Posts by ThinkingMonkey

Arch Linux installer now slightly less masochistic

I guess I'm too late

I think I've missed the "I use Arch! HAHA!" train. I tried it out on bare metal years ago and man, I tried my best but my best wasn't good enough. I had read enough that I began to think I may be very close to being qualified to be a Linux kernel maintainer but still, no Arch.

Tried it again recently, found out about "archinstall", then nothing but pacman -Syu and pacman -S install [packagename], and now I'm like "It installed. It works great. Updates fine. Installs packages fine. But where's the challenge in that?' lol

Amazon bets another $4B on Anthropic

Re: But no raises for you peons!

Can you believe that I was well into my IT career (over a decade) before I realized that company owners/CEOs view paying employees as a negative, not a plus? Their "We're all in this together" speeches successfully brainwashed me, I guess. I'm not sure whether I was naive or just plain dumb (the latter, I'm betting).

I had noticed much earlier there was a phenomenon I called "Not knowing where their money comes from", where failed businesses had spent mega cash on everything except what actually produced the money, say a ditch-digging business spending all their money on everything except ditch-diggers and shovels. Finally I was with a company where the owner regularly stated in no uncertain terms that he knew for a fact that the company would be much better off if not for having to pay "all these technicians's salaries". (A 3-year-old can see how faulty that concept is)

Tech support world record? 8.5 seconds from seeing to fixing

Re: 8.5 seconds...

Almost that exact scenario. I could see under the desk that the light was not on. I asked him if he had checked the power strip. Annoyed, he said "Of course, yes." I crawled under there and turned it on then told him that in fact it WAS on but the plug was loose in the wall socket. I learned early on that however tempted you may be to point out how ignorant a user is, you never, ever want to do that. Or intentionally embarrass one. No matter how much of an a-hole they're being.

After 3 years, Windows 11 has more than half Windows 10's market share

Re: The Last OS

Anecdotal "evidence" admittedly, but if all the sites I've been seeing flooded with "Now what is this Linux thing again? How do I go about installing it anyway?" questions are an indication, it appears that many, many users have finally had it with Microsoft. I didn't see that much of an uptick in increased interest in Linux right after Windows 10 but for some reason (I don't know because I don't use it and will never use it) most of the users I'm talking about seem to be currently using Windows 11. Does it really suck as bad as people say? Actually sucks on its own merits or just "fails to be better" than Windows 10? I almost installed it in a VM one day just to find out then said "Nah". I may just be old and jaded but I really don't care to find out what it has to offer and what it doesn't. I guess as the great Phil Collins said, "I Don't Care Anymore." (about Microsoft products anyway)

Copilot's crudeness has left Microsoft chasing Google, again

Re: Prediction

Absolutely. After arguing that precise point recently on Reddit with what I later began to believe was a fanboy who believed Microsoft products were great because Microsoft said they were, I finally gave up. My points were mainly based on the fact that I had a pretty successful career fixing crappy Microsoft products. From my point of view, nobody will ever in a million years convince me that Microsoft products are anything but generally pretty crappy. OS, office suite, all of it.

"But...but..if they're so crappy, why are they industry standards?", he said. Are you kidding me? They're industry standards because the boss who makes those calls said "We're using Outlook for all our email needs" and that's that. Now the smaller companies that do business with them, to stay compliant, such as only receiving documents in Word format and nothing else, now it's a "standard."

Microsoft products are generally crap. There, I said it. I meant it, I have a ton of experience to back that opinion up, and I stand behind what I said. More to your point, their product life cycle appears to me to be "Look at our super new product! You have to have it!" Everybody buys it. Then they find out it doesn't work much better than the old version, maybe even worse, but Microsoft insists: "Maybe you're not doing it right. It really is a super product" they say. Finally the complaints mount until Microsoft can stand it no more. So they admit "Yeah, that did have its problems but guess what? We have a BETTER product now! You need it!" and the cycle repeats.

"...using ChatGPT++" And then "ChatGPT+++ 3.0", then "ChatGPT Extra", then "ChatGPT 2028" etc. 18,000 increments of the original whose current version is only marginally better than the original, maybe worse (as mentioned) with many features that users liked dropped from the product and features they hated "enhanced". Microsoft will tell you what you need, you don't tell them what you need. If you point out that you're the paying customer, I believe they internally pass that particular email around as an example of a hilarious notion.

Stock-trading apps fall under the feet of stampeding panicking investors

Re: Trolls out in force today.

I'm begging sincerely here. Can we please, please just discuss the topic at hand for once without Trump, either by name or by indecipherable acronyms, being mentioned? Trump sucks, yes. We all know that. Kamala sucks too, though. That's a dilemma we'll have to deal with in November. However I vote or don't vote, it definitely won't be a vote swayed by a Trump-hating or Harris-hating post I saw in a comment section somewhere so I'm not sure who you guys think you're convincing. Please, man, keep your politics to yourself.

Supreme Court won't stop Biden leaning on social media giants to tackle disinfo

Re: Dissent is not the same as lies

No matter what party is in office at the time, I just don't want "the government" deciding what's real information and what is not. I don't trust them as far as I can spit. I don't want Trump doing it, but I also don't want Biden doing it. Or any other temporarily-elected official. The government having things removed that they don't like just isn't my idea of us having anything near "free speech". All you in the comments saying that the government *should* remove things that aren't "verifiable and true", when is the last time you watched the news and saw anything at all that was "verifiable and true"? It's just another way of saying "We'll say anything we want, in the meantime you just keep quiet."

Google to push ahead with Chrome's ad-blocker extension overhaul in earnest

So you can toggle this, toggle that, OR you can simply use a browser other than Chrome. (My opinion may not be entirely unbiased, as I quit using Chrome because of various shenanigans quite some time ago.)

Snowflake denies miscreants melted its security to steal data from top customers

So security research shows it was highly likely it was Snowflake's fault, the crooks themselves say they got it from Snowflake, but Snowflake says "Hell naw, it wasn't!" It's dizzying. I'm not sure who to believe. The crooks could be lying of course, since they're mad Snowflake wouldn't pay up, but Snowflake has a whole lot of shekels to lose if it looks like they can't be trusted to secure data, so a denial is probably in order, true or not.

The truth shall be found in a future Register article, of that I have no doubt.

Twitter 'supersharers' of fake news tend to be older Republican women

Sorry they wasted all that research but it appears that they're pointing out that one group did a whole lot of misleading folks while folks from the other camp, whatever that may be, posted nothing. If these women misled 5% of voters and the opposition misled 5% of voters, it cancels out as if nobody misled, right?

Overly simplistic view of my point, of course but I believe that about sums it up. IIRC, one of ol' Elon's stated goals for purchasing Twitter was that its Democrat-oriented userbase was running amok with wild claims. Whether that's true, I have no idea. I wasn't there. So I discount this research not based on any political affiliation I may have but its failure to acknowledge that there was anything being posted to counter the claims these old bags were making, when of course we know they were. You can't say one word online without someone else saying how full of crap you are, so it certainly was happening at Twitter in 2020.

Since Democrats won the 2020 election it appears to make little sense to point out what unsavory shenanigans Republicans were up to back then unless that's not its point at all. Perhaps it's a "preemptive foreshadowing", as in "Hey, look what these clowns got up to last time. Need to keep a close eye on them here pretty soon."

Google sends Gemini AI back to engineering to adjust its White balance

Re: As someone on the tail end of their career....

Ditto. My niece's boyfriend is an "AI guy" (in what capacity I'm not positive. Some "founder", "co-founder", whatever) and he was expounding the greatness of their particular AI which is going to revolutionize the medical industry. "Do tell", I was thinking. He was on a roll so he did. It's going to read X-rays so doctors don't have to, diagnose all kinds of ailments by analyzing medical imaging, etc. Not wanting to start a quibble I just said "Sounds great" and I'm sure he labeled me a luddite.

Little does he know, I've been following AI development and failures for years (I'm an avid reader of The Register, after all!) and I knew for a fact that about 90% of what he was telling me they were "on the verge of" wasn't currently doable. It's been tried, tested, researched, and deemed a complete failure. Time and again. Maybe next year. So rinse and repeat. Same results, but maybe a .001% improvement so hey, that's at least in the right direction. Let's get more investors and keep going. After 8 years "Sorry investors, we spent all the money and it won't work. Our condolences for the loss of your millions"

So like you, my years have now promoted me to the guy who gets to laugh when laughter at shenanigans is called for. Added bonus: I don't even care who it offends.

"Can't please everyone"

I don't believe that that "You can't please everyone" platitude applies here. You seem to imply in the article that "Those gosh-darned companies are trying their best, but it's not easy" I'm sure it's not easy. If it's so hard that they can't accomplish it, however, maybe it's time to pick up a different hobby.

It's my opinion that their chief goal is not even trying to get the models to be ultra-accurate with either text-to-text or text-to-image, they're just trying to reduce the crap enough so that people will quit complaining so much about how crappy it is. Prompting a model to generate an image of "The American Founding Fathers standing in Times Square" and they're people of color, instead of their real race, doesn't make me a racist to not accept that nor is it a matter of "You can't please everyone". It's a complete, fallen-over-dead failure of the model. A complete and absolute failure, nothing else.

Say the generated image didn't contain wrong-colored people. Suppose you're trying to generate an abstract art piece with various colors but the colors it's generating aren't the colors you specified, or more to the point certain colors it should have known to use (suppose the prompt includes ...with a rainbow stripe from left to right...) and the "rainbow" is brown, white, black... colors that are definitely *not* in a rainbow. Would we now be saying "The model was made too safe." or rather "This thing is a piece of crap". I suggest the latter.

As it stands today, models are doing some amazing things. But they're also making just as many, if not more, spectacular failures.

Meta spends $181M to get out of lease at vacant London offices

Losing sleep

over the fact that the owners of premium office space used to gouging the life out of businesses for their office space now have empty, un-rentable real estate all over the place. I hope they recover soon and can get back to their $20 million per month rentals. I was the victim of that but at a smaller scale when my landlord used to ask me how my (IT-related) business was going. "Great!" I always said. Big mistake. In two years, he raised the rent 4 times. It was for a 2-year lease with "rent adjustments" every 6 months in the contract. Those adjustments were never in my favor, naturally. I finally moved and the place has been sitting empty ever since. Oddly, many people seem to have never heard of the "Kill not the goose that lays the golden egg" idiom.

Washington plans to block Chinese access to AI cloud services

Re: AI Involuntary training exploitation

Meanwhile, DARPA/CIA/NSA/5-Eyes are searching for ways to commit espionage to exfiltrate Chinese technology. It's all just a big, never-ending game.

JP Morgan accidentally deletes evidence in multi-million record retention screwup

Just a "good" business decision, perhaps?

Maybe there was a meeting where it was decided that paying $4 million in fines now was a much cheaper deal than tens of millions lost in lawsuits or even greater fines later?

Finally, ransomware victims are refusing to pay up

Novelty (not) of stolen data being exposed

I'd venture that since there's very little personal data about us that hasn't been exposed already, companies aren't as afraid of that as they once were. Thus, the refusal to pay a ransom is a decision that's much easier to make now.

What was once "Release all our customer's data on the dark web!!?? OH MY GOD! NO!!" is now "Go ahead. We'll pay a piddling fine to regulators and move on."

Direct lithium extraction technique for greener batteries gains traction

Ahh..that rarest of creatures: The Desert Farmer.

Rivals aren't convinced by Microsoft's one-click default browser change

Surely an easier way...

Not defending Microsoft in any way, just remarking on something that was mentioned in the article: Instead of drilling down and down through Settings to find file types and what programs open those file type extensions (which the next MS update will change back anyway), I've always found it vastly easier to make a fake text file on the Desktop with the desired file extension (say "test.html"), right-click on it, select Open With, Select Another App, select my desired app, and make sure there's a checkmark in "Always use this app...". Maybe I'm missing something but that's how I've always set default programs in Windows, in cases where more than one program is installed that can potentially open the same file type. (Notepad, Notepad++, Word, and LibreOffice Writer for .txt files, for example)

Yes, the point of the article was that non-techy users may not be very aware of how to change defaults using ANY method but I'd just like to throw my caveman-style method out there so anyone interested that hasn't done it that way may give it a try.

US distrust of Huawei linked in part to malicious software update in 2012

Re: Smellycat @Alpine_Hermit

Perhaps it was indeed a misunderstanding. But you did call them a "propaganda outfit" and that El Reg would "sully" themselves by using them as a source.

:...which the company denied..."

If someone has a copy of the code in the update, either the malicious code is there or it's not. I'm thinking it probably is or the claims being made wouldn't be made. So instead of "we deny that" maybe Huawei could instead say "We admit the malicious code is there, but we didn't put it there." Which could potentially be true. I mistrust U.S 3-letter agencies in the strongest terms. The formerly illustrious FBI has become one long-running joke and they are far from the worst.

Dutch nuclear authority bans anti-5G pendants that could hurt their owners via – you guessed it – radiation

Simple solution...

Buy an iPhone 12. Expensive, but what price health, I ask. I have one and it appears to ward off 5G signals very effectively. T-Mobile told me I should get 5G practically everywhere but I've only ever seen the tiny "5G" icon on the upper right of the screen like twice in the last 6 months despite traveling around quite a bit. So my body should be just about as "5G-free" as your basic caveman.

The Filth Filter is part of the chipset, honest. Goes between the TPM and SEP. No, really

A little nervous sometimes...

I don't remember the exact wording of the law but in my state you are absolutely required to report any "illegal" content found on a user's system. (I use "illegal" in quotes since I'm not a lawyer and "sketchy" and "illegal", while clear in most cases is not always so crystal clear). If it is later found by somebody else and reported and it's found out that it was in my shop, I'll be answering some very difficult questions.

Anyway, I was sweating bullets when a very nice grandfather-ly man I knew brought in one of his laptops to be fixed with some problem or another. When I started to back up his photos before re-installing the OS, I ran across about 100 explicit photos (time-stamped from about a week before) of a cute teen that I thought looked about 15. I recognized her as K***, his granddaughter.

After pacing the floor for about 30 minutes and wiping the sweat from my brow and trying to decide which law enforcement, exactly, I was supposed to call, I decided to call him instead.

"Hey man, how's it going? Listen, I have what may seem like an odd question. How old is K***?"

"She's 19", he said.

I said "You mean K***? Or the sister?"

He said "No, K*** is 19."

Amazingly he never asked me why I wanted to know. Perhaps he knew. I say that because she was a notorious "wild child". So I thanked him and went about my business fixing his computer. The really amazing part of the whole thing, to this day, is that the girl had those photos on her grandfather's computer. She had them in a folder in "My Photos" named "Special" as if that encypted them so ol' Grandpa couldn't get a peek. The absolute nerve of that girl.

Texas cops sue Tesla claiming 'systematic fraud' in Autopilot after Model X ploughed into two parked police cars

Re: Not fair

I don't know what state you're in but in mine, an individual officer can indeed be sued. The reason you mostly hear of a party suing the city, county, or state is the exact same reason as in this article where they didn't bother to sue the driver: the larger entity has the ability to pay more in the case of a lost suit. I know of at least one local case recently where a lady was injured and sued the police officers and firefighters who were present, as well as the city.

Where's the boss? Ah right, thorough deep-dive audit. On the boardroom table. Gotcha

Re: "WE ARE NOT HAVING AN AFFAIRE"

Off topic and I apologize, but "please do not mention my name" instantly brought back a memory of me saying those exact words. A certain city councilman in our city did not live inside the city limits. This is strictly forbidden. It was up to the mayor and other councilmen to suspend the offending one until such time as he did move inside the city limits or resign. I researched all this with our state officials who said it was my duty to report it to the city clerk, who in turn was duty-bound to inform all the council except the offending one, they would discuss the matter then officially inform him during the next council meeting.

My "please do not mention my name" went completely ignored as she informed nobody BUT the offending councilman who immediately walked straight up to my brother, a councilman, and said "I DO live in the city limits! I don't know where you're getting this crap!" and stormed off.

Politics being what they are, my brother later resigned himself and during the next election cycle, the "illegal" councilman ran for, and won, the mayor's seat.

P.S. He did NOT live in the city limits. Still doesn't. He uses his mother's address, who does, but he, his wife, and kids live in a house no less than 10 miles from the city limits.

Big Tech has a big problem with Florida passing a law that protects politicians from web moderation

All well and good, but...

The critics are keen to say that the new law causes racist, sexist, hate speech, etc. to be posted without limitation but the root of the problem here was and is these platforms censoring posts that may not be any of the things listed, only posts that do not keep with that particular platforms ideology. Print newspapers have always done this e.g "Letters to the Editor" will not be printed in the paper if the paper chooses not to but these digital platforms are not just refusing to publicize articles they disagree with, they are removing posts from areas where the general public is allowed to post almost anything without restriction. Only when someone started noticing exactly what it was that they were removing, namely things they personally didn't like, did it become an issue.

NASA's Perseverance rover in brick form: China set vs unofficial Lego fan design

Re: No, sorry.

""My instructions," he said, "are somewhat unique..." Then they are not unique. Unique is never qualified."

Perhaps a little nitpicky. I believe "somewhat" in this case was a verbal idiosyncrasy the guy used rather than his choice of an adjective to describe exactly to what degree his instructions are unique.

If no other instructions describe in detail and technical aspect the way he does, his are indeed textbook unique. I vote that we give the guy a break on his description of his instructions. The point of the story was his designs and excellent documentation, after all.

Apple, forced to rate product repair potential in France, gives itself modest marks

I imagine printing word-for-word a prepared statement in the form of an email would also be acceptable. Joking aside, even though I've noticed in my later years that most inexplicable policies can be traced to money one way or the other, I haven't been able to figure out why, exactly, that Apple and Google refuse to answer questions.

Is it simply because said questions are asking why they're being a dick about this or that? All they have to do is give a "politician" answer, aka no answer at all even after much talking, to at least try to give the illusion that they care. As it is, they don't appear to give F-all whether people like them or not.

HP loses attempt to deny colossal commission to star sales staffer

Almost happened to me but very far from the same scale...

A former boss (& owner) informed us one time that it was not fair for him to pay us the same even when business was slow. His idea was that our pay would be temporarily reduced at times.

Me being the senior technician, I was always expected to speak up as a "representative" at times like this which I didn't mind doing because I didn't particularly like the guy and I'm pretty sure he felt the same.

So I said, "Seems fair, but since the issue here is fairness, I believe I speak for all of us when I say that we will look forward to when business is better than usual since that will mean our pay will be increased above normal according to the same scale it was reduced."

He looked a little shocked then angry but didn't say anything. The pay reduction plan never got implemented. A wonder I never got fired but I didn't. I eventually quit after he insisted one time that we charge customers for work not performed.

Backers of Planet Computers' Astro Slide 5G phone furious after shock specs downgrade

Re: a lose keyboard is nothing like the same ergonomics

Indeed, but the loss would be less if the keyboard had been acting like a loser. Good riddance to it, I'd say.

Judge denies Parler an injunction to force AWS to host the antisocial network for internet outcasts

Fine line...

"Bile" though it may be, full of "hate and misinformation", that description also perfectly fits CNN and others for the last 4 years. I'm not defending Parler but only pointing out that different people like/will tolerate different things. I personally would not miss Twitter one bit if it were put out of business tomorrow, for example. I know many disagree. We have to be very careful cheering something being put out of business lest our "favorite pub" be next.

Watt's next for batteries? It'll be more of the same, not longer life, because physics and chemistry are hard

If life serves you lemons, make... power?

I have failed to see, in all this talk of electricity-producing items and chemistry, one mention of the tech that many of us learned about as wee lads. Naturally, I'm referring to sticking a copper and an aluminum pin into a lemon. I don't recall the amp/hours but I do know it works. For a mere 10 million, I could focus my attentions fiercely on this and produce something or another in the shape of a product. All failed experiments will be processed into lemonade and sold and so I promise to make the very best use of my capital. Interested investors just leave a tenner with the bartender of your choice and I'll go round collecting. Thank you.

Deloitte's 'Test your Hacker IQ' site fails itself after exposing database user name, password in config file

Consultants.....

I worked at a company where, quite unexpectedly and completely unannounced, the owner decided to contract an "ergonomics" consultancy firm to observe, then provide advice, for improving our physical movements to conduct our jobs more efficiently. WTF? We couldn't have been more shocked if he had introduced a voodoo priestess.

So these numb-skulls who had no clue whatsoever about WHAT our jobs were much less whether we were physically moving about in the most efficient manner, milled around aimlessly for about a week, baffled the owner with bullshit, and claimed what I confidently assume was a princely sum for their expertise.

Whatever advice it was that they provided him with, it never made it back to us and everyone just proceeded as before. I have to admit it did make me wonder if I indeed was moving about as efficiently as possible though. At lunch, for example, I held my sandwich on both sides, with both hands IOW, while about to take a bite. Is that the most efficient use of handage? Or would one hand have sufficed? But note that I said "wondered", not "lost sleep over" :)

Let's... drawer a veil over why this laser printer would decide to stop working randomly

Re: Low IQ or low volition?

Same here. Any repeat printer problems, such as changing "Default Printer" in Windows 3 times a week and then telling me they didn't do that, a phenomenon that I do not understand to this day, (Does anybody know why users do that so much?), they would occasionally require a "prolonged servicing" on their nice printer while in the meantime using one from the supply closet that although it printed, its arrival in the office or cubicle reduced the property value of said office/cubicle by about 75%.

Needless to say, as all of you can attest, the tech problems started getting solved when possible by "teamwork", that is to say, they asked other users if they had any ideas about fixing a small problem instead of calling us. And of course, they did and it worked fine.

Re: Low IQ or low volition?

Sounds good in theory but I tried that "explaining what went wrong" thing many times with 0% success rate. About 0.03 seconds into my explanation the glazed eyes and facial expression silently said "You have performed your duty and you are now dismissed." I stopped trying to explain unless they asked. Even then, the facial expression usually signalled that they were sorry they asked.

NSA: We've learned our lesson after foreign spies used one of our crypto backdoors – but we can't say how exactly

"Huawei, to Hades with thine evil spying ways! If there's any spying to be done on U.S. citizens, we'll be doing it, thank you." - NSA

Snowden was right: US court deems NSA bulk phone-call snooping illegal, possibly unconstitutional, and probably pointless anyway

Re: What is the point of the court ruling ?

"they know the current administration won't do anything about it." Perhaps, but this article is about the NSA's shenanigans from 7 years ago, well before the current administration.

Hootsuite melts ICE deal after staff revolt: CEO vows not to divide biz like agents divided families at the US border

Re: Snowflakes

And I downvoted you for downvoting someone for using a term you don't like. And also, probably, for using the term "Right Wing Neo-Nazi".

Re: Sympathy for the devils

Yes, but once you remove the political anger from this argument, what's left is a matter of employees telling employers what they will and won't do. I'm not a tyrant but if I instruct my employees, that's the way it will be done. My employees are an extension of me. They are there to do things because I can't divide myself into a hundred parts to do it myself. I hired them to help me, not have a discourse between each other over whether to follow my directions or not. If my ethics and morals don't match yours, you're perfectly free to quit and start your own company where you may do as you please.

Typical '80s IT: Good idea leads to additional duties, without extra training or pay, and a nuked payroll system

Does "just-barely-out-of-the-80's" count?

The worst nightmare I ever ran into regarding backups was one which I had not been responsible for doing (which covers 98% of backup problems, I imagine, as to which you good fellows can attest).

I got dispatched to the home office of a restaurant chain here in the Southeast with complaints of "It won't work and we tried everything." I was suspicious that I was walking into a huge mess just from talking to the lady for 2 minutes on the phone but my boss had every confidence that I could dispatch with their problem in no time at all.

So I arrive. Their "server" was an aged 486 (which, admittedly, was perfectly capable of being a server back then) stuck under the lady's desk upstairs and their "backups" were done "automatically" by the system via writing to a DVD drive. All the quote marks indicate things that were not that they were named, naturally.

The problems: They told me it ran Windows something-or-another but it was Unix, it was crashed so hard the logs were not readable (HDD had only tipped 96% over, not dead as in really dead yet) so I had no idea where to even start with a fix, and thinking maybe this backup, which was run "every day" she told me, could help me with at least a start, after replacing the drive

They were re-writeable, there was 7 of them, rotated daily. I pulled the DVDs and put them one at a time in my laptop's drive and each was _completely_ blank. So I had to be the bearer of that most horrible news "Your data is not only gone, it's gone for good." Some other local tech vendor had charged them a princely sum for this useless "backup system".

Bright side, the owner, who had shown up during all this placed the blame 100% on them and not me (I was shocked at that part) and even though they didn't use us for their IT needs later, we did handle her and her husband's systems at home which paid better than that nightmare at the home office ever would have.

Digital pregnancy testing sticks turn out to have very analogue internals when it comes to getting results

Re: "Surly we can come up with a similar device with replaceable strips?"

Actually, all the magic happens on the glucose meter strip. Contrary to popular belief, blood gets nowhere within 100 miles (okay, 1/4") of the inside of the meter. I'm just noting that. I realize that you didn't say that it did. The meter itself just does a little computing and displays what the strip told it to say. Namely that the blood, which traveled by capillary action to a certain spot on the strip and reacted with an enzyme called glucose oxidase, produced gluconic acid. This is measured between two electric terminals (still on the strip) and that info sent to the meter which then determines the number to display to you, hopefully between 100-140 (used to be 90-120). - A fellow finger-sticker since 1990 :)

The Wrath of Amazon: JEDI wars rage on after US Department of Defense affirms Microsoft contract

Is that really your bottom dollar?

If Amazon could afford to provide their unmatched, spectacular service that is (at least) like, 11,000 times better than Microsoft's for "tens of millions of dollars less", why didn't they bid that the first go-round? It reminds me of those street vendors that ask 100 quid for a t-shirt, you say "I only have 2 quid." and he says "Okay, sold."

Mate, it's the '90s. You don't need to be reachable every minute of every hour. Your operating system can't cope

Re: Now that's a title

In the military, in addition to having the most massive case of "If we can't make an acronym out of its name, we're not having it." you've ever seen, there's also the "It is required to have a "cool" name." syndrome.

I thought the same thing you did when I read the "combat computer technician" until I remembered that I had, many years ago, been an illustrious member of a "combat cargo" unit.

"What kind of highly trained black-ops, special-ops fellow are you anyway?", you say? We carried the big frozen boxes of food from the huge freezers below decks to the smaller cook's freezers up in the mess hall and also toted big boxes of mail from the helicopters that landed on the ships to the ship's mailroom. Real "combat cargo" type stuff, you know. I hope I don't get charged with revealing confidential military secrets now....

exiting the room walking backwards. Slowly.

Firefox maker Mozilla axes a quarter of its workforce, blames coronavirus, vows to 'develop new revenue streams'

Hard to believe...

Mozilla had 1,000 employees? Doing what? I've been a die-hard Firefox user pretty well since Day One but have been a little disillusioned with some of the "improvements" lately ("magnifying" address bar, anyone?) and a whole, whole lot disillusioned by them dropping Thunderbird. Yes, they certainly did. Phrase it however you want such as their excuse that "We are going to disentangle the technical infrastructure." but that's like saying "You're not fired, but you can't work here." Anyhow, what have the other 998 employees been doing lately?

Legal complaint lodged with UK data watchdog over claims coronavirus Test and Trace programme flouts GDPR

Re: Conspiracy time?

"They [Apple] really don’t want your personal data so they don’t have to waste their time handing it to the FBI."

Maybe Apple doesn't particularly WANT your data but they do hand it to the FBI.

Small excerpts from their "Legal Process Guidelines" PDF:

1) "Apple will provide content in response to a search warrant issued upon a showing of probable cause."

2) "Apple has a centralized process for receiving, tracking, processing, and responding to legitimate legal requests from government, law enforcement, and private parties..."

3) etc.

BoJo buckles: UK govt to cut Huawei 5G kit use 'to zero by 2023' after pressure from Tory MPs, Uncle Sam

We shall not suffer our citizenry to be spied upon!

The U.S. has some huge balls to accuse somebody of spying 2 days after the articles were printed outlining the move by the government to allow FBI surveillance of web users data (presumably via ISPs) and without warrants. Add to that the actions of the illustrious NSA, who has people pulling their laptops apart and looking with magnifying glasses to see if any suspicious-looking chips are present and we have a populace who's so used to being spied on, they don't give one rat whether Huawei joins in.

Tales from the crypt-oh: Nvidia accused of concealing $1bn in coin-mining GPU sales as gaming revenue

You win some, you lose some.

The investors "gambled", lost, and now want their money back. Wouldn't we all love to be able to sue Las Vegas for our money back? Bad example, perhaps, but still. The only way for that way of thinking (If I win at handsome odds, I want the money. If I suffer a loss or at least not gain what I thought I would, I want my money back.) to be 100% fair would be that if the investors, upon investing in a later-wildly-successful venture, were only paid back what they invested, with perhaps some pittance of interest.

Now there's nothing stopping the PATRIOT Act allowing the FBI to slurp web-browsing histories without a warrant

Re: Please... can some TLA

Will someone PLEASE dox Trump's tax records before these people's heads literally explode? You know how he gets the opposition to want something they never even realized they wanted? By saying he's not going to reveal it.