Re: Microtransactions?
Audi has replaced BMW in that meme for a good few years now.
51 posts • joined 20 Jan 2021
> Thirty years ago, a Sega or a Nintendo knew its place - you turn it on, it works, no quibble, no updates, no IRQ clashes, no advertisements.
Consoles are still largely the same. Yes, they're now x86 PCs in a snazzy box, and they have updates, game patches and ads for their own services, but the games tend to just work. I haven't had a game crash on PS5 so far, and had *one* crash on PS4/PS4 Pro over the course of 8 years, and that's thousands of hours, probably into the tens of thousands of hours, gaming.
> However, the existing roads and Highway Code are set up for humans and they will need to be adapted to accommodate the self driving cars, rather than trying to make the self driving cars adapt to human environments.
I'd be up for this. England has some truly appalling road designs in places, and pisspoor paint replenishment levels. I find it far easier driving in America on the wrong side of the road than in an unknown English area.
More squares and less roundabouts, please. Even if I have no problem with roundabouts, enough other humans do that it's dangerous.
The writing was on the wall when they scrapped the stars system for 'like' - 'we don't have any bad content, just content you might not like as much as other content!'.
And the social-media style endless scrolling panels - 'keep scrolling, there's no end, just more great stuff!'
I won't cancel as they have enough good stuff (esp in 4K/HDR) that it'd be cutting my nose off to spite my face, but I'm not as happy about it as I used to be...
For me, as a tech nerd, developer and gamer, Windows 10 is brilliant, the best version yet.
It looks good, does everything I need it to, and doesn't crash.
I have absolutely zero intention of installing 11 until Win10 is completely out of Enterprise support.
Even then, I'll be modding it to look like 10, if there is no option for classic start menu/taskbar etc.
Because using normal currency in an FSCS-backed and fraud-protected bank and being able to transact essentially instantly via credit card/NFC around the globe with 0% FX fees (Halifax Clarity) is not good enough because....centralisation?
Get with the times d00d.
Relational database = bad.
Blockchain powered by graphics cards pointlessly sucking energy out of the planet = good.
> (How often have we heard that "we had him under surveillance but decided he wasn't a risk so we dropped it" in recent years.)
Quite, but reading between the lines, that would seem a failure of the legal system, not intelligence. They know these people need locking up or deporting, but can't act on it because short of planning or executing an actual attack, the courts won't let them do anything.
I think most software engineer jobs would come with company health insurance as a benefit.
I've looked at quite a few jobs over there as looking at the idea of migration, and all of them had company health + dental insurance. And more holidays than just national ones - I agree with you WRT time > money and I wouldn't take a job with only 10 days off per year, but many jobs offer more.
A lot of shade being thrown at the USA on this thread - some jokes, some serious - but from what I can tell, professionals can expect a higher standard of living than in the UK. Better pay, lower tax, cheaper housing, cheaper fuel. And way more flavours of Ben and Jerrys...
Absolutely - one very easy thing to do would be to simply *ask* girls/women why they don't (or do) want to work with computers. Maybe this has been done - but I've never seen such a survey mentioned in the multiple articles on women in IT I've seen. They just state the gender split, imply it's a problem, and leave it at that.
IMO, the vast majority of the gap seems explainable by natural average differences in interests - see https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19883140/ as one example of a study looking at this - there are many others.
So I think the answer would most often just be 'I don't want to'.
But of course we should work to fix any issues making up any genuine negative external factors.
Quite.
There's an assumption baked into these sort of discussions that the gender split of people interested in computers (and by implication any hobby/profession) should be 50/50, and anything other than that is therefore a problem of some external cause that needs to be fixed. That assumption is deeply flawed.
Stadia is an impressive achievement, yeah.
But it's for casual, or relatively casual, gamers only.
It's unusable on a standard ADSL connection when I tried it recently. Both lag and graphical quality were abysmal.
Even if I had a better connection, there's no way it can replicate the fidelity of, say, my PS5, given that HDMI 2.1 bandwidth from the console to the TV is 48Gbps. There's simply no way to funnel that through any remotely normal internet connection without massive compression loss.
I think most reasonable people would read 'the chinese' as 'the Chinese government' (and by proxy its supporters) or to be pedantic perhaps 'the Chinese political-industrial complex' not 'the Chinese race', in this context. It's the only sensible interpretation of the word.
This post has been deleted by a moderator
> But until they do, this kind of thing should not be allowed on the road.
Agreed!
I also think we're looking at the problem (human drivers) the wrong way - by trying to replicate human drivers on an individual level.
Sure, at some point software will be clever enough to better human drivers. But before then, as that may a good while away, we should utilise the other power of computers we don't have - networks.
Motorways/highways and cars being networked together so they don't have to look for other cars because they *know* where they are, seems a much lower hanging fruit than 'full self driving'.
You get on the motorway and the car syncs to the 'grid' and autopilot takes over - all cars can accelerate and decelerate simultaneously and agree on lane changes etc.
Though there is the obvious problem that it wouldn't be 'all cars' until it is all cars, but it still seems like a worthy intermediate step
> Thankfully, most humans can detect very, very slight movement in their peripheral vision, making your point rather pointless in this context.
As a motorcyclist, I can tell you this detection is not massively reliable in the context of actual road scenarios.
i.e. they may *detect* the movement, but then instantly forget they detected it after looking the other way, before pulling out and... 'sorry, I didn't see you'
It's also a known issue that humans are not as good at judging speed and distance of a single approaching light vs multiple lights.
For all the issues with 'self driving' systems - and there are plenty - this is one area that a computer could easily beat a human at, because it won't 'forget' it just noticed an object approaching, and it can look in both directions at once.
> In any case, lower-power miners are becoming available (Intel just released one, they know where it's at).
This just means more will be mined for the same amount of power. Proof of work systems will always expand to use as much energy as possible while remaining profitable.
Anyway - the elephant in the room.
Why?
I have yet to be given a single convincing (and legal) use case for cryptocurrencies. People harp on about decentralisation, but my very much centralised bank allows me to make an instant (for all intents and purposes) NFC payment on the other side of the world with 0% FX fee, upto £85k government protected savings, and fraud protection. It seems like a classic case of a solution to problems that don't, or barely, exist.
Ha - love it.
I still think we'd be worse off even without that factor. Too much red tape and a government hell-bent on outsourcing everything and losing money hand-over-fist in the process.
"What's that <serco/deloitte/acme>, you want two billion pounds to sit and think about the idea for a few years? Don't be shy, here's three!"
Quite.
I ask the same question of why building new 'normal' size nukes is seemingly such a difficult, time-consuming and hugely expensive task, despite the world having decades of experience building them already - see EDF and Hinkley, etc.
It seems like as time goes by, we* get progressively worse** at building things. Houses, railways, reactors and so on.
* - The UK, or at least England
** - worse meaning they are either of worse quality, or take far more money and time to achieve than before. For example, we spend a lot more money per km of railway than other countries with comparable geographical constraints. And, er, HS2...
> I'm really not a fan of these semi-autonomous systems.
Me either. I also consider them a solution to problems that don't exist, beyond the likes of ABS and auto-emergency-braking.
Driving just isn't that difficult. I don't even use cruise control, because having my foot pressed lightly on the accelerator is such a trivial inconvenience I have no desire to relinquish control of it - though fair dos if others differ.
If accident rates are too high then either make the test harder, increase penalties for error (we are very lax on driving offences in the UK and additionally people causing 'accidents' due to not paying attention are not criminalised as they should be - they are just civil insurance issues) or both.
This is until genuine, ultra-reliable fully autonomous driving is available, at which point, fill yer' boots and we will see a benefit in reduced accidents and less vehicles on the road through robot taxis.
There's more to it than resolution - refresh rates have got higher, panel technology better (so more colour coverage, contrast etc) and also Freesync/G-Sync for gamers.
But I wouldn't disagree with a general sentiment of stalling development, at least compared to TVs, where we've seen LCD get better at HDR, and OLED get cheaper and better over the past few years.
I assume a main reason for lack of OLED in the monitor market is the burn-in issue which PC use would definitely trigger vs video/consoles.
> Has anyone told Private Eye about this? (I daren't look at it these days, it's too depressing)
I hear you on that. I am numb to it at this point, after many years, so haven't cancelled my subscription yet. (Though numb != not care, at least)
One would have thought that the core 'phone' processes of Android (particularly on a Pixel, where Google has total control) would be completely locked down from other apps/processes to prevent, well, things like this happening. Would be interesting to read the details of the bug(s).
> Without Apple, Epic would still be shipping “you are in a twisty maze and your lamp is dim” text adventures for the C64
What on earth are you talking about? Ever heard of Unreal or Gears of War?
Even if you'd never heard of them and only know of Fortnite, only a minority of its playerbase is mobile - over 75% played on PS/XBox in 2018.
Ah, the test kits - the same ones the USA have thrown in the trash and were sold to us by brokers making millions in profit off the taxpayer just for arranging the delivery as far as Shanghai airport.
With their profit margins not even scrutinised by the Govt as they threw all rules out of ther window to let the pigs feed at the trough.
Perhaps because it has first-class features, documentation, learning material and community support - lots of good reasons to use it, if you want to pay for it. I assume most shops running RHEL are doing so for reasons more than just 'it's not MS', though I could be wrong.
Even if it's just 'cheaper than MS', then the same justification would apply to using SQL Server instead of Oracle.
I wonder how recently this has been implemented - I have a Samsung NU8000 bought in early 2018 that has no ads (not connected to Internet) nor spaces for ads.
I seem to recall it pestering me to connect it for a few weeks, then giving up with a whimper...
Thankfully, firmware can be updated via USB - and it did actually need one for an HDR brightness issue.
The problem is when will Samsung et al decide that no, nobody can possibly not have an Internet connection anymore, so firmware updates are only OTA.
Don't forget cancel culture also - see recent events https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/oct/28/sussex-professor-kathleen-stock-resigns-after-transgender-rights-row
Though the uni did stick by the lecturer here, at least, it doesn't paint a good picture if the protesting/graffiting students went unpunished.
They are nice, premium quality devices, but always struck me as missing a big enough target market.
Development work - clearly not aimed at that with the trendy but dysfunctional half-height arrow keys and lack of # key etc.
Professional multimedia - screen's too small
Casual touchscreen/multimedia use - just get a much cheaper Android tablet
Macbook crowd - already have Macbooks, not interested
As an MS-only member of the first category I wanted one until seeing the keyboard and cost - ended up getting a PCSpecialist laptop with full keyboard and normal size keys (very difficult to find these days) for 1/3 the price.
I've read a few articles on this and none of them have confirmed where the cameras were actually pointed.
Was it horizontally in the crawl space with no view of below, or pointing down at the cubicles/rest of toilet area?
One of those is a non-story, the other a big deal.
Ultimately us consumers must take most of the blame for this. We like cheap things more than we like ethically sourced products.
If AMD had tried selling CPUs that were more expensive and less performant than Intel's but 'made in America' they would have gone bankrupt. Not a case of 'preferring' but 'need to stay in business'.
You're right, mathematically speaking you're better keeping the £1 than buying a lottery ticket, but I don't completely begrudge people who gamble a few spare quid on lotteries with prizes of millions to be won.
With a £1 spend you get;
a) the buzz of watching the numbers to see if you win
b) the > 0% chance, however slim, of a 100,000,000%+ return instantly making you 'rich'.
c) miniscule detriment from overall return if you use all of your other spare £s on sensible investments
For some people, that's a good way to spend £1, from a) alone.
Of course if you start throwing many £1s at this gamble, the equation breaks down - a) remains fixed, b) only goes from 'really, really, really slim' to 'really, really slim' , and c) tends towards a significant detriment...
Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2022