Manufacturing fake research?
It's quite interesting. First up, I am British and voted remained. Center group type of person. I don't like leftists or the right. I sympathise with a small number of arguments of each.
To this law suit...
I had not thought that if I go a setup a new account, and start to follow people who are politically distasteful, knowing the free account is supported by advertising. Then just waiting or worse searching for highly controversial posts and photographing corporate advertisements alongside.
Then to publish this as research to put of other advertisers and damage the business model of the platform in a specific and targeted way.
I have been a Twitter users for many years. It's always been littered with trolls and extremists from the left and right. I would say it was more heavily loaded with hard left and was over the top on the rainbow hair people that seemed to be oblivious to the damage being done to children pushed to identify as the opposite sex rather than perhaps they were just gay. Thankfully, it feels like a lot of them have left Twitter/X and they have since been found out with the Cass review. They all seem to have moved to Reddit which was pretty much anything goes, but now it's been taken over by the rainbow hair people...words are violence types. How little they know.
Anyway, back to the whole law suit, this will be an interesting trial to watch progress, because now their tactics have been pointed out....faking research to damage a business they had a political agenda against the owner for. It would not suprise me that the same kind of tactics have been used for other nefarious purposes.