Re: WTF?
jake: ""Could" have been made operational. Not "was" made operational. Nor even "showed signs of an attempt" of being made operational."
Sorry, but it's just the strict german law. - "Not operational" may have been somthing minor the judge was considering. The big trouble comes from the fact that he illegally possessed "weapons of war", which is a major crime.
If you don't have all necessary licences, you can possess "weapons of war" (and other Firearms) legally only, if they are made totally and unreversely unusable, which needs to meet detailed specifications (nummber and diameter of drillholes, cuts with a grinder, welding...). And their are additional regulations to be followed. - And the laws get stricter every few years, so today you need to obey to much more regulations, you even have to report the buying and selling of such useless pieces of rusty chunk.
(I hate to live here in this overregulated bureaucratic germany, would like it more to be been born in Canada.)