Re: Pointless
" if a rise in CO2 in the order of a fraction of a part per million can produce such dramatic effects as have been observed"
It can't, obviously. First: CO2 is *weak* greenhouse gas, even common and simple stuff like water vapour is 100* nore efficient. (IPCC tries to revert this right now, BTW:They do not like reality)
Second: There's >100* more water vapour in air than CO2, so the ratio in effectiveness is at least 1:10 000. IPCC doesn't say a word about water vapour: Can't tax it.
But now barely measurable changes in CO2 are causing percentage -level of changes to global average, according to IPCC. Fummy thing is that they've zero proof for it. Or formula. Ot eve actually correct climate model aftger 30 years of trying.
Where's the slowly vanishing ice age? Universal warming in 1995-2005 which didn't happen on Earth? Greenland and VIkings? (Don't exist in any IPCC material).
As a hard scientist (do 100 lab tests, analyze, repeat if results don't match) these guys are only world class thieves with zero actual science behind the claims. Most obvious is lack of formula: Temp versus CO2 concentration. A correct one I mean, with precitable results, every time.