Re: Expensive wordplay
The next 66 pages, however, are a delightful read. Serious claims about MI manipulation, poor access controls, IP infringement and attempts to shut the guy up :)
5 publicly visible posts • joined 29 Jun 2020
The first 18 pages claim Twitter lied by saying fewer than 5% of mDAU accounts are spam when Musk actually asked if more than 5% of all accounts are spam (the total spam figure is not measured). Remuneration and ad prices are based on mDAU...but it is potentially expensive wordplay.
APNIC performed a comparison of the main browsers with and without the main ad blockers in August 2020. Looks like I'll be switching from Ghostery to uBlock Origin. Full report at end of article.
https://blog.apnic.net/2020/08/04/characterizing-cname-cloaking-based-tracking/
Electronic money accounts are not covered by FCSC because this is supposed to be unecessary. FinTechs like PockIt, Curve and TransferWise are legally required to deposit your real money with a third party bank. The App then creates digital money pegged 1:1 and conversion takes place only during deposit or withdrawal from the App ecosystem. Thus your money is safe as long as the bank (not the FinTech) is safe.
However, in this case the bank was a subsidiary of Wirecard...