Re: Who is the judge ?
Is it certainly in this group because you don't like it, and what you dislike must be wrong, or is there some objective reason for believing so?
214 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Feb 2020
Hard to actually sell many thousands of those terminals in the PRC without approval though, and the people putting thousands of satellites up there expect to make a profit from it. If the terminals are manufactured in China then the authorities are in a position to inflict pain on the manufacturer; if they're made elsewhere then they can get a grip on the importer. A few smuggled in aren't going to be a great concern to those authorities because they make nice beacons to find the discontented.
While arguing that it's the company running the restaurant that's solely responsible might be reasonable, their actual arguments seem to be that Piccolo is suing everyone possible (a 'shotgun pleading') and their arbitration should take place first, and that clicking on accepting their terms and conditions means that Piccolo is contractually bound to go to arbitration for any dispute against Disney. Most of Disney's lawyers argument is about the latter. You can see the text at the bottom of the article here: longisland.news12.com/disney-asks-court-to-dismiss-wrongful-death-lawsuit-of-long-island-doctor
Not Yahoo, no. Take a quick look at this map - the icon sizes don't represent anything in particular, but you can see that the other independent sources (not front ends) for search are Yandex, Mojeek and Yep. Brave is semi-independent. https://www.searchenginemap.com
Various social media platforms get better engagement through outrage. Detecting and removing outraging material is against their interests, and expecting them to come up with an effective means of doing so isn't reasonable in their view.
Then of course there's the way that many very rich people find the culture wars useful to prevent action against their growing fortunes, or outright agree with the reactionary nutcases (Lachlan Murdoch, Elon Musk).
Basically 'challenging' AI/ML to solve the problem is up against a lot more problems than technical ability to do so. If you come up with a way then the people in charge of implementing it have incentives to undermine it.
If they expect to find problems and to have to make changes from the testing then skipping the testing is likely to result in some embarrassing failure. Stuck at a 90 degree angle to the lunar surface or something. Saving the embarrassment is probably worth a lot to NASA and there's costs in running the mission besides the hardware too - staff running the mission, mostly.
Well, they already are if you're sufficiently unlucky; see that Florida house (the owner is now suing NASA for $80,000, which seems low for a US lawsuit), or a few other places over the years. I was thinking more of the sort of dust which rains down slowly though, like the sort that some scientists were collecting from very old roofs in Kent, UK (https://www.kent.ac.uk/news/science/33894/kent-scientists-search-for-cosmic-dust-at-englands-oldest-cathedrals).
A fair bit of orbital debris ends up as something other than nanoparticles - starting with the debris from batteries dumped from the ISS which hit a Florida house, but I expect other debris may simply be small-but-not-nanoparticles. Assuming it all turns into nanoparticles in the ozone layer is probably unnecessarily pessimistic.
It can find the manual if the manual is correctly tagged, or possibly if it's pointed at a great wodge of your internal documents it'll come up with something like the right one. Or possibly it'll work from an out of date version and not tell you; no way of telling from this if I'm reading it correctly.
Okay, I can see helpdesk staff rejoicing at an answer to one of the common problems in an office biz - "The computer ate my stuff! Hours of work gone even days! How are you going to get it back?" - but the biz is likely to take a dim view of all this proprietary info sloshing around on desktops and laptops with minimal control. It's entirely outside whatever document management system they'll have installed.
I suspect that the Recall system going wild and trying to fill up the hard disk is a potential new problem for the helpdesk too.
The initial use case would be much smaller; I'm betting that they're more expensive per watt generated than turbines sitting on the ground and would mainly be of use for generating a bit of power when the wind's low at ground level, to smooth out the variability there. 10% of a medium-large advanced economy's power budget isn't 'modest' by anyone's standard.
Older mice - well, circa 1990, the first time I saw one - were pretty crappy with a tendency to get stuck on one vertical or horizontal line and collecting dirt and hand grease like that was their purpose. I can see wanting to make a computer which bypasses the entire concept. As we know that didn't work though. Keyboards also suck in their own way when dealing with graphical displays.
Those cost money. The frunk's got power to open and close because that looks cool, but it's got the absolute cheapest version without the safety features - for humans or the car - that other manufacturers have because that's the way Elon rolls.
The legal stuff does need to be sorted out before useful commercial content can be a real thing though. There's more than one reason for Audible to reject your potential AI-voiced audiobook - would you even own the copyright to it? If not, would Audible face legal hassles later if they sold access to it? There's common sense ways to deal with such issues but no guarantees that all legal systems will follow the 'common sense' path.
I have a gmail account. I don't use it a lot, but practically the only commercial email there is from places where I did sign up to something (one exception this week, I can't remember the last one before that - it wasn't in the last month), and the unsubscribe links work. It's weird how many people apparently have such bad experiences with it - I don't know what the difference is.
You haven't heard of social media influencers? There's money on TikTok, though most of us aren't good looking enough or charismatic enough to succeed. As to whether TikTok users vote - some will. They haven't previously been an identifiable demographic but banning their playground may change that.