paid denialism
Nobody, or no team of nobodies, would be this persistently annoyingly stupid without being paid.
Who are the paymasters?
Oil?
Russia?
Aliens?
Rapture Xians?
Or is it a conspiracy of all of the above?
334 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Oct 2020
The prediction is that the asteroid will cross the earth's orbit at a quite accurately known time, but a less accurately known location. So there is some geometric figure which is at risk, which includes the cross-sections* of the earth and the moon.
As the accuracy improves, the figure gets smaller.
But the Earth doesn't.
So the probability that the asteroid passes through the part of that figure occupied at that moment by the Earth ... increases.
At some time the figure contracts to not include the Earth, and the risk declines to zeroish, or alternatively the figure contracts to not include anything but the Earth, and the risk rises sharply to unity. Binary, what.
Whether we can refine it to 0||1 before it provides the worked example I do not know. Probably someone does.
* Solid, plus atmosphere, plus gravitational effects.
The Tsar bomb was said to be 100MT but among the problems that presented was that nobody believed an aircraft could drop it and survive the detonation. So it was adjusted.
A megaton delivered as 10 warheads rather than one was thought to be harder to intercept, and more damaging, and was said to be a targeting mode for MIRVed missiles.
The Challenger, I recall being told, has 30 seconds braking. I inferred that if it then let the brakes cool it would have 30s again, until it needed it's brake pads replaced.
Why do you think a tank wouldn't have electrical braking?
Plausibly worth having just for going downhill, but the bonuses of providing power for the boiling vessel and being alternately a motor along the lines of the Formula 1 car might be appreciated.
I don't know what the clutch life on tanks is, I suppose there's a torque converter, but you might even find a fully electric transmission is useful, as on trains, heavier and faster vehicles running on tracks that they are.
Get clever enough, and you run a combustion unit at its most efficient speed to generate power, making it smaller and quieter.
It isn't clear to me that the library needs to be on the same network as the patient records.
Even if it is being used on the same desk.
(Indeed, working on two screens is probably more effective than one, particularly if the clinical record is designed to use all the screen.)
But ... when the spacecraft manoeuvres, why do you think it takes its cloud with it?
You'd have both dodge, so as to avoid each others clouds.
I will say that's the first time I'd heard that theory, and traces of atmosphere, minute differences in orbit, radiation pressure, and possibly earth and solar magnetic fields might be reasons why.
A bit like minor surgery = surgery on someone else.
A consequence of Open Source is that if someone wants to add a function, one they want to use, then they cannot be prevented from doing the necessary work to produce it.
I see that as benign.
(It doesn't ensure anyone is capable of the work, or that anyone else incorporates it)
I know more history than that.
I'm not so old as to remember the Great Game.
Russia's rulers do not want adjacent countries doing better and having fun, it sets expectations domestically.
Nor, I think, do they want a large reservoir of people able to accomplish the next revolution. The cull continues.
And one found it, and mentioned it.
Whether any found it and stayed quiet, banked it, we don't know. If so, they've been frustrated, also.
Theres a paradox about finding such a fault, attack, crime etc.
Once found and announced, it has been found. It can't be found for the first time again, snd yet we are told that being found only by one person shows a system isn't working.
to tell people the door is not for casual opening, usually.
If there is no lock, it is hard to reprimand someone for opening the door.
If there is a lock (or other alleged security mechanism) then it is clear to anyone without the key that they need a reason. As indeed he had.
There's where his manager was the inverse of adequate
I see above nobody will buy EVs because they are expensive, and i see above that 2nd hand EVs are going to have lost much or all or too much of their value.
Should you talk about that amongst yourselves?
Meanwhile in the last year I have seen one new petrol station in 6000 miles, can think of three that have closed within 50 miles of here, and see charge places popping up like a rash.
You'll be able to make a living selling petroleum, for a while.
After rather a lot of posts telling us the battery doesn't hold enough energy and is heavy, so low energy density, we have one telling us that if it held more in smaller volume it would be dangerous.
C4/P4/TNT no, but something approaching the density and total energy of 20 - 40 litres of Diesel/Kerosene/RP1 would match or surpass the capacity of standard uk cars (which are mostly not topped up nightly)
20 litres because more than half of a petrol tank is turned into heat - a wastage if you are driving it, and a hazard if containment fails. 40 litres because it takes longer to fill up.