Re: Horses for courses
You are, number 6
25 publicly visible posts • joined 25 Aug 2020
Businesses like to make money. Hiring based on ability lets them make more money. Are there going to be abuses? Sure. They existed under the old rules. Being forced to choose candidates on any criteria other than ability is discrimination.
Universities being forced to favor applicants based on physical characteristics is discrimination.
The unspoken bigotry is the notion that some people are incapable of success without government intervention is evil.
I want to see how this plays out.
Until you need to share data, or a subset of the data with another person or application.
Perhaps you need to provide data that will be consumed later or asynchronously. Maybe you need to have it processed remotely at a later time.
Or maybe the data needs to be put into a hierarchy that requires several steps and other processes to achieve.
Files are containers that can persist beyond the life of our application or running process.
Having the ability to persist them at point we deem critical is better than having the OS guess…
Actually they require increased lift for takeoff, and the combination of lift and increased drag for the landing. On landing, this allows a steeper descent profile with control.
You are confusing how it is accomplished with what is required. (The same mistake users make when describing software requirements. They tend to present the solution instead of describing the actual problem)
If this system handles the requirements via a different mechanism, then you don’t need the flaps. We have no way of knowing this from the article.
Flaps increase lift, with the penalty of increased drag - especially at large flap deployments. The drag is useful in landing, not so much for takeoffs.
I suspect the types of missiles and the means of tracking them is far more complex than the old cold war era systems of ICBMS. Cruise missiles, medium range missiles, hypersonic missiles, stealth technologies, are all (relatively) new threats to deal with. I would guess the older sensors aren't up to the task, plus the need to integrate the information into the "battle net" in real time is a factor as well.
The modern battlefield is basically a giant mesh network of sensors and and weapons. The pace at which technology evolves will result in more and more frequent updates to satellites and ground based monitoring platforms.
Actually there are a number of uses:
including inspecting fence lines, runways, towers, tank farms (the kind that hold fluids, not the kind that run around on tracks), security - one or two soldiers could patrol a larger area than on foot, and probably quieter than in a Humvee. From an elevated position, you can see a far greater area.
There are locations with antennas on mountain tops - quick and cheaper way to get to them in a timely fashion. I can see the operating cost per hour being a lot cheaper than using a helicopter.
and that's just off the top of my head, limited in capacity though it may be.