Re: I would be willing to agree that ...
and ad hominems coming...
How predictable.
4298 publicly visible posts • joined 27 Apr 2020
Nobody is denying that climate is changing lol
People are questioning whether the actions that we take, that make certain people rich are going to have any meaningful effect.
The XKCD mentions short spikes are being smoothed out. The presented spike at the end, qualifies as a short spike that most likely in 1000 years time won't even be visible if our successors will use the same methodology.
Now make yourself feel better and buy some carbon credits. Flatten the curve!
It's a shame there is little information how people achieved the ice age last time. Clearly they didn't have electric horses nor means to tax the population to death.
On the other hand when we last time had a period of global warming, people didn't know what carbon is and didn't try to capture their cows' farts.
But I am sure clever propagandists will find a way how to fit all those scams into equation. Electric cars didn't make a difference? Oh well, we just didn't have enough of them! Closing all manufacturing didn't help? Oh well, we should probably have tried harder at depopulation!
Anyway, as it is always with those things, just make sure to make right contacts at gentleman's clubs and get on that green funding spree.
After all the rich are exempt from all this nonsense.
Or instead of investing in electrical grid you can:
- Ensure most people can't afford electric cars
- Ensure most people can't afford electric anything
- Ensure wage slaves don't have to roam too far - they have their supermarket, doctor, school, pub in 15 minute distance
- Ensure there is good internet, so that people spend most of the time consuming your propaganda
- Ensure people rent rather than buy, so they are dependent on big corporations and government
- Ensure to monitor all communication to nip any dissent in the bud
- Ensure social credit score is implemented to shape people behaviour
- Use any available manipulation techniques to ensure people can reframe living in open prison as peak of happiness.
is made more difficult by the lack of organic conversations which naturally arise or by the lack of immediate access to senior staff who can help new hires understand the intricacies of their jobs.
Can you explain? Usually the senior staff is just a few clicks away and you won't derail their train of thought by "immediate access" and "organic conversation", but rather have healthier asynchronous exchange where they can respond to you during the pocket where their brain runs idle.
Good company would have all information you need accessible online and a chat where you can ask anything you want, which is more effective than bothering people while they think about something.
The lesson here should be to have occasional periods when you all get together
Forcing people to meet, just for the sake of meeting or hmm "team building". I mean, it's daft too.
In healthier workplaces, these - once in a few months - get togethers are entirely optional.
It's fun for younger employees, but for older ones - sometimes that requires a lot of planning, energy, for something that ultimately is listening to other people mundane life stories and entertaining them with yours, while they make fools of themselves by getting too drunk or else. If you are older, you heard and seen all of it many times over and it's simply boring.
and I am yet to hear about a work meeting that cannot be done online (except when there are serious security concerns).
The grand return to the office. Who wouldn't leap at the chance to swap their cosy, coffee-scented mornings at home for the unmistakable musk of public transport at rush hour or the serenity of bumper-to-bumper traffic?
And the sanctified open-plan office! It's not just a productivity hub; it's a cultural melting pot where you learn essential life skills like typing while involuntarily eavesdropping, mastering the 7-minute microwave queue stand-off, and, of course, the diplomatic handling of Spoiled Tuna Sandwich-gate 2023.
Forget 'Zoom fatigue'; that's child's play - because who doesn't love a meeting that could've been an email, but live and with snacks?
In-office mentorship? Nothing says professional growth quite like unsolicited advice from Steve at the coffee machine, spouting wisdom that's as outdated as the 'casual Friday' memo.
Brainstorming sessions? A creative bonanza! There's just something about a fluorescent-lit room that really gets the innovative juices stagnating.
But the pièce de résistance, the true essence of office magic, is the unbridled joy of 'forced fun' - because nothing screams 'team building' like trust falls with Dave from accounting who, incidentally, also trusts deodorant is optional.
Yes, brace yourselves, dear workers, for the unparalleled euphoria of office life is upon us once again. May your coffees be strong, your bathroom queues short, and your headphone's noise-cancellation formidable. Welcome back!
The thing is, everyone has individual "clock".
If you find that you can naturally fall asleep at 3AM, you will never be happy in 9-5 (unless it is in another time zone).
There are some schools that claim you can shift it, by ensuring you wake up at the same time no matter what and you will gradually go to sleep earlier to get that 5-7 hours.
But it's a misery.
It's much better to talk to employer and ask for individual hours and accept you are 3AM person. No more snoozing and happier life.
It's hard to tell these days if these initiatives are being created to snap up funding that some governments give out in the name of "we need to do something", slack for a few years and then call it a day while keeping the mansions and yachts or there is genuine effort to compete with nVidia.
Imagine being a software developer earning typical UK engineering wage and then your employer comes up with:
Compass identifies relevant libraries and repositories used by a project and makes them available to developers so that if they’re working on related projects, they don’t have to hunt for the resources they’re expected to use.
Now you only need to hunt for reduced price food...
who can do the most convincing impression of a rocket scientist.
It is interesting how the rich are going for somewhat vanity projects, that sound big on the surface but if you look into the details, they seem pretty hollow.
Why trying to solve problems on Earth or at very least improve the lives isn't attractive?
Is space platform going to lift people out of poverty? Get clean water? Bring happiness to millions without roof over their head?
Or is it just another elaborate tax avoidance scheme? After all who is going to check if those super expensive, written off, items are actually in space and not just in the creative accountant imagination?
Space is definitely one place where IRS don't have its reach.
// uint8_t brakeFluidStatus = getBrakeFluidStatus(&car);
// if (brakeFluidStatus & BRAKE_FLUID_STATUS_LOW_FLAG) {
// setBrakeFluidLowLight(&car, true);
// }
// ^^ don't bother with the sensor
//
uint32_t timeSinceLastService = getTimeSinceLastService(&car);
if (timeSinceLastService > 94608000) {
// if it has not been serviced in 3 years, just nudge the user to visit one
setBrakeFluidLowLight(&car, true);
if (timeSinceLastService > 126227704) {
// ok this user is taking the piss. Let's set the engine warning light
setEngineFailureLight(&car, true);
}
}
Also never work beyond bare minimum. Just do enough so that management is unhappy about your performance, but it is not bad enough to fire you.
Company will never remember any all-nighters or that you missed your family time to deliver that essential feature on time.
The nano second you are a surplus to the requirement, you'll be let go.
$133,600 to $256,800, the company said, although San Francisco and New York are apparently special cases where the pay grade is $173,200 - $282,200 per year.
They should come to the UK, they could hire engineers for $33,600 to $56,800 and in London for $73,200 - $82,200.
They could go even lower, as engineers would happily work from their shoebox for a lower salary (to avoid bed bugs on public transport).
Our councils is *description of organic waste*
Question: how to make it look that we want to improve things, without actually doing anything?
Answer 1: we could send out some surveys and review our targets, so we could prioritise things that align more with the needs of residents
Answer 2: our system is slow, that's why we can't deliver anything. Maybe let's change the system?
Answer 3: good point! we will be able to slack off whilst the system is being upgraded!
Answer 4: and if it turns out to be a car crash we will be able to slack even more!
Answer 5: Everyone, let's sing hokey cokey!
Looks like CMA does not understand markets, competition and capitalism.
How smaller businesses can compete with Microsoft if CMA helps it to get even bigger?
What is the point of that institution then?
Just another gravy train, so the people working there can feel fake power and pretend they care while pocketing tax payer money?
Me thinks:
Most likely they won't find anyone and they will have a case for hiring a contractor from the usual suspects, paying market rate plus agency mark up.
Or they will find someone who will get paid supplement salary from one of our adversaries.
Either way this looks like a result of heavy lobbying (mhmm...) so that big and already established AI corporation can enjoy regulatory capture and have government do the work of keeping competition at bay.
The stench of corruption is overpowering.
The more dangerous drug the more in our interest for it to be legal.
For instance, people who use heroin die because of accidental overdose (you can't tell the strength of what dealer is selling as they don't have any quality control, labelling) or contaminants (e.g. dealer mixed Fentanyl poorly). It's more difficult to hold anyone responsible for "bad batch" and people have more difficulties to seek help, rarely from the drug use itself.