There are really only 2 nations who could build and launch that detector
And they're the two most likely to break the treaty in the first place.
1026 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Apr 2021
Completely true, and no rival offers the same functionality yet.
There's a huge, commercial "but" sitting in the middle of that statement. If VMWare had kept it's old licensing terms or incrementally crept up it's prices, no-one would jump. Broadcom scared the horses and the stampede has started. This is about insulation from future shocks delivered by an unreliable partner.
Some interesting work being done by Frankenburg Technologies from Estonia on circa €2K anti-drone missiles.
The reasons for moving from the mainframe are not about the technology or value, they're about support and skills. VMWare has spent the last 20 years building their own mainframe and Broadcom are trying to monetise that but it's still 30 years behind System Z in refinement. If you're going to move from VMWare though, realistically you're not going to buy Z, you're going to go open source. That has a much smoother on ramp for recently graduated IT students.
I'm not military and I don't know much about drones but I'm curious about the line:
Sending British-made drones to Ukraine may seem redundant in light of the country's hard-won pre-eminence in battlefield drone technology
Is there an open standard for a) control systems b) sensor integration that means drones built now can later be upgraded to use different tactics or locate other targets?