Re: Where's Lewis Page?
Which mission do you feel they need more aircraft for?
554 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Oct 2020
in remarking that that prefatory remark, a solution to the Thoats of Barsoom problem (call them horses) will cause trouble with people who ignore it's context - it is in a work of fiction, not outside it.
I suspect asides to the reader will increasingly be accused of being prompts to Eustace or whatever a future gadget is called.
Better to start taxation at 40% on any income over, say, £1000 and raise the minimum pay and benefits amounts so that 60% is a liveable income.
And put the costs of licencing and regulation largely and mostly through the Treasury, so the people who allegedly benefit from regulation exert control on what is spent on it.
People nowadays expect to have a phone/terminal wherever they go.
And when they come back they likely need it to get their transport or accomodation.
So they could use the company phone for personal stuff.
Or they could carry their personal phone, which is most of the security hole before they even use it.
If they have both, they'll get mixed up, that looks like a creditably low percentage of times.
In rooms.
The most effective surgeons I knew managed their own diaries, kept them on their outpatient desk, agreed and wrote down a date with the patient when a decision was made.
And then there is emergency work. Make enough slots for that, it runs smoothly.
There are clever things - but not _very_ clever - that can be done with computers to help that go smoother, faster. We did one of them with cumulative lab results, in 1975, on the mainframe. With the hard drive that was craned into the building. It hadn't spread everywhere by 1990.
seem to be out of scope here, although can their owners, providers, users, or targets actually apply that Utah law?
Surely it is far simpler for the Utahns, who after all control their government and thus only have legislation against things they don't want to do, to just make it illegal to access porn using a VPN?
Globe.
I arrived at LAX from Brisbane, with a stopover with relatives by marriage, and the relevant wife, and was told that Brisbane LAX Heathrow wasn't approximately a great circle route, hence dropping in.
It's a long flight, at most I raised an eyebrow.
Now I wonder if he was a flat earther, then I just thought there must be recruiting standards.
"waitresses on minimum wage are getting fired for calling a bloke in a skirt "sir" don't you?"
I don't know that.
If you do, where?
Most blokes in skirts I've seen were drunk Rugby players, and calling them Miss doesn't seem notably better.
BTW do you have a suggestion for a salutation to people whose gender is not obvious to you? Or perhaps gender always is "obvious" to you?
is constructive.
IANAL but he should be dismissed, at least from the team, and for a reason nobody seems to have picked up, and probably from the company.
That's dismissal.
Might be peremptory, decisive, immediate, measured after review, or whatever, but it is dismissal.
OTOH keeping him on, putting him in a less interesting important job - with less scope for fucking up anything significant - downsizing his desk; chairs; shoes - pointing st him and warning newcomers to beware - if he left saying that had made work life intolerable, that's constructive dismissal.
What hasn't been said?
Team leader: Lydia.
Errant subordinate: male.
He can't be trusted to work for anyone without a Y chromosome. That rules out most decent companies.
A colleague once wanted to buy an X-ray department (having been asked to set up a health service) and rang a supplier in England to enquire. They indicated they could arrange to discuss requirements in a week or two.
He rang an American supplier, "my VP is on the way to the airport".
Enthusiasm can be overdone, but also underdone.
Nice place, I gather, never been there.
as non-core disappoints me.
(Providing work and currency to people who on average working the area is very core for a local administration, apart from the more obvious aspect.)
I could even argue that Personnel is necessary to look after the personnel who do everything else.