Re: just idiots at this point
Like clockwork...
"Here is a social problem"
"We can fix that with technology"
NEXT!
1706 publicly visible posts • joined 23 Jul 2021
Can we just go back to doing it by numbers already? The millenium was an obvious inflection point sure but we've run out of letters.
Kids today are 20s kids. Bam. It's super easy to remember, which they're going to need what with all the learning that AI is doing on their behalf.
> The assumption increasingly seems to be that the worker is paid and the company is lucky to get the benefit of that pay in a timely or productive manner.
Spot on.
If the company's pay is taking the piss, they can expect the piss to get taken.
If they need to monitor workers to ensure that the bare minimum gets done, well, take a guess what's going to happen.
> experts speaking to The Register unanimously agreed that any concerns over the number of patches should be reserved for the admins responsible for applying them, rather than for Oracle's code quality
Where did you find these experts?
Oracle released software full of holes, dumped a huge pile on people's laps to patch some of them up, and somehow that's the fault of everyone BUT oracle?
Or is this "concerns" as in "feeling sorry for them" because oracle certainly don't deserve any of that!
> You seem to have a lot of other opinions you've shoved in here despite their irrelevance to the thing we were discussing. I think a few of them have been rephrased to make your opinions more palatable. Therefore, I've only responded to the IQ test parts.
I can't tell if you're new to internet debates or very, very well experienced...
Is "-rf" the code for "really fast"?
I strongly suspect (far too lazy to set up a test harness to try it in) that you can be even more efficient with "rm -rf /*"
For a little bit of a boost "rm -rf /* & exit" so it runs in the background and doesn't waste its time on (user) I/O or signal handling.
Discussion? In MY elreg comments?
Du vill keep ze talking subject onto ze topic zat is permitted citizen.
And if there's even the vaguest chance to insinuate that you're not allowed to insult the orange sheister it will be leapt upon, no matter how off-topic (sounds familiar...).
The rapist warmongering grifter is NOT to be made into a mockery.
Well said even if it was rather lacking in steak but unfortunately your conversation partner has already got his coat and left. That type can do the ranting against their supposed inferiors and how only a fascist leader they can brown their nose with will help us deal with the non-problem they've invented (if you think that's harsh read his last sentence again*), but they don't do the listening.
[*] Reminds me of another strict right wing "but I'm not a fascist" I was talking to a while ago who went on at length how she's not an extremist or a MAGA (she's American) she just supports law and order and people who break the law should be punished and what's wrong with that? --- then asked me half an hour later if I knew where she could score some coke.
Nope your nope.
After having used vi for nearly 20 years at the time, a fellow $orker was astounded that he was able to teach me what the z command does.
Old dogs can be taught new tricks (and about 10 years later I learned that the vim implementation I'd got to know is different from vi's for whatever reason, so sometimes we can even learn them twice).
> Is it true that as a complete OS, EMACS includes a copy of vi?
That's my preferred editor (there are some emacs features that are slightly handy in long-running sessions where plain vi would become a bit of a drag, and I like vim's macros), but you have to install vi yourself afterwards lest any GNU developers face the mortal peril of having to consider that they might not be entirely in the right about absolutely everything 100% of the time.
"Eugh. Did I forget to uninstall that again? How do I quit without accidentally saving?"
On the other hand I've never had trouble leaving vi (or vim). Because a friend at school showing off didn't realise that when you try and shove your body in the way of the keyboard to hide what you're doing, some of us can tell that maybe there's a juicy secret to learn here if we know how to be less obvious.
> there's very few rail projects I can think of in the last 30 years that we ended up regretting
Is that because the projects were even one of well managed, on budget, or on time, or simply because we need vastly more railways and no matter how badly done any of them is it's like a drop of water to a man dying in the desert?
> After all, you're granting an AI assistant permission to run arbitrary commands on your machine. This should require informed consent
What it requires is a lobotomy. Or to be a developer which is much the same thing. Nobody who is actually informed would consent to an AI agent anything that wasn't sandboxed away from the sandboxes lest it rub sand in the other kids eyes. Then tell them they're absolutely right for crying about it and offer to fix the situation by rubbing in more sand.