Re: Frogger
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5etwHVarNgI
292 publicly visible posts • joined 1 May 2020
Gartner thinks this moment is therefore an opportunity in which VMware users should contemplate [...] the alternative virtualization platforms that will make that possible.
If cost or worry about the uncertainty about what Broadcom is going to do is important to your organization, that moment was over 2 years ago.
The article's datapoint of "over 3,000" customer workloads moved to Graviton processors means they must have plenty more than that... and yet they still think they're saving money using AWS instead of owning their servers.
Serious question: Given that they chose to migrate away from their own hosting towards AWS a couple of years ago, is this now strictly about accounting and managing cash flow? I could see how a subscription-based service would prefer the pay-as-you-go option of Operational Expenses rather than the Capital Expenses of buying their own servers.
Cost is always a factor, if you're engineering for anyone making a product that has to be profitable. Apparently only engineers working with someone else's money (i.e., the government) have the luxury of not caring what something costs.
Engineering is not science: it is the art of reasoned guesswork, trying to solve a problem by using available resources. Money is just one of those resources.
Seems like a large part of the nastiness of IAM is that it's been tacked-onto and evolved over the last 20 years, all while trying to keep everything as backwards-compatible as possible.
Of course, if they ripped it all out and started over today, AWS would look like a different thing but one must admit the fact that it's still here, underpinning all the New Shiny on top of it at all is an amazing feat.
We have two computers in the office at home for web browsing, homework, etc.
The newer one (2 years old) upgraded itself to Windows 11 last year. The older one (6 years old) Windows Update tells me is not compatible with Windows 11 because the CPU is too old. The only thing it can offer to do is refer me to places where I can buy a new computer.
Of course, we know I could do a fresh install of Windows 11 bypassing the CPU check, but I've been too lazy to figure out how to jump through the hoops to do the update.
Tesla stock down 4% is not horrible. They've had worse days than that and it seems to recover fine.
Everyone thinks His Muskiness is a genius that an do no wrong, but it's a very real possibility that Tesla might do even better with someone else as CEO.
There were a lot of people who thought that Apple would implode once Steve Jobs was gone. One could argue that the "vision" has faltered without him, but you can't argue with the financials that Cook has delivered or the health of the company.
Yeah, they obviously should be building the airplanes right at the aluminum mine...
I would argue that with shipping as relatively cheap as it is, it makes more sense today than ever to have manufacturing spread across the country. It's not a big deal to book space on a train that's running between two cities anyway; there is so much more involved in running a business and a factory to be worried about, including workers' skillsets and housing, energy costs, etc...
Yes, it doesn't solve every problem, but I'm sure it would have its uses.
Maybe I don't need them RIGHT NOW, but if I could click a button as I squeezed the last bit of toothpaste on my brush in the morning and had a replacement on the porch when I got home, that would be great. (Isn't that what Amazon was trying to build with their Dash buttons?)
As for diapers... with an infant at home sometimes leaving the house is just not an option. Having diapers delivered within a couple of hours might be a godsend with a colicky or sleeping baby.
I can just picture these little robots, running down the side of an 80 km/h highway at 20kmh, bringing us soggy takeaway tacos and room-temperature milk...
I understand the principle of what you're saying: Musk's purchase of TSLA shares drives the price up; I get that much. But I don't see how the stock price going up 10% would give him a 10x return on his $1B.
And if he wanted to convert his holdings to cash, could the market absorb him selling $100 billion worth of shares, even over a few months?
My meager understanding of the stock market means I'll forever be a "buy index funds" kind of investor. I think I understand the same two rules that you do: 1. The game is rigged, and 2) the house always wins.
There's an analog to managers that I can relate to: I "manage" some tasks in my life by hiring others to do them for me. I am fully capable of replacing brakes or changing the oil in my car--sometimes I even do it. But I usually pay someone else to do it over lunch so that I can use my time for something else, which is how I buy back my Saturdays.
Having a small amount handiness with my car gives me the knowledge to know what jobs really are above my ken and best left to professionals. And I like to think a little knowledge allows me to judge if the professional knows what he's talking about or trying to shine me on.
It's not much different for managing business tasks. As I've told management here a few times: there is a reason I went to engineering school and not people school. I will manage/supervise if you want me to, but please don't expect me to be as competent at the task as I try to be at the technical side I've been practicing at for 30 years.
And usually in those instances, money somehow magically appears to solve the emergency...
Let me guess: the memory that was "too expensive" ahead of time was then purchased faster than you can say "priority shipping" and the field techs arrived to install it, thus averting disaster.
It's amazing how some managers seem to bumble their way from emergency to emergency, and somehow can tap dance around ever needing to explain why they seem to have so much experience solving crises...
Obligatory link: But you did not persuade me!
Anecdotally, I've found the younger people in the tech world really don't think it's a problem - and that worries me.
I've noticed this same laziness as the years go on...
1. There's no need to worry about how much memory is being used or cleaning up after yourself; the machine has lots to spare and the garbage collector will get around to it sometime, probably.
2. We now accept that a reboot is required every month/week/day anyway. Gotta keep those patches up to date!
3. Things just break, but it seems to be working fine now that I've rebooted. I have no idea why or interest in tracking down the root problem. The reboot erased all clues.
Just last week I had to urge a co-worker to tap the brakes... they were ready to go ahead and re-install the OS because a VM wasn't working, when the underlying issue was a Group Policy Object that was no longer applying. Turns out that's what happens when you move a computer out of the OU it was in... you know, like it warned you with that dialog box you clicked Ok on without reading.
It's like the schools have decided it's better to teach the framework du jour rather than instill a sense of curiosity, fundamental troubleshooting skills or scientific thought process.
But how may SCADA systems are assuming that time_t always increases, and will do bad things if = measurement/(time_t - prev_time) returns negative, or NaN ?
If that's the logic they're using, those systems will have already encountered this problem. Assuming time is always monotonic and increasing means that any clock adjustments backwards would cause the same issue.
These adjustments could be due to daylight savings or just normal adjustments from NTP, etc.
Does the US have internal, commercially viable sources of copper. And if so can they be brought on-line quickly?
Yes, we do. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_copper_mines_in_the_United_States
I live about 100 miles from the largest hole mankind has ever dug, in their quest for copper: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bingham_Canyon_Mine. It's pretty amazing to see.
However, for a company of the size of Atlassian you'd have thought they might want to own their infrastructure for the same reasons, just like StackOverflow did.
The irony would be too rich for Atlassian to swallow: moving their data from the cloud to on-prem, just after finishing screwingmigrating their customers from on-premise to cloud-hosted as the only option for the Confluence and Jira.
Yes, you've got me there. Bootcamp was a valuable thing for some users, but I still submit it is not a feature that a majority of users use or one that Apple touted as a selling point.
I'm not a Mac user, so forgive me if I'm wrong... the last Macs that use x86 were released in 2019, is that right?
When Broadcom first announced they were actively trying to drop less-profitable customers, I wondered how they could be so shortsighted. It's not like small customers (like me) cost them a lot; as long as my stuff keeps running and I have access to patches, I am happy.
Why would they be actively trying to push small customers into the arms of open source alternatives?
But now I wonder if they are playing a longer game than I realized. Maybe Broadcom realizes that as those alternatives get better, VMware's time inevitably is running out with the small and medium-sized customers, so it doesn't matter if they pay attention or not.
I think they are trying to be Oracle.
We recently had a similar Zoom call; the biggest difference was that the information was _presented_ to us; there was no chance for anyone besides the presenter to speak.
One of the main points that was given was that our customers need to be able to contact us... so apparently all our company-issued cell phones all work better while we're sitting in our offices?