Re: Just gave the attacker her number?
Providing the PII is identified as such, and not just included as an aside in the witness statements that'd work. There's a solid chance that whoever released the documents didn't actually read them.
420 publicly visible posts • joined 8 Feb 2020
I saw a MSDOS machine running a program to control which doors each access card could open in about 2005. No actual access to the Internet but I was assured that the Lemmings Christmas Edition program on it couldn't actually be there; floppy disks aren't a major access flaw once they're no longer easy to get I guess.
It's expensive, and they may not be able to access the criminal's assets to defray the cost. They may even not win the cases, especially (but not only) if they rely on info with sources the spies don't want to give up. And it's probably a performative policy anyway, the people who know they're known to US authorities will be keeping out of their way and not trying to enter the country.
IIRC Airbus does some odd stuff involving absurdly large spreadsheets. Do you, or anyone, have a ready to go substitute (which doesn't involve sneering 'so don't do that!') which a risk-averse corporation would approve of? And whatever other workflow, automation and bespoke software built on Office they may have.
Replacing it all is a huge project as the article points out. I'd think a decent number of medium-to-large size projects rather than doing it all in one go would be the way, but what do I know.
Keeping in- and out-wallets entirely separate while controlling both is a problem which has caught would-be money launderers before. The actual mixer likely works as advertised (not certainly), but if an X amount of bitcoin leaves your wallet and the same enters your girlfriends' while your two devices at the same physical location access the mixer then you haven't done enough to not be tracked later, judging by media reports.
It does help if you're in Russia and don't need to worry about American law enforcement getting hold of those devices.
There's a lot of significant figures there despite AI content detection being pretty unreliable. The different result from originality.ai may come from differing detection tools rather than a differing definition of longform; which gives at least +/- 7% uncertainty. I can well believe that the general trends there are real, but don't trust three significant figures of precision on those numbers, or even one.
Ores on the Moon are mostly awful, as far as we know. A total lack of water concentrating and separating the ores, and a lot less in the way of rocks melting underground and being returned to the surface (well, once, but not repeatedly). If you could drop bits of rocket 50 km away it might be worth collecting the metal if you were desperate to manufacture on the Moon. You would have to be desperate though because as you pointed out this is not an automatic process.
Mostly. And then occasionally you get a mistranslation, and hopefully the human reading the output is awake enough to realise that 'kidneys' have nothing to do with the subject discussed (actual example). A more subtle error might fly through undetected even with a fully awake human.
AI is viable when cheap and fast is your preferred two of the three. If clawing back the full cost (or recognising the full cost in technical debt in software) makes it just fast then it has a really narrow future, if it's still fairly cheap then it has a solid future - I suspect the Amazon guy is trying to preserve 'cheap'. Not everything has to be good, and it looks like AI won't be.
AI companies have promised to cut your costs, and the people in charge of this policy and job ad desperately want that to be a real thing, which they can make happen if they push long and hard enough. They won't hear that the promise is a lie ... probably ever. Once people have committed to a belief like that they don't usually back down. They'll need to be forced out one way or another.
They're counting on the Democrats either having too much to clean up, or being unwilling to go full fascist with the infrastructure that's been set up here. Then when the wheel turns and the Republicans are in power aagain they can pick up where they left off. I don't believe they're in a position to render elections irrelevant in the current electoral cycle, but they do plan to be there eventually.
Perhaps they used a more sophisticated approach to excluding antisemitism than trying to avoid sites with it. You can do a lot of suff with the training data for LLMs which hasn't generally been thought worth doing in the rush to pour data into the beast's maw, but I can believe that a bunch of generally American companies might have made not looking antisemitic a priority.
Dunno that there's enough staff at Meta for spying to make a real difference. LLMs want really a lot of input, not just eighty thousand monkeys hammering away. It looks more like clutching at straws - Meta's AI is well behind the pack.
https://isaiprofitable.com shows Meta having spent $230 billion on AI for only $3 billion of revenue, bad even by AI standards. I wouldn't take it as gospel but it does suggest they might be the first out of the business if true.
A few sample return missions would make a lot more sense in the foreseeable future than trying to set up a colony which couldn't be self-sustaining for many decades or even centuries, but writing it off forever is a bit early IMO. Perhaps some day there will be grand projects better assembled under 0.38 G than 1 G, or some resource worth returning to Earth (perhaps with then much lower transit costs) might be found.
BTW why do you call out glass and steel? Mars definitely has silica, carbonates and iron compounds,
> A full 48 percent of practicing US Christians told the organization that they trusted AI’s advice to aid their spiritual growth.
> 73 percent are worried AI will cause loss of religious faith
In the same survey, even. With the minimum possible overlap there would seem to be a contradiction. Either a quarter or more of the respondents are 1+ of {insane, taking the mickey}, or the triumph of the ego you can see plenty of out there is leading people to think AI is good for their own wise spiritual development while being bad for those other poor weak-minded fools. I think they call that the sin of pride (to go with any others they may have, of course.)
Reports from Aus are that those kids who abuse the internet still do, while those less deeply involved may find accessing health info, or anything they actually need to know about sexuality more difficult. No benefits, some potentially serious costs; this is a dumb idea.
Apparently you can sue to overrule town councils which reject datacenters in America. Capital really does rule there.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/a-michigan-farm-town-voted-down-plans-for-a-giant-openai-oracle-data-center-weeks-later-construction-began/ar-AA22uI76
When the AI guesses wrong about what you want to do with your mouse untangling it will take longer than a simple mouse click, possibly much longer. I'm sure it'll still be possible to do other actions and follow other paths but this software will make it harder. If all the usual right-click menus are still there, then learning the use of this kind of desktop takes longer because you have to know the AI procedures and the prior procedures; if not, definitely go with the 'much longer' to disentangle misunderstandings.
Plus all the problems about expense if a remote AI (once it's fully priced in) or a fairly massive overhead if it's local, and Moore's Law is not current.
Autonomous escorts may protect your crewed ships, but they'll have plenty of demands for maintenance at sea by people coming over temporarily, and operators on other ships to keep them doing the jobs they should I expect - not sure there'll be a genuine saving in people required. Certainly they'll need industry to make them. I think the idea is to make sure your crrewed ships are protected and to keep squishy and hard to replace people out of the line of fire.
The amount of lobbying received depends on most routers and phones being manufactured offshore. If it were about protecting US manufacturing then the new protections would be targeted at manufacturing that does exist and which could be scaled up, rather than that which doesn't and won't exist. Assume it's all about the grift and you'll have a better explanation for Trump's executive orders than the good of the nation.
"these IT workers can earn more than $300,000 a year, and upwards of 100,000 North Koreans are spread across 40 countries generating approximately $500 million a year"
Divide that out and you can see a ceiling on how many of these North Koreans are earning more than 300 grand in a year. It's not a lot.
Looks like you missed a couple of paragraphs in this article:
"The second stage is facility-level cooling, which transfers heat from the facility to the outside environment. This may involve water consumption depending on the technology employed, such as cooling towers that rely on evaporation, or air-cooled systems supplemented by direct evaporation or adiabatic cooling to reduce the peak power demand during the hottest days of the year.
A large server farm that relies on evaporation cooling can suck up millions of gallons of water per day during the hottest periods of the year, the report says, significantly more than at other times."
Old glass windows are thicker at the bottom because they were installed that way - if the glass has varying thickness due to your manufacturing process, putting it in thick end down is more stable than the reverse. Glass is like a liquid, but it isn't one and won't actually flow at all.
Oak gall ink which burns into the vellum is pretty stable when used sparingly, but there's a lot more such writing which has actually burned through the vellum over the centuries turning it into a strange form of lacework. And still more which was lost to time some other way - damp, fire, insects, chucked out, being repurposed to some other use...assuming that these plates will be preserved forever by descendants waiting on our every word is a strange sort of arrogance.