Re: Serious questions
1. Installing another OS does not void the warranty. Every Mac, past and present, has officially supported installing a third-party OS. Apple Silicon is no exception.
2. Apple Silicon Macs natively support multi-boot. You can install as many instances of macOS as you care to partition your disk for, officially, and switch between them by holding down the power button at startup. Installing Linux instead is an analogous process. Our end-user installer will do the repartitioning for you (probably better than Apple's GUI-based Disk Utility, which is flaky :-) ), once it is ready. Our dev guide already tells you how to do it manually, and I have been dual-booting all my M1 machines from the beginning.
Boot Camp isn't what you think it is. It is not an "other OS" feature. The first Boot Camp was a CSM module (BIOS compatibility) for the Mac EFI firmware, to make old versions of Windows work (which were not fully UEFI compatible), plus a GUI-based install assistant. Modern Macs no longer include CSM, and modern versions of Windows (and Linux) are fully UEFI-compatible. Nothing called "Boot Camp" is required to install Windows (or Linux) on a modern Intel Mac - the "Boot Camp" tool is just a stupid install assistant you can ignore. They are just UEFI machines. You plug in a USB stick with a Windows installer, add the Mac drivers, and just install it. Same for Linux. There is no it "not being fond" of anything; those Macs will boot any random UEFI executable placed in the standard path on any attached storage device's UEFI System Partition. Just like any PC. I am writing this comment on an iMac Retina 2015 running Linux. From a third-party NVMe drive even; the UEFI supports those fine if you plug it in via an adaptor. All this weird "Macs are special" mythology seems to come from slightly quirky/proprietary devices and hardware features that somehow people construct to be "Apple not liking third party software". What it actually is is Apple not *caring* about breaking compatibility with third-party software; when they put in the effort to support it (Windows Boot Camp drivers) it works, when they don't someone else can do it (Linux Intel Mac-specific drivers, and everything we're doing for M1). The whole point of our project is we are doing exactly this for M1 Macs, so they *will* work well. It doesn't matter what Apple does :-)
3. Linux (and Windows) *already* run in a VM just fine (under qemu; not sure why everyone is waiting for VMWare and Parallels when open source tools already work - google "mac getutm"), but Linux in a VM will never have the performance of Linux on bare-metal hardware (e.g. native accelerated graphics). In fact, Linux on a VM on *macOS* is slower than it needs to be, because Apple do not use the M1's virtual GIC support, so their Hypervisor.framework (which all third-party virtualization apps are required to use) has a larger performance overhead emulating interrupts. Linux VMs running on Linux will quite likely benchmark faster than Linux VMs running on macOS on these machines, because yes, we already support some M1 features that Apple themselves don't :-)
4. Apple will iterate on their hardware and firmware just like they always have, and we will iterate with them. Some parts of the M1 hardware that we are reverse engineering have been unchanged since the iPhone 2G; some parts even came from PASemi chips, as I mentioned in the article. M2 is almost certainly going to be 90% identical to M1; in fact, those M1X leaks look like it's largely the same thing with another CPU core cluster tacked on and twice the GPU cores. Some chip generations will require more forward-porting effort than others, e.g. when they make a generational change to the GPU, but many won't. Apple don't go changing things up for no reason or just to spite third-party developers; all these changes are things *they* also need to support, and so they only do them when there is a good reason. I bet for a good fraction of Apple's silicon iterations, once we have the M1 baseline well covered, full support will take on the order of weeks, even perhaps a day or two in some lucky cases (just adjusting device trees, pulling out chicken bits, and perhaps a small handful of patches to fix things up - in some cases zero Linux kernel patches might be needed, just a few changes to our bootloader). A new GPU ISA will push the timeline to months, but they aren't going to do that every year, and that's just about the worst possible case.