Posts by DrSunshine0104 109 publicly visible posts • joined 18 May 2021
I am not a fan of the new look but god am I tired of 'flat' UIs and this finally might be the thing that pushes away from this design decision.
They are low contrast, sometime ambiguous buttoned nightmares.
If it catches on, there might be some good skeuomorphic themes for XFCE/MATE beyond a half-dozen unmaintained projects.
Exactly. This is a red-herring. The misidentification of the causal problem is propaganda used against the American public by companies and especially the federal government. Republicans are quite adept at using this but this administration in particular loves to use it.
The EU already has laws that would de-facto require MS to fight the US for said protections to even to operate in the area. Privacy laws isn't what Europe is anxious about, it is availability and over reliance on technologies housed by a potentially, hostile country. If a broader war erupts across Europe with Moscow-aligned nations and Trump continues to allow Putin to puppet his naive ass, pressuring him into placing sanctions on the European block, then it is no longer about privacy. European lives lost, the economy, and war effort could screech to a halt and the Russian bear could end up demarcating Europe again.
If they are really serious about this, they would consider breaking up their own company into create a European company.
This American is rooting for a European company to fill in this gap and would like to buy server space in the future. Better privacy laws.
And maybe a job.
I am in favor of using renewables but the silver lining (ignoring particulates, smog, etc.) is that biofuel's carbon that is already in the carbon cycle. The problem is carbon that has been sequestered underground for millions of years suddenly reintroduced to the carbon cycle in large quantities. Biofuel is almost certainly better than any fossil fuel. An imperfect solution is still better the status quo.
...And so continues the slow creep of where personnel management becomes less about managing people and projects, and more about looking at KPIs, and surveillance tech. Filling out paperwork to be put in the machine, now with AI(TM)!, where it churns out hiring quota and redundancies to protect shareholder's value.
This is the enshittifcation of management skills.
If they had any self-awareness, they would have come to the same conclusion....
You work at SpaceX as a software engineer, analyst, etc. and Elon pulls you off real work to go tilt at windmills in a sector you almost certainly know nothing about?
This person was the least productive or successful member of Elon's 'day-job' and they are being put there as a patsy for when this whole thing goes sideways. They are the political cover for when shit just doesn't work and congressional inquest is created to find out who should be blamed.
Sorry to Big Balls and his fellow DOGE-ettes but take some advice from this seasoned, career, US civil servant: start looking for another job now and don't claim this on your resume/CV. You walked into a political land-war as cannon-fodder and immediately stepped on a landmine.
I have seen an ad for a US bank, I think CaptialOne where the ad is just telling the viewer that they are using AI for business processes.
...Great. I guess. What is the corporate policy about binder clips or paper clips?
The only thing I am hearing is: "We are using AI to squeeze you and hard as we can and do questionable things with your money that isn't regulated and won't be because of US Congress and this administration."
Can't wait for the feature where CaptialOne AI is telling me I am not using my money as efficiently as possible and then show me ads where I can spend it.
If politics intersects with technology, it is still technology news.
You can disagree with the characterization or the editorialization of the article, and while I don't care, personally, about attacking Russia electronically, I do find the willingness of the federal administration to cozy up to Russia unsettling. I help operate and secure OT technologies and all the short-sighted, sometimes knee-jerk behavior that this administration has openly shown to IT security, its seemingly unguarded attitude to a country that has been borderline hostile for the last 80-100 years to be worrisome. The back-and-forth on tariffs, calling back fired federal workers, backtracking on policies clearly illustrates no understanding of the systems created or a lack of clarity to a purpose, which to me clearly demonstrates lack of expertise, callousness, and dangerousness through ignorance.
The idiot would be the person who takes unverified sources as truth and constructs their daily operations around water cooler gossip. But I would also say it would be foolish to completely ignore all gossip and not have it a part of your risk assessment. Assessing all the statements put forth by the federal administration, their actions, and any anonymous sources in the federal government, the position that Russia is considered less of a security threat by federal agencies or that wouldn't take active countermeasures is not fantastical assertion. I may not be able to do anything about it or change my day-to-day, but it does mean that I might be more on my own when it comes to mitigating external threats.
This administration doesn't have to be actively destructive to our national security to create issues, apathy is just as bad. You can argue not putting on your seatbelt isn't actively destructive to your safety, but it doesn't stop your face from being rearranged by a windscreen/windshield.
By using your own judgement and assessments, you should be able to determine the effort you should put into assessing the danger described by the anonymous sources. Should you panic and up your OT budget by 200%? No. But would 5-10% increase because of federal uncertainty be in order? Probably wouldn't hurt.
It was probably because your position provided IT support to research projects related to the DoE. If your hospital did research with nuclear material or a synchrotron, and if you did basic IT help with the computers involved, your wages could be partially or totally funded through research grants.
I have never handled a DoE grant; I have managed federal grants before and they typically allow for wages of support staff to be part of the expenditures. A grant that doesn't really cover the tertiary costs of the intended goal is really just wasting money. You would end up wasting $100k+ in idle workers, idle machines, and idle materials because your IT support is stretched thin, when you could have just spent 30k on a part-time or partially funded IT member who was hired to support the project.
My thought too. Why all the 'beautiful' tariffs but then axe the program that was supposed to encourage the semiconductor industry to build in the US?
Though the obvious answer is that he doesn't understand tariffs or is purposely not understanding/misrepresenting them. But I wouldn't expect an heir to billions made in the safest industry for investments, real estate, to understand anything about manufacturing. Especially when the person seems as intellectually incurious as Trump.
I live in the far corner from the Gulf in the US, so I would have almost no reason to put on a map publication. But this American GIS professional will never refer to it as the Gulf of America.
Tangentially, Denali is way more interesting word that an old, white guy's name. Noah Webster wanted to Americanize English so bad that he can almost be single-handedly attributed to drops of u's and s's in American vocabulary, but we collectively ignored native words which have made it distinctively American in an interesting way.
I would love if ESRI ArcGIS Pro could be run in WINE. Everytime I have tried it seems to actively check for emulation and won't run.
But ESRI writes some of the most brittle software with the worst logging.
They probably don't want you using WINE because nothing will work because of bad programming practices!
I feel like I will be talking to brick wall but...
As implied by the line of logic in my previous post. Trump's alleged crimes have had a grand jury, evidence and an indictment. If Biden has committed crimes and the same procedure is used, I won't really have a problem with it.
As far as my belief that Trump is a criminal... I mean Trump has no compulsion against admitting his crimes in writing or on tape, so it isn't a difficult stroll to arrive to that Trump committed crimes.
If he has done something wrong and a grand jury indicts him, or if the Republicans actually make a impeachment case against him that isn't absolute horseshit. Well, yeah I wont't be voting for him or lose my god-damn mind about it.
But the court of public opinion isn't really interesting to me, because I don't care about Biden himself nor am I interested in rumor-mill, school-age gossip. I am not emotionally attached to Biden or being right about Biden. Biden is human, I am human. I may have made a mistake about voting for him. But that doesn't nullify my position on Trump's indictment, my belief that Trump is a criminal, or my preference of political policies. Those are all separate issues.
All conspiracies theories fall into this paradox. The people behind the curtain are simultaneously the ultimate masterminds but also complete dunces that are obviously corrupt. There is so much evidence of their corruption but only bring forward the silliest evidence like Hunter's laptop, or complete hearsay.
I am an older Millennial, but I don't feel like I use jargon at all that much in a office setting. I prefer explicit instruction or definitions. I am not going to say EOD or ASAP. I am going to email that I need this at the end of the day on 5th of April or I need this as soon as you can deliver it. I also don't text or instant message much and when I do, I still use formal punctuation and grammar. I don't like ambiguity and idioms, jargon and initialisms always feel like weasel words or imprecise.
But a point of order. Are many of the terms described in the article actually jargon? They seem more like colloquialisms or idioms? I always thought jargon was very domain specific. Though, I guess one could argue that some of this is very business-generic jargon.
Also, are Boomers less likely to actually look or admit to looking up a phrase they don't understand? They are more willing to learn as they go or less likely to worry about a misunderstanding? I have told a handful of Boomers that are somewhat naive what FUBAR meant because they kept using in the wrong company or incorrectly.
The pipe dream that will never happen in the US is that changes to privacy notices should also NOT be retroactive. If you change your policy and I don't agree, then you cannot use my personal data any longer. It is a little concerning that company X can claim to be privacy focused, get bought out by company Y or simply change their policy and then suddenly all the agreed private data is suddenly sold to the latest LLM or start-up.
One of the first things they teach you in university economics is that the free-market works when both parties are willing participants. That is obviously not how health services work. I don't hold off on getting cancer because I want a new vehicle. Private insurance companies have a sweet deal because your are forced to do business with them with the threat of death. So, medical debt or death? I know what most people chose and we can see that by the average medical debt that Americans carry around. I don't know why we continue to pretend that the free-market works in medical service costs.
Perhaps, but then you spend 3000 to 10000 on medical insurance premiums, depending on your situation, family and employer. The you STILL pay for services rendered, depending on the service, and you won't know how much that bill will be until AFTER you had the service. And because your health care is tied to your employer, if you see better benefits at another employer, then you'll need to go at a minimum a month without health insurance, or pay COBRA which is ungodly expensive until the new employer's health insurance can profit off of your random bad luck and misery... I mean insure your health and well-being. Just don't get an life-long illness or something that needs monthly follow-up if you hate your current job or want to start your own business. Or hope you don't get injured during holiday or you will pay extra for not being a good drone and staying at work!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-wpHszfnJns
They want to keep me in business writing policies that disable all this junk. Can't let government data vacuumed up and set to servers not managed by the said government. And it is junk, this is just Cotrana with new tricks to show and just as useless for actual work... can't wait.
Then, for my wife's Windows machine I'll have wait for a couple months until enough people to bitch to MS to finally provide a off switch to their 'AI'. *Stares at the Bing Discover button.* I just need to suck it up and pay another 80 dollars to have actual control of the OS.
It isn't necessarily preferential treatment driving the petitions. Your are comparing four countries, two which have significantly lower standard-of-living and two with countries that usually measure above the US in almost all major metrics. It is far more likely that that a person from China and India will apply for a visa than that of a Canadian or German. As a person who works in the tech industry in Seattle that makes decent pay, I can still see why neither Canadian or Germans are clambering to come work in the US. People from those countries, in many ways have better working/life conditions than those of us in the US. All is not perfect but you are less likely to go destitute from random occurrences (ie. healthcare) or be exploited in Canada/Germany.
Also, you have to consider that everything may not be above-board with sponsorships from corporations. It might be cheaper to hire someone from overseas than to hire a native worker. They might be preying on a workers unfamiliarity of the US' laws and work culture to exploit them. This isn't a 'kids these days' remark but someone who is taking the risk to travel oversees for work might just be a more motivated work as well.
There is likely structural issues in the US' economy and application process that could be driving this phenomena, beyond Indians are gaming the system or foreign workers are getting preference. Use some thought or you sound like a bumpkin from my hometown with a chip on their shoulder.
The squads that may be on the ground in Ukraine may be posted out of a random military base in Massachusetts. Their chain of command would be out of the same base and would need to review on-going operations. The National Guard, despite the name and its traditional role, does a lot of operations oversees. George W Bush and his 'war on terror' revolved around sending a lot of the guard to Iraq. The US military is a large complex, overlapping organization so there is literally dozens or reasons why this junior National Guardsman would have access to this information.
NORAD is in a mountain, not at an airbase or in space. I once lived near US Midwestern Air Force base hundreds of miles/kilometres from the ocean and at least 75 miles from a large lake, but there was Navy personnel based there. Lots of places are chosen as bases for operations for many reasons, probably beyond our understanding or access to knowledge. I manage servers that live hours drive from me, but I still can do it from my home.
You know this is the 21st century and you are using a computer to communicate to people all over world from this site, right?
They should make SharePoint less confusing while they are at it. It feels like a decentralized mess without organization. You need to know arcane incantations to find the right site even if you have access to it. I own several SharePoint sites for project management and if it were not for the bookmark I couldn't find it. It doesn't appear in the organizational search when I look for it, but maybe that is user error.
People might take you more seriously if you didn't write a post like a feces-smeared, loon with a pinboard and yarn.
Did you have a thesis you want to share? What you wrote is nonsensical screed. This is for IT professionals or enthusiasts not whatever you are... 4chan slob or whatever.
I know the answer is certainly 'in the future'.
But can ChatGPT actually make an edit to a section of a text without having rewrite the entire document? Can ChatGPT make a rewrite to paragraph in isolation, make it flow or not change voice? I feel this would be an obvious sign of generated text for now, if it is even a hindrance.
I do ponder how many students actually use this. Is this a lot of noise for a handful of bad actors or is it actually problem?
To those who have used it in school... good luck. As an apprentice right of school your work you better hope you can fake knowing this stuff. ChatGPT isn't going to sit for your interview and you'll likely not have the experience to bullshit around the interview questions from the expert across the table.
I had refrigerator that was slightly older than I was (35 years) and I replaced it because it just seemed to run continuously at times and because of its age. I think the efficiency improvement mode an actual, measurable impact on my monthly electricity bill. 10 years would be the absolute minimum life expectancy for any durable appliance, clothing washer, dish washer, oven, motor vehicle, etc. If I buy a computer, phone, or component for general use at home, I expect at least 5 years out of it. Throw-away culture is absolutely out of control.
I would argue your emphasis in the sentence is in the wrong place.
"That's right, that combination of those two tones are illegal to [re]broadcast."
The creation of the tones, use of the tones, listening to the tones is not illegal but it is illegal to broadcast the tones in public.
Against all rhetoric the smooth brains that hear from Joe Rogan, Musk or who ever is empty media head of the year, speech in the US isn't absolute. It was more restrictive in the past in-fact, and more free now.
But waiting to hear about the Fox News byline stating that 'Biden's FCC is out of control and a tool for the nanny state'.
I come from a family where my grandparents are substantially wealthy (but I didn't nor have any of it right now) but my grandfather grew up extremely poor. Even he has seemingly forgotten the difficulties of growing up destitute. And REALLY doesn't grasp the amount of sheer luck that allowed him to arrive at current state as he subscribes to Ayn Rand's 'Objectivism'. (as a lover of philosophy if anyone wants to argue her tripe is philosophy, I will have a god-damn street brawl with you). I don't think the trope of losing one's self and changing because of you success is really unfounded from a person who has grown up adjacent to a very successful person. Not to completely discount his skill or intelligence, he is definitely a smart man who was good at his job, but he didn't do as much of the work alone as even he thinks.
Derek from Veritasium made a video that does a decent job of explain success blindness, especially when it is amplified through the culture here in the States.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3LopI4YeC4I
No more likely they are referring to you inability to understand for various and wide ranging reasons why a person might take a job you deem as beneath your quite obvious superior intellect, as you don't work for Blizzard or enjoy their games. I mean if you cannot understand it, it must mean it does not make sense!
But, no. You are probably only a decimal of competency that you try to pose. You shuffle through the day terrified that someone might ask you to prove your competency only to disappoint everyone. If you cannot even attempt to abstractly brainstorm a reason why people might to take any job or like doing a well-defined task repetitively, I really doubt your cleverness or competency. Having the maturity it examine one's own weakness and problem solve is an absolutely must on my IT/dev team. You are showing your ass.
But, I used to play WoW way back in the aughts, I have worked a position that paid less than my skill and wasn't handed a 6 figure income out of university... so you shouldn't listen to me.
I absolutely commented that this would happen when the original article came out on the TheReg. But did I imagine, at least from the description, it would have been so easy? This is almost as embarrassing as the time the governor of my home state claimed a news reporter was a hacker while pressing F12. https://www.theregister.com/2022/02/15/missouri_html_hacking/.
Someone wrote a toy software and the California government dropped the ball on due diligence and didn't have third-party auditors actually pen test the software. Though, I suppose the saving light is that it is only test bedding the plates.
*IF* I remember correctly in the US you can get out of arbitration if you petition the court to allow it. I think it is a pretty high bar it most cases but I feel an accusation of violation of Title VII the court would side on the protection of the plaintiff's rights and grant them access to the courts. You shouldn't be able to voluntarily sign off your codified rights to arbitration even if there is even only a hint of impropriety.
Mostly spot-on. A better argument from Google would be to say that EU count findings don't have precedent in Indian law. Which is a valid consideration but plagiarism? What a joke, sounds like Google is running the clock, trying to make it expensive, or written by a undergraduate intern.
At least in the US, most text produced by the federal government is copyright-free. Otherwise it would hinder the spread of government information. Imagine CNN having to pay to the federal government to inform citizen of a new federal law they are currently subject to. I would be shocked to find that the EU copyrights their text, or at least in a restrictive manner.
I have worked as a civil servant for quite some time and it is not generally laziness or I have been very lucky. Sure, you can find some lazy people but you can find that anywhere.
It is almost certainly budget restraints. We spend a huge amount of time tracking money, talking about budgets, creating budgets and finalizing them is a several month long process and money is always an enormous restraint in low budget departments. Which is fine by me, it is public money and it should be carefully used on things with the most impact.
You probably need to look at it more politically from career civil service perspective. The USPTO is almost certainly underfunded for the amount of work they do and even patent fees probably recover only a percentage of the actual cost of filing patents. I have worked in fee recuperated departments, getting more than 60% of you operational expenses recovered would be good. The fact is people will complain to the politicians about fees and because fees and budgets are controlled by politicians, you can rarely actually recuperate costs But appliciants less likely to complain from a general ledger line for the operational budget. While 2000 USD for a fee seems like a lot it would actually only pay personnel expenses for a single clerk for only about a single work week, no money for capital projects or copier paper.
Patent clerks are probably faced with the choice of getting through the queue or researching each fully. If the length of time to get a response on an application increases significantly then you'll have applicants ringing the politician. Most politician are there to showboat and don't have a grasp of operations, so their response would be to cut budgets which only makes the problem worse. Meanwhile, the companies that are targetted by patent trolls are targetted because of their money. These companies can afford these battles and to them the costs of the legal battle are often small compared the amount of money the generated through ownership of a patent. It is daft, but everyone is happier politically (which is more important) if the USPTO churns out patents than spends x3 longer carefully researching.
Why would TikTok be on government-owned devices in the first place? I am the admin for MDM in a small local government agency and we can afford such IT oversight and management.
But, I wonder if this is the case of making a statement and making it official, and there are nearly zero US government mobile devices with TikTok installed.
I grew up around Branson, Missouri in the States and could only wish that was true for billboards/hoardings. The 65 highway between Springfield and Branson, Missouri is a blighted, hellscape of outdoor advertisment. The adverts become background noise for the residents but they were always there...
For those not familiar and my UK brothers/sisters: Branson is the off-off Broadway for every has-been musician and actor to entertain Boomers of a certain persuasion. The roadways to Branson are absolutely paved with billboards for stupid show, conventions, and guns (very American).
Having worked for a short stint in the advertisement department of a large company, marketing is probably the least scientific of a profession outside of the arts. They would just throw money at shit and it was insanely difficult to track the actual impact. So no, there will always be a fool, and often the same one who will pay for spot that provides no benefit.
I am sure it has been pointed out before, but filing a FAA flight plan generates a public record that people can request from the US government. If people know the tail number of your aircraft then anytime it takes to the air with a flight plan, they'll know where and when you travelled.
If he doesn't want people to know where he is going, then he needs to avoid information leak about his jet, which would be insanely difficult. It takes dozens of people to maintain a jet and keeping them all from knowing or talking about the aircraft would be impossible. The same reason why conspiracy theories are fantasy.
If he wants to personally own a jet then he basically cannot leave US airspace and only fly VFR. Otherwise fly charter or commercial.
I have worked in state/local US government and still see fax machines quite a bit. I have heard the reasoning for this is because a fax machine is a end-point to end-point communications device.. The logic being (and completely ignoring the realities of modern infrastructure) that the data sent between the two parties was never at rest on a device not owned by the intended recipient and therefore not modified or copied. I have never asked our legal counsel if this is true or not. If so, it is probably just a case of the conservative lawyer culture or laws lagging behind reality.
Pretty soon Linux Mint is going to have to go full LMDE because it is going to be way too much work to get a convenient, working system out of a Ubuntu base. Or they'll relent and have Snaps enabled by default. I find it unlikely, they are constantly making reversals from Canonical and they enable Flatpak by default over Snaps.
Who is they and are they actually unified? You link to Elizabeth Warren's press release and article written by an unrelated reporter, both which seems to have slightly different thesis. I think it is a bit broad to say 'they' (implied Democrats) from your two examples.
Warren et al. are asking election equipment companies how they plan to protect elections while they consider financial considerations, their threat mitigation plans, etc. They are conducting oversight, which is their job.
The article, which seems to have no partisan narrative, is illuminating possible threats to the election process that the author has identified.
Finding and mitigating threats are not the same thing as a threat actually realised. There are lots of threats in our lives that remain possibilities and are not actually experienced. We buy insurance or wear seat belts, even if it is the safest car in the world(TM). We search for civilization ending meteors even though we will likely all be long dead before it happens again.
It is not a contradiction for Democrats to highlight risks to the election system but then determine an election was secure. If the election was compromised there was a certainty a flaw in the election process. But it does not follow that if an election was secure there were no threats. And this kind of thinking and lack of critical thinking is why American democracy is on the ropes
There is a 'slight' difference in someone or a group of someones setting up a guillotine with a Trump effigy and then thousands of people walking to Congress and pushing their way in, killing and getting themselves killed, vandalizing and stealing.
Then it gets more convoluted by the time you factor in American English dialects. Some regions of the US use autumn instead of fall. There might be a dialect seen more often by those outside and inside the States because of commerce style-guides, but there is a lot variation regionally in usage and spelling.
My only issue is people who act incensed a another culture using a different dialect of English. I can never tell if they are being contemptible or daft. If you have a middling grasp of the English language and reading comprehension you can almost determine the word usage through context.. It is is English. If there ever was a mongrel of languages, it is English.
The Register 
Biting the hand that feeds IT
Copyright. All rights reserved © 1998–2025
