Re: Corpo-ration
Like Louie Anderson said in Coming to America:
"In a year or two, I'll be assistant manager, and that's where the BIG BUCKS start rolling in!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CEnp84dgNfs
29 publicly visible posts • joined 12 Mar 2020
> Does anyone still recall the eye wateringly expensive CASE tools that were going to solve all your software engineering problems overnight
Like Rational Rose?
Whatever happened to that? I never encountered one application that ever shipped from it.
My experience (very experienced developer):
I use AI (in particular, a couple of LLMs, not coding agents) every day, but as an “AMA desk.”
It’s like having a really, really effective personal assistant nearby. I can ask for coding suggestions, documentation assistance, debugging help, etc.
I have to review any code that I get, VERY carefully. It tends to be fairly “naive,” and can often contain silly bugs (like hallucinated API calls).
But it’s like having a direct Stack Overflow feed, from about eight or nine years ago, when people rushed to answer any question, within seconds. The first answer was often not perfect, but might have the information I need.
The important thing, is that I can ask ANY question that I want, no matter how silly, and get an IMMEDIATE, highly relevant, answer. The fast response is the important part.
My experience is that, when discussing the privacy protections of my software, with non-techs, I get the standard “Oh, I don’t care what people know.” thing. Then, I detail, exactly what these data harvesting companies do with the data.
Suddenly, privacy becomes quite important.
In this case, the end-users don’t really have any idea. The ones going for the anglerfish lures are the app devs.
> Optionals (marked by ?) are discouraged in swift
Really? I use them all the time. The discouraged ones, in my experience, are implicitly unwound optionals (!).
It’s entirely possible for an experienced Swift programmer to write completely inscrutable code, but we’ve been able to do that in C for decades. In fact, I remember a yearly contest to generate the craziest one-line C program. Not sure if it’s still going on.
Really, when it all boils down to it, ASM is the most readable language, because each step is so primitive, that it can’t get too crazy.
I once made a Sir Terry reference “and Björn Stronginthearm’s your uncle.”
Totally relevant, and lightened up an otherwise dull thread.
It was edited out.
It doesn’t really bother me that much, as humor doesn’t translate well, but it was still disappointing.
I was raised by an English mother, and was exposed to posh culture for all my childhood.
No one can insult, quite the way the British can. One of my favorite TV shows is “The Prime Minister’s Questions,” on C-Span.
A good toff can rip you to shreds, without using a single obvious insult, and, quite often, by complimenting you.
There’s a very well-known text, called “The Insult File,” by Guy Macon (no I won’t link it, because it is often considered NSFW -Google it).
Ironically, it will pass most “troll filters,” because it uses archaic and rather convoluted language. Not a single cuss word in the whole thing.
I’ve asked almost twice as many questions as I’ve given answers, and, even before the new increase in question scoring, had a fairly respectable score; based almost entirely on my questions.
I believe that my questions are phrased quite well. In only a few instances, I have made errors, and have been careful to amend the thread with the correct information, and a note that I am leaving the question as a caution to others.
One of the real values of the site to me, is that I get “showstopper” problems solved very rapidly; often by realizing that I was going about it wrong. I really don’t mind realizing that I had made a mistake, neglected to read some document, or assumed incorrectly, as long as I get the right answer, in the aggregate.
In almost every instance, I could have figured out my problem, given time. Time is the one coefficient that I strive to reduce, and SO is a valuable tool in keeping that factor as low as possible. I’m very smart, and very experienced. Much more so than many of the folks there, but I am also constantly finding that I “don’t know it all,” and need to stay humble. Being condescended and patronized can be galling, but it’s a price that I’m willing to pay, in order to get the information that I need, in a timely manner.
But I’m fairly tough. I can deal with the criticism, and quickly learned to disengage, and let them “have the last word,” even if it seems to reflect badly on me.
I am very “results-driven,” and I get very good results from asking questions on SO.
Somewhere, there's a very famous answer in Meta that some high-score member made, in which he states that (paraphrasing) any question asked should be so thoroughly researched and presented, that it basically answers itself, and anything less should be discouraged.
I do find SO to be an extremely valuable resource, and sincerely wish them luck in cleaning things up, but they don't have a problem with lowbrow trolls, spewing rancor.
They have a problem with the "1%," treating everyone else like plebes, and no one will have the guts to address that. A 'bot sure won't be able to do anything about it.
To be fair, there are a lot of facepalm questions, but I seldom encounter them. They don't seem to come up in my searches for solutions. In my experience, they aren't much of a problem.