Re: Every Futurama fan knows…
I thought it was the pirate planet. They all speak Aaars.
Channeling a west country acent there.
279 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jul 2021
The EU should be using open source desktops as should the various EU countrie's governments and they shoild be mandating the schools teaching using these tools.
By using the tools I mean that all documents published by and submitted to the governments would be whatever the defined open standard is. Companies and individuals would soon adapt if they wanted to comunicate.
Everything else would follow on after some initial chaos and 10 years later everone would wonder what the fuss was about.
"But he was elected democratically.
I don't get it, do you not want a democracy ?"
DT was elected democratically and so were the representatives of the people in the houses of government.
The problem is that DT has, defacto, taken unto himself power that apears to overide the powers of the houses of government. This puts him in the position of being King/Dick Tata which is the anthithasis of democracy.
If the presidency was a symbolic position (irronicaly like the UKs king) with possibly a convening roll bringing states together in common cause, or maybe had limited powers granted temporaly, say in war time, you could have an effective and balanced democracy.
Giving one man or woman overeaching power is always a problem in the long run.
Is it not the case that
The Canadian court goes to OVHC and demands the data.
OVHC say, sorry mate that data is the property of someone else (OVHF) and we have no physical access to it - go and talk to them.
Canadian court goes to OVHF and demands the data, and OVHF point out that the data is in France under French law and that thay can only release it if ordered by a French court.
The court can get stroppy with OVHC but ultimatly a subsidiary has no leverage over the parent that resides in a completly seperate juristiction. You cannot hold someone in contempt of court when they have no responsibility and no way of implementing the request even if they wanted to. The only circumstance a sovereign countries court can impose its will in this context is if the country (Canadal) is going to back the court up and bully OVHF and France.
That sort of approach is more the perogative of the good ol' USA under the Donald (Duck) Dictatorship..... (Sound of angry duck noise on the right.)
Speaking as someone who hasn't a clue..... What if you said to your potential suppliers - Guys you are the experts...we want a thingie that has these broad capabilities, that has a mtbf of x hours, is easy to maintain in the field etc. We wish to pay £ Z,000 per unit and we want #y units by (choose a date). What can you provide?
By the way the contract will be at a fixed price. You write the spec with our oversight.
If we are optimistic it may be, though personally I doubt it, that Mr Musk may achieve many of the targets but fails to achieve the full enhancement of the share price. Competition isn't going away and that will likely depress profitability.
In that situation the shareholders will have diluted their shareholding without shares growing enough to compensate.
Also Musk is a gambler who likes to go "all in". Sooner or later lady luck will run out.
What happens if he has a medical emergency (prolific drug use is hard on the body)? The gamble the shareholders have taken on Musks rabbit and hat tricks will be up shit creek with no paddle.
There is too much to go wrong and reliance on an unreliable single point of weakness seems a not daft to me.
I particularly like <MyPassword#>11 for this month.
What could possibly be wrong with this?!
In effect it is as strong as MyPassword# but if you are going to force me to change password every month, not allow me a password manager on my corporate system and not allow me to right it down then I have to have some strategy for remembering it, or I will frequently resetting the password.
Its a weird conundrum.
The markets see Trump as integral to the success of Tesla, and "tank" when there is a threat to his position as there is the view that he could up sticks and go elsewhere.
He is erratic (is this the ketamine talking) and may well do things that hurt his own position.
So, if he were to throw his toys out of his pram, as the biggest shareholder, he would be injuring himself.
I wouldn't put it past him, but it is good that the clear eyed Norwegians call his bluff. They are doing us all a favour.
I would imagine that when the led pulse is on the light is indeed very bright and that the sensors in the eye saturate. That would be fine if they desaturated in line with the light pulse but there is quite a prolonged after image whilst the sensor desaturated/resets. The result being that the average actual light intensity is reduced but due to the saturation of the sensor the visual effect is virtually the same as full continuous power.
Making the power free parts of the pulse longer will work at some point, but risks causing flicker and may give different results for different people. Actually just reducing the power should work.
BBC News - Fears over AI bubble bursting grow in Silicon Valley
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cz69qy760weo
Speaking as one who was around during the Dot.Com bubble this scenario feels almost inevitable.
AI is undoubtedly useful in certain use cases, but nothing is ever a panacea, and there a lot of concerns to be addressed.
Crazily priced valuations thought the industry are a big warning flags.
Circular investment should be illegal if it isn't already as it is only sustainably as long as the plates keep spinning.
The large quantities of power and of cooling (also power) required are problematic.
So far the valuations have held but it only takes a relatively minor shock to blow the stack of cards down. Don's deteriorating relationship with CHINA doesn't help in this regard.
The orange Don's trade sanctions are just starting to bite so the realisation that the US economy is weak could well be the precipitating factor.
Donald could well be the prick that bursts the AI bubble.
I am pleased that Mr Nadella will now have time to "Visioneer" the future - presumably like engineering, but staring into the near future.
Anyway it will clearly be better than his predecessor who only managed to envision the future, while Old Bill and his mate just visulised the possibilities.
! ! FFS ! !
"I am not sure that is the case. There have been plenty of disreputable presidents in the past.
Perhaps not quite as disreputable as this one.
He seems to combine small minded petty vindictiveness with a complete lack of empathy and ..... Well actually a display of all the traits of a psycopath to a high degree.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychopathy