Charging speed is like range
My car supposedly charges at 250 kW. I've never seen this speed, even at the latest, greatest charging sites.
12 publicly visible posts • joined 30 Jun 2020
Perhaps some of you people who know much more about this than me can explain this.
To train an AI model it has to take in vast amounts of data a lot of which will be untrue.
Therefore it must be able to differentiate between truth and lies (or facts and lies if you like) to come up with the correct answer.
If it can differentiate between the truth and lies (or falsehoods or whatever) why isn't it used to screen out the rubbish?
Then we wouldn't have to wade through some of the cr*p that's out there.
Just asking.
I took my Tesla on the ferry recently, After disembarking it took it 4 hours to realise it was in Spain rather than driving cross country in southern England and across the English channel. This was despite charging at a Spanish supercharger. Full self driving seems unlikely for a long, long time.
They are falling off a cliff mostly due to unease around what the ongoing maintenance costs are likely to be. Tesla needs to address this urgently as when the second hand market falls the lease deals will sky rocket due to lower residual values. This is already happening. Tesla needs to open up maintenance and service to third parties so the cars can be kept on the road at a reasonable cost.
My Model 3 is currently having its rear drive unit changed after 96k miles. I've had lots of other cars and none have had this level of fault at this (mainly motorway / highway) mileage. There is absolutely no maintenance done on the drive units so there is nothing you can do to prolong their life (I drive very conservatively).
Conk out before 100,000? I've done 75,000 in my EV. No noticeable battery degradation. They're too expensive and don't go far enough on a charge but battery degradation on newer EVs is no more an issue than an ICE engine deteriorating. Service costs so far for 75,000? Nothing. I'm sure that has an environmental footprint as well.
I tried a direct comparison between Tidal Hifi and Spotify using Sony Bluetooth headphones connected using LDAC. I played the same tracks and switched back and forth. Tidal Hifi certainly sounded a bit better with more space between instruments, more balanced, more detail etc but the difference wasn't big enough for me to move away from Spotify. I'll certainly give Spotfiy Hifi a go but don't expect a massive improvement.