Re: What about non 4G?
If they’re using 4G, God knows how they’ll cope in deepest Essex, EE has more dead spots than coverage once out of the towns.
41 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Oct 2020
I pretty much use Firefox for everything. The only exception is Google Ad shite for which I use Chrome. I've found Firefox clean and quick, OK it needs some tweaking to get it running as you want but it is independent and not based on Chrome. Got FF on Linux, iOS, MacOs and the MS shizz. I just wish Edge would uncouple from Windows, that's an aggravating browser. FireFox has a wonder Facebook fence plugin, stops Meta tracking your stuff. It's worth it just for that!
I have the great fortune of living in the Canary Irelands.
Amazon.es, our "local" Amazon are the absolute pits, they ship hardly anything to the Canaries and it they do, it'll take weeks to get here. Since Brexit, Amazon UK is a no-no. The local customs will sit on UK parcels for months, I still have a Christmas present stuck in Las Palmas customs. In real terms, that just leaves Amazon.de which is marginally better than the others. They will still take an order, sit on it for a month and only ship it when you threaten to cancel. I am convinced they sell stuff they've not got in stock, they definitely send returns out as new and they also charge tax when they shouldn't.
They are also turning into a tech Temu/Alibaba, look for any hook-up gear, adaptors, converters, or power supplies and it's all the same crap slightly repackaged which is available from China at half the cost (and this stuff doesn't get held in customs).
Decent product sold by companies is usually marked up over and above the price sold on the supplier's website which makes it much more expensive but the Amazon addicts still buy it. (I know it is up-priced as my daughter uses Amazon and eBay as sales channels, mainly because it's cheaper than paying Google PMAX charges).
There is a move away from Amazon by the better quality suppliers, not so many years ago almost anything was available, if it carries on like it is it will be an outlet just for Chinese tat.
Oh, and they treat their suppliers really badly.
Musk is making a perfectly reasonable point here, Microsoft should not make it appear that an account with them is a requirement to run Windows, because this is how it looks.
Pretty much everyone who reads the Register will know how to circumvent this but the average user won't and will sheepishly follow Microsoft's setup instructions. The gathering of personal data is one of Micro$ofts prime business drivers. Knowledge is power.
Speaking to people I know who have/are worked on government projects is that they generally start well and make significant progress until someone up top decides it is vital that an overview is conducted by external consultants, one of the usuals -Deloitte’s, Crapita et al. At this point the project is doomed to a long and lingering death. The consultants hidden agenda is to find areas of concern, usually false, where they can slip in a junior consultant to do some consulting which in turn, brings in more of their chums. It’s like a corporate cancer. And it’s not often that the consultants pick up any of the blame, they only cart off millions in fees leaving the project dead in the water. And no one ever points to the elephant in the room. It stinks.
I’m living in a village in Spain, we have full fibre and 300Mb synchronous. It is genuinely very fast, very reliable and costs, Inc phone less than 30 quid a month. The UK could do this but the will is not there, it’s all about the large conurbations and making piles of dosh. Forget the small communities, let them eat 3G and suffer 1 up and 5 down.
What they do not mention is the quality or speed of the broadband received for the money. I suspect they're comparing apples with peanuts.
Here in the Canaries, you can get 100/30mb fibre from a 3rd party supplier for €15/mnth but testing results reveal less than impressive performance. However, if rented from Movistar (Telefonica owned national carrier) for 33€ a month you can get a 300Mb sym FTTD that tests over the advertised rate. For another 20€ you csn bolt on a mobile and TV.
What would have been more indicative would be a price per Mb/month.
Just taken this for a test drive. All of the above is true, password in the clear for failed pw creation, password requires special characters which is OK providing the special character is a ?.
The interface and logic is straight out of 2001, the least intuitive system, most user unfriendly thing I've seen in many a year.
Google Ads is vital if you sell to consumers online, there is no other game in town, Bing pick up the crumbs and the other routes to market are eye wateringly expensive. Our online ad costs have risen over the last 20 years from a reasonable level of 2-3% of cost of sales up to a painful 15-20%. Google manipulate the ad market, they are a monopoly in all but name and they are abusing their position.
Keeping on top of the SEO changes, controlling advert allocation and audience is a full time job, goal posts are changed regularly and often removed altogether. They constantly change the rules and oddly enough, their customer improvements and efficiency changes always involve spending more money, usually with the caveat “you may see a temporary increase in xxxx while changes take effect” but the increases somehow become permanent.
Google are evil.
I´ve an MGB with zero electronics but loads of electrics, an ancient Jaguar ditto, a 94 XJS with a modicum of simple i/c´s, an early S Type which has some but still too many and a modern car, a Seat Ateca which is loaded to the gunnels with pointless stuff that I never use, it's got a screen like Android on steroids, I can change all sorts of stuff, use cameras and motion sensors and it's all pretty much unused and is at worst a huge distraction when driving.
I much prefer the classics to drive, no bleeps sirens and bongs, they´re just fast, comfortable, affordable vehicles that due to their age are now very green.
Modern motors are ridiculous.
My ex employer used to list certain products on Amazon, usually stuff that wasn't already listed. Sometimes they sold well, sometimes not so much. Those that sold well didn't sell well for too long as Amazon had picked up the product for themselves are were selling direct, cheaper of course.
ASDA used to do this to small shops, back in the day we extended our services from business comms and networks in to PC's and servers, opening a retail shop for the locals. A few weeks after opening, ASDA started selling low end Compaq´s for silly money, no support etc, etc... so our little shop, selling decent hardware with support lost most of its home business. After trying for a few months, abandoned Home stuff and concentrated on business sales. A few months after that, ASDA stopped selling PC´s there.
We were not the only retailer they tried to knock off, they did the same to a key cutter, a bike shop, a toy shop, pet sales, greetings card sales and a few others - as soon as they opened, ASDA went after their business and often the businesses closed. Not sure of the logic to this business model, perhaps it a "Oh, that looks like a good idea, lets sell that ..." rather than a dog-in-the-manger mindset. These small shops drew people to the town. Needless to say ASDA now reigns supreme over a town centre with boarded up premises, charity shops and estate agents.
As is normal with every supply problem, prices rise and suppliers take advantage of this, doesn’t make it right, it’s a fact of life.
The one that surprised me was Google. Our company sells dust masks, goggles and other safety stuff, not medical but some pretty high spec stuff. This is not the main line of business but a bolt on to complement the some the hazardous stuff sold. We’ve seen shipping this for at least 20 years. As soon as the profiteering hit, Google dumped this part of our shopping feed and our mask products stooped showing on search results. According to Google, this was because we were profiteering from a crisis. And no, we hadn’t e praised prices.
I wonder how many other companies experienced this.
This is one kitchen sink that'll get blocked. One of two things will happen, or maybe both; the council will find that the KPMG suddenly find they need more consultants to plug legal shortcomings "they have found" or the contract they signed is not the one they thought they signed and there will be extras, lots and lots of extras. Either way, they will be stuffed.
If it was VAT our club owner could have reclaimed it in the normal manner, he just has to pay it up front first. This sounds like a) UPS abusing the current situation and b) Seagate screwing up the export documentation. At a push, UPS could be charging import duty under the heading of Government Charges but that seems excessive, it's also way too low for a VAT charge.
If it's a no cost exchange, there should be zero charges. UPS are greedy. Seagate need education in export documentation.
No, your're not being silly. It's what many users want. I'd be happy with Wordstar, dBase II and Supercalc, the memory limitations would be a problem though. I still use photo imaging software for web stuff thats 25 years old, U-Lead Photoimpact because it's very quick, everything can be done with keystrokes and it's great at creating lightweight decent resolution graphics.
Have you ever loaded an old Netscape browser? Jeez they are fast, dangerously insecure but quick.
Anyone got a copy of Sidekick?
I really cannot see the point of porting Libre Office to a browser, increased security risk, more memory required and the necessity of being online to use it all make it a bit of a waste of time. And MS and Google have this stuff well covered already. They'd be better off using the reaources for rewriting the especially crappy bloated bits. No thanks, I still have a copy of Office 97.
Couple ousf points re FB
1. Their ads provide a dreadful ROI, no idea why people use them.
2. If you must use it, and there are some interesting groups available, use a burner email and make all your personal data ridiculously inaccurate.
3. Use a tight browser, FB hates Duckduckgo, Firefox do a decent job of blocking social trackers.
And then there is Google - far more insidious than FB.
This all harks back to the days of "Nobody got sacked for buying IBM". The public sector appear to find IT a problem and like all problems they want it gone. The problems start when they get to the contracts, get out clauses? They're in there but camoflaged to make it look like the customer is being protected. What they really need is decent, well staffed IT departments ahow are capable of managing and allocating jobs that are beyond their capablilities to smaller local companies. They should be trusted enough to manage their own budgets and report to the top bods exec, not the bean counters. Employing the likes of Crapita (and PWC, EW et al) means signing up to a bait and switch service, more often than not, the changes are outside the scope of the agreement etc... IT is much easier than it was 20 years back.
I date from the time of crossply tyres, rear wheel drive, low HP engines and no seat belts in Austin A30's and Morris Minors. This combination teaches car control, how to get around a corner quickly and safely when you shouldn't be able to and above all, how to be a good driver, a driver who becomes part of the car rather than a computer operator passengering with a steering wheel where every mistake is auto corrected and crashes are much safer. Modern cars (post 1990) are pretty boring. In my yoof, the majority of crashes seemed to involve alcohol or were as a result of poor road design and lighting. Driving was so much more enjoyable in the sixties and seventies.