Re: Article 5 is not optional
More likely he'll use their non-response (should he request one) as evidence that NATO is useless. His boss in Moscow would be pleased.
232 publicly visible posts • joined 10 Jan 2021
It's been three years since I had to deal with Sharepoint (I'm blessedly retired now), and I was going to keep quiet because of my lack of recent experience. But your post makes me think nothing has changed.
I think the lack of findability is not entirely Microsoft's fault. The problem is that in a hierarchical file system, there's only one hierarchy, and that's usually the boss's view of what makes sense (or his assistant's view). Which maybe makes sense to him/her, but not to anyone else.
I'm not sure what the solution would be. People have suggested tags, but here again one person's tag may not be another person's tag. You don't want to have variant names (dog, dogs, pets,...). So you need need a catalog of acceptable tags, which is maybe ok until a new project comes along. Etc.
Another solution might be letting each person organize things the way that makes sense to them, sort of overlay hierarchies (defaulting to the boss's hierarchy if someone doesn't want their own). Then where do newly added files go in your personal hierarchy?
Or keyword searching (where every word outside of a stoplist is indexed). Maybe with synonyms (like the Olde Google).
Maybe the Sumerians or ancient Egyptians solved this...
I went to Expedia the other day to rent a car. Between them and the actual rental agency, something went wrong and I couldn't get a confirmation from the car rental agency that they had my reservation. So I tried the Expedia chatbot. But it seems to have only two answers to every question: show me Expedia's copy of my reservation (which is where I started) or cancel my reservation. No way to get to talk to a human being. Worse, when it offers you a link to their copy of my reservation and a link to cancel, those are the only two things you can do; you can't even type into the box, because it's blocked.
Whoever did #4 at Expedia (rethought the customer experience) needs to be fired.
"Donald Trump's pick to lead the Federal Reserve, Kevin Warsh, has signaled he will lean on artificial intelligence as a key justification for cutting interest rates. In a December interview with fintech entrepreneur Sadi Khan, he described AI as ushering in 'the most productivity-enhancing wave of our lifetimes — past, present and future,' calling the technology potentially 'structurally disinflationary' in the same way the internet once was." -- as quoted in Financial World (https://www.financial-world.org/news/news/financial/30304/kevin-warsh-argues-aidriven-productivity-should-open-the-door-to-rate-cuts/)
I guess Warsh needs some excuse to push his boss's views on interest rates.
Next project: Make one that has lots of gears--they have to be brass--and has a pressure gauge for the steam. And I guess has an old 1930s typewriter looking keyboard. Maybe like this: https://thumbs.dreamstime.com/b/steampunk-typewriter-26624007.jpg or this: https://i.pinimg.com/originals/df/96/84/df9684377a296526de7191fda4d48494.jpg
Edit: Someone has done something similar (minus the gears and steam): https://www.aclockworkberry.com/steampunk-typewriter-laptop/
I have a laptop with a touchpad. I'm a touch typer, and apparently the heel of my hand would touch the touchpad, sending the cursor off to never-never land. I got tired of that, bought a Bluetooth mouse (< $10), and turned off the touchpad (simple setting). A wired mouse would of course work as well.
Terminator, maybe not a real threat. But there are enough real weapons (drones) being given AI-like capabilities now that could be a real threat. They don't even have to be very sophisticated--land mines (and sea mines) are destructive enough with essentially zero intelligence, and these drones have a lot more smarts than that. At present the damage a drone can do is limited to either personnel damage or building-level damage. It would obviously not be too difficult to give them much more fire power.
Of course these drones are not LLMs, but finding targets could very well be something where an LLM could be a useful component.
I am sure that the system needs to be replaced, but:
1) "At record speed" does not engender trust. (Although as someone else pointed out, it's been in the works for years.)
2) The fact that the contractor also built the Navy's combat radar system makes it seem likely that classified information will get into the new unclassified system. It's possible to put a wall in place to prevent this, but it also seems possible that the wall will be porous. ("Hey, Joe, a question for you. When you built AN/SPY-6, how did you handle X?" "Here, let me show you the code.")
"When asked questions, LLMs sound confident, whether or not they're correct." You know, that sounds like a certain president. Are you doubting that he has a human mind? If so, you might have a point.
I am no expert on the topic, but I have read that AI programs have been trained in things like protein folding and for other non-language applications but using more or less the same technology that LLMs have used, and have been reasonably successful. There also seem to be AI-type programs that are good at image recognition, and at generating reasonably real-looking (if not quite real looking) images (I haven't seen any six-fingered people in awhile). I'm sure there are many other areas where AI technology in the broad sense (not the LLM-only sense) is giving reasonably decent results.
So yes, there do appear to useful applications. And if it weren't for the over-hyping of LLM systems, we might be hearing more about these other applications.
"buzzwords that boil down to 'please buy our AI!'." Consider an alternate reality, where CoPilot was more analogous to Microsoft Office: you decided whether you wanted it, and if you did, you paid something for it. Instead Windows users have it foisted on them, whether they want it or not. (I almost wrote "we", but stopped because I switched from Windows to Linux a few months ago, precisely because I didn't want CoPilot on my computer.) And maybe there would be a free version on a website somewhere.
Had Microsoft done that, I suspect Microsoft would be the subject of a lot less complaining.
Adobe doesn't seem to agree with you. Now I probably have a similar opinion about Adobe as you do---in my case, I had no use for most of their products, and the UI on Acrobat kept getting worse and worse every year (I know because the place I worked for required Acrobat, rather than some other PDF reader/editor). But you and I aren't Adobe's target, it's people who need their capabilities and prefer not to use some other app that requires them starting over more or less from zero, and which might not give them all the capabilities they need.
While we're off-topic, I had a terrible time touch typing on my acer. I think the palm of my hands would occasionally touch the touch pad and send the mouse cursor off to who-knows where. Eventually I got a Bluetooth mouse, and disabled the touch pad. Now I type happily.
The cars I'd worry most about being hit by are the ones that make the most noise--the ones that sound like they had their mufflers removed, and the engine timing is set so they backfire when they take their foot off the gas. That's because those drivers try to break the speed of light, whether they're on the freeway or back roads.
Yes, keeping large companies buying Microsoft is probably their concern. And when other companies started making stuff that could pull IT budgets into their corner, Microsoft got really worried. But by building AI into the system they controlled--Windows--they figured they could prevent those other companies from taking their business away.
The other part is the old saying (probably older than many commenters here) that "Nobody was ever fired for buying IBM." And of course the new saying is "Nobody was ever fired for buying Microsoft." At least Ms hopes that is true.
From the article"...engine kill systems were pushed as an anti-theft device. But "the technology could also be used by hackers to cause havoc and could also be used by totalitarian governments to shut down vehicles belonging to 'enemies of the state.'"
Yeah, and all those inexpensive cars being built in China...
You guys (thames and not-spartacus) seem pretty knowledgeable. I served on an Adams-class destroyer (Goldsborough, DDG-20), and while they served well, I'm aware of two major problems: the 1200 psi steam plants were too hard to maintain (too complicated and using boiler controls that didn't hold up under at-sea conditions), and aluminum superstructures (which I'm told were an issue). The Arleigh Burke DDGs were designed, I assume, to fix at least the former problem; did it? What was the next generation of DDG-like ships supposed to fix, and did they?