Re: Scatter Labs
Just be thankful they didn't call themselves Scatter Logical.
2050 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Oct 2020
All of whom will be focused on fulfilling their contractual obligations to the letter, rather than the good of the whole project, and who will inevitably start blaming each other for problems, delays and shortcomings when their work has to be integrated, giving the effort that familiar "cats fighting in a bag" feel that any effort that gets outsourced to multiple suppliers has......
Yep, that's gonna be really agile, if you define "unbearably stressful and ineffective" as agile.
Guess the Apollo moon missions were a piece of cake when compared with this appointment booking application.
And good news for British readers, from the linked Microsoft promo page :
"Most recently, The National Covid Vaccination Registration Platform for the 45 million eligible citizens in the U.K. is built via an Azure web form and hosted on Azure. As part of the overall service, System C, hosted and managed the National Immunisation Management System (NIMS) on Azure, also integrating with Primary Care and National Health Systems (NHS) nationally, using Power BI for reporting."
This stems purely from an attitude of overestimating their competence and declaring that if it works in a test in their labs it'll work everywhere.
They just won't admit that they need an easy to use cumulative patch manager built in to the OS, which does more than simply download gigabytes of stuff and spew it into the filesystem. This needs, above all else a rollback function that enables users to look at installed patches, and roll them back with a button click on the regular occasions that updates break vital stuff. Of course this would also require their patches to be limited to actual changes in order not to chew up vast amounts of storage keeping the old stuff available before it gets overwritten.
But even if they did this, it wouldn't take too long before they discovered loads of problems in the patch manager and had to patch that, breaking it too, so really it's just a hopeless situation..............
The clue is in the name folks. It ain't called AnonymousPrivacy.
When Microsoft bought it did you think they paid all that money because they wanted to provide a fun free service? Or because they wanted to leverage the user base to wring every last penny they could out of it?
However, I had no idea that they'd "link in" their Azure customers with it, or their "partners". I thought Azure was supposed to be a private customer-supplier professional grade cloud hosting operation. Obviously not. Just another privacy free marketing operation.
to hilarious.
I'm on the side of restart after patching myself. The idea that someone could reorder a struct full of pointers somewhere, and have a function resume that uses it without being aware of the fact is too nasty to contemplate.
Surely the solution is for the newspapers to set up their own search engines, which just forward the searches to Google, then strip out all the adverts in the results and replace them with THEIR own adverts. Hell, they could do the same with Google News, although that might cause an infinite loop of advert mangling.
I'm not talking about the worry of not having a power outlet available, or of a screen getting broken, or even of it getting nicked.
No, it's the terror of seeing someone breezing into the office and unfolding their new nine screen laptop.
Some of us consider getting corporate donations out of politics rather important to preserving democracy, believing that citizens who vote at the ballot box should influence policy, rather than companies who pile money into the donor trough.
No, it's a wussy, interminably slow version of the only properly exciting oval ball game, Rugby League.
No body armour required, fast moving play without big pauses, skill and guile rather than just brute force, it is magnificent, although its switch to Summer games really spoiled it for us fans of the old 80 minute mudfights in hail-lashed Pennine milltowns.
You don't need to verify the identity of the person who did the change when you can look at exactly what was changed. Especially when you're a company that knows so much about everyone anyway, and would probably start flagging up contributions if that person failed one of your secret checks linked to your own database for any reason, however minor.
If you don't trust the code, you're free to review it (and if the project has many contributors, you know lots of eyes already have).
If you don't trust the build, build it yourself.
Problem solved. Exactly how it was intended to be.
It seems that .lol is the most valuable How many organisations are going to have to purchase this domain to prevent massively inappropriate cybersquatting?
funeraldirectors.lol
victimsupport.lol
yourbusinessdomainhere.lol
This is ridiculous. What'll be next? .omg? .jfc? .fu?
The only things that IBM have had going in their favour for the past couple of decades are the quality of their unique technologies and the expertise and professionalism of their staff. For the very high end business stuff, they were still a reliable option, but were always a premium one. This came with superb documentation and access to advice that made it a proper added value proposition.
By ruthlessly booting out decades of experience and knowledge and replacing it with el cheapo newbies, just to save money on the balance sheets, they are announcing to the world that they are now a purely bean counter led company, who know the price of everything and the value of nothing. So, in the end the world will ask what the point of them is, and look elsewhere for cheaper alternatives themselves, hastening their decline.
If Mr Fone is outraged to discover that the government website links to a document that must be printed out, filled in manually and processed in an office somewhere, he will be delighted to discover this government site that contains lots of them for customs import and export declarations
After all, the TPA is pro-Brexit and I am sure that they therefore must be happy for taxpayers to shoulder the cost of the 200 million extra declarations each year that will have to be processed as a result.
The absolute nerve of saying this : implying that he needs to keep having the cash shovelled in his own personal direction otherwise the NHS staff who have worked so hard and with such dedication during the pandemic might suffer.
Cynically trying to hitch a ride on the back of their efforts in order to help his own cause is an utter disgrace.
Indeed, my bad for getting befuddled there.
But it's still a horrid language to code in in my opinion, and I think the decision to ignore any existing frameworks illustrates either Not Invented Here syndrome, or the fact that nothing exists yet that was considered up to scratch for that language.
It's been highly popular since I started work in the industry 25 years ago.
"the practice of deliberately injecting faults into a service to test its resilience" would be nice if any fault free systems existed. But releasing buggy software in order to get to market quicker despite the known bugs is enough deliberately injecting faults for most software development teams to cope with in the first place.
appears to be the playbook here. Why should anybody, as a user of the web, have to concern themselves whatsoever with befuddling stuff about Federated Learning of Cohorts and First Locally-Executed Decision over Groups just so that they can browse as desired without Google wrapping their slimy tentacles around every single thing they do when online?
It's become an arms race, where attempts to legislate against their gluttonous hunger for every morsel of user-connectable information are being met with ever more deliberately complicated and confusing counterproposals in the hope that if no-one understands the whole thing anymore, it will create lots of scope to sneak loopholes into the regulatory net that will let them carry on regardless.
Instead of all this complicated jargony obfuscation, force them to understand the concept of You're Not Allowed To Intrude On My Privacy In Order To Sell Advertising And Fling It At Me.
Chrome = Continue heaping rubbish over my eyeballs. I just hate how so many people have fallen for its' supposed superiority, when it's a complete user surveillance tool.
Watching the idiots in charge make terrible decisions that lead to huge security disasters? And only learning the huge real costs of attempting to cut costs by doing things on the cheap after the disaster?
This is a real life, industry standard lesson that will have taught the kids more about what not to do when it comes to cybersecurity in their futures than any multimedia app plaything. It's just that they're being taught what not to do by what they've just had happen to them. And that's the only way most of the grownups ever learn anyway.
That's funny - I was under the impression that their logistics had hardly been affected by the pandemic, and that they've been absolutely raking it in as people stay at home and spend more of their money at Amazon because the shops are closed and they want to buy stuff. This has a massive feel of "please prioritise us so we can make even more money and here's a thin excuse why we should get it first" about it. And also possibly a bit of "if you don't give it to us first, we won't help".
It hasn't occurred to them to magnanimously offer this help until the moment a new president is sworn in, presumably because of a beef between the boss and the last guy who occupied the White House. Hopefully the incoming changes don't include a newfound urge to start doing favours for, and shovelling even more money at Jeff "I really haven't got enough yet because I haven't got it all yet" Bezos.
So some ill-defined idea of AI is going to be adding 200 billion pounds a year to GDP in 9 years time in Britain?
That is the same as the second largest sector right now (supermarkets) and double the contribution from banking (fourth).
This is just an inane claim conjured out of nothing by fools who still believe in the rubbish that Dominic "I've just learnt to program in Python so I'm now the country's foremost IT expert" Cummings was spouting.
Yes, let's keep our heads down for a bit until the storm has passed, then we can quietly get back to making tons of money from the looney tunes goons.
I suspect that this won't be enough to stem the consequences resulting from what just happened once the new administration takes office, but you can be pretty certain that the lobbying effort will already be underway to fight back against any changes that will be proposed in the way these giant companies currently operate.
Still, the realisation may finally be dawning that if you let people play with fire in your house, you might end up getting burnt.
Think about that : these are mostly the more senior management type employees, plus the minions that serve them. If more senior staff can't afford housing then the problem has really got out of hand. No doubt the housing will come complete with Amazon autonomous vehicle delivery services and "free" Amazon Prime services, Amazon supermarkets and street corner Alexas.
In the warehouses, it will be easier to build "sleep pods" for the unfortunates that end up having to "live" there. And if you spend more than seven minutes in the toilet in an hour, you won't just lose your job. You'll lose your home.
are like types of customers. Thin clients, thick clients, fat clients, those who think the server should do everything for them and those who think the client should control everything................ you'll meet them all eventually if you stay in the industry long enough.
I suspect the operator of at least one of the app stores has already looked at all these contact tracing apps, and seen them as an important part of their future business model. Or thought that they were a bit amateurish compared to their own tracking and snooping capabilities, but best not mention that too loudly, eh?
In the authoritarian states you'll be restricted to the governet, where the big government dictate arbitrary rules and spy on everything you do.
In the world of freedom, you'll be free to use the internet, where the big corporations dictate arbitrary rules and spy on everything you do. And the big corporations finance the politicians in government that keep it that way.
At least in a company of more than 2 employees, following this will get you to a level of market-competitive efficiency as nowhere else will be much better.
However if you want to actually sabotage things, there's one guaranteed way to do it. Introduce new systems and procedures as part of an "efficiency drive". Nothing succeeds better in reducing efficiency in a big company than a conscious top-down attempt to improve it.
According to a short documentary film on the subject I saw several times in the 1980s, the best way to produce extended life batteries is to charge them up by getting lots of little rabbits to play drums and extract the energy generated. If there could be some way to minituarise the rabbits, and provide them with sufficient carrots and lettuce to give them the energy they need to drum a little more quickly, then future power requirements might well be met this way. You do have to be careful though, as the rabbits can get a bit tired and fall over.
Let's face it, what has actually fundamentally changed between the problem described in this story and every story of cloud bork reported every day this past year? Still the same issue : computer unavailable via network. Whether that computer is an ancient 386 in Ken's office or on a rack in an Azure datacentre is irrelevant when you find that remote access to your files has ceased. Although those of us who actually had to endure the horrors of Windows for Workgroups and Netware back in the mists of time probably appreciate it better than the modern folk who take it as read that everything automatically connects to networks and starts working instantly. Most of the time.
I'm not surprised Cook refused to meet after this offer. He may as well have phoned up and said "Hi Tim, the company's in seriously deep shit, and I'm looking for some mug to get some money out of before it collapses". OK, the company got through this and subsequently succeeded, but nobody knew that was going to happen at the time.