The question is "which Intel are we fighting here?"
When this is called a "mini" I wonder if they are even close to what I do. My standard is to extend the ATOM and about $100 to do something simple, but used for one thing, because nothing runs. I have boxes from the 2007-2010 boxes which run motion, and with it let to a firewall which moved a lot of data on a pair of 4x NICs pushing and 8x1G using PERL to build a complex B+tree if IP tests changing to minimize the number of tests and keep the packets to a small test testing. New things came to dozens to one solution on a common ATOM getting bigger in the CPU at holding the same cost.
I can do so much more with just a slightly more CPU power, is this it, or is it (I bet) going for a low-cost game when I only need 4K screen at 120Hz and all it needs is icons and text (big enough to see).
What is AMD looking to do, the mini I buy a dozen at the time, or what changes all the time? The idea of running to 2030 is great, at a price of <$200 to justify the large solution.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
