Re: At a time when so much news is negative
Definitely 7 cylinders short of a V8.
684 publicly visible posts • joined 1 Jul 2020
There is a UK equivalent to US class actions (its got an odd name that I cannot remember), but it is a lot harder to get a case turned into one, and I suspect that Tesco won't qualify at the best of times.
To be clear, IANAL.
Not all of von Braun's rockets landed on London, just some of those developed from the A4 experimental series. Hos later designs missed London by a wide margin, which in the case of the Saturn-V was probably a very good thing!
(dammit - no rocket icon)
I once said a whole lot worse to a supportably experienced software engineer who tried to deliver some over-complicated and totally uncommented code that would only run without crashing on the very limited test cases they used to "prove that it conforms to specification". I was, however, restrained - I delivered my opinion in a private office with the door closed, and not in the open-plan office space in which I first saw the code submission.
The failure of the oxygen tank is a bit more complicated than was stated in the article. The tank had (as where all oxygen tanks) been subjected to a rigorous series of tests on the ground before being installed into the Service Module. However, the tests for this particular tank had not been performed correctly which meant that the tank's heaters had been subjected to a massive over-voltage during the tests. There was a certain amount of post-test arse covering, during which it was decided that since the heaters still *seemed* to work, they tank should be OK to be used. In fact, it is thought that the heaters had been damaged, leading to the in-flight failure. There was no way of checking the heaters using Mk 1 eyeballs since they were sealed inside the tank, and getting them out would have destroyed the tank.
This all came out during the post-mission investigations and two things happened: (1) the people concerned where given an official kicking, and (2) procedures where changed so that any "glitches" like that would result in the relevant component being scrapped, regardless of cost. An expensive way to learn a lesson, but it could have been a whole lot worse.
ESTEC (the European Space Technology & Research Centre - one of the ESA establishments) used to have environmental chamber for test satellites. During one test sequence the satellite would be heated to about +200C on one side, while being cooled to -150C on the other side - AT THE SAME TIME.
Apparently the chamber cost a bomb to construct, but earned its cost back many time over in robust satellite design/builds.
As someone who has worked in the space industry as an engineer and consultant for well over 3 decades, I have to say that this article pretty much hits the nail on the head. The sort of people who are needed in the space industry (intelligent, pragmatic, capable of looking at problems and coming up with simple, well engineered and workable solutions) are also precisely the the sort of people who are wanted in other industries, and sadly there are few who cam compete with banks and management consultancies in the salary game. I tend to find that the people who come into the space industry and stay in it tend to be motivated more by the engineering challenges than the salaries that they can command elsewhere.
I case to note: I was once offered a job in the banking industry that would have nearly tripled my salary, I turned it down because i knew it would not challenge me and i would be bored within 6 months.