballsing up the Project Management…
But it’s an easy thing for the CEO of a software licensing company to say.
They are going to replace their existing infrastructure with a whole new unfamiliar infrastructure. They are laying people off now because, in the future, they might not be needed because of the new infrastructure they don’t yet have and haven’t built.
If you insert the words AI-centric a few times almost anywhere in the first paragraph, that’s a fair rephrasing of the CEO’s statement. He is either lying or is completely ignorant.
Is he actually saying ‘we are pivoting to being an Agentic AI frontend and all the Fivrr people offering their services are going to be made irrelevant’. Because that’s a terrible business plan too.
If I was a shareholder I’d be selling or lobbying for his departure.
18months? Re-orgs are part of what management does - if not that then how else would they say ‘we are not achieving well now, but we’ll re-org, leverage some synergies and then it’ll all be better’.
After the re-org it’s all a bit chaotic as people are working out how to do things and who does what, so that’s more time, then another six months of waiting before the next re-org to respond to the needs of the business/market or ‘better align with strategic priorities’ etc etc.
In many places, company senior management regularly confuse activity for progress.
It’s all a bit of a shame but not a surprise.
I read the through the bcachefs web page and reading the correspondence between contributors and the maintainer, it does appear that the maintainer enjoys being antagonistic and belligerently misses the broader points which his collaborators attempt to lay out in clear, gentle, and thoughtful terms. And that’s the correspondence with people who are direct supporters of the project’s stated aims.
Undoubtedly a very smart guy - but undoubtedly a pita to work with, a loss to us all.
Seems exceptionally technically complex for to achieve something so mundane and ‘low reward’.
If you’ve got the skillz to do this then you’ve got mad skillz to do some proper hack0z shenanigans.
Perhaps some dodgy gambling sites pay a load for some extra Google points?
What’s the profit vs opportunity cost?
Well, they’ve completed the requirements capture - replace 60years worth of independently operated and heterogeneous complex systems distributed over a continent without any downtime AND subsequently costed it without even contacting a supplier AND given the project a deadline - so they’re doing just great…