* Posts by azander

8 publicly visible posts • joined 7 Feb 2020

If your AI does the crime, you'll do the time, warns DoJ

azander

Treat the AI like an employee....

If the DOJ was serious about cracking down, they should treat the AI as an Employee of the company.

However since it is not human or a citizen of the US, and is a physical Asset like any other computer or program, it can't claim any special status, plead for immunity or even use the 5th Amendment to protect itself from self incrimination. If the DOJ does that, then the companies would see the AI as a very large liability instead of something good for business. It would do what they want, with very little cost to the DOJ.

DOJ: Here is a warrant for the collection and incarceration of your AI. We will be questioning it at our leisure. No, you can't have an attorney present, it has no rights.

Company: We'll sue!

DOJ: Of course you will. Too bad your AI is an "Asset", not an employee, that can be searched and queried without representation or advocacy.

Company: Bankruptcy!

BOFH: It's not generative AI at all, it's degenerate AI

azander

Sounds like they are going the way of the Jetsons. They need one person to 'press the button' for some obscure, or externally forced, reason. Then you have IT who have to replace hardware when needed, and someone to 'manage' the, albeit small, staff. That same person probably is the CEO, so he can get his bonuses etc. for all of the good work the AI did, and to sign paperwork since the laws don't accept AI as a legal entity.

When the AI needs someone to upgrade the hardware they call the BOFH, who then calls the button pusher to assist him. That keeps the BOFH and PFY employed, and of course the director, because they need a 'human'-like entity to deal with the outdated corporation still out there when negotiating contracts, etc.

Exchange Online blocked from sending email to AOL and Yahoo

azander

AOL is hosted on Yahoo these days.

azander

Re: Alternatively, perhaps just pick up the phone and have a chat

This is assuming you can still get an old fashioned copper land-line. They are no longer available around here. Not even for Fax systems. Best you can do is get a digital line, that's fiber to the RT, then copper to the premises. Dialup doesn't work well over those lines, if at all.

I happen to work for an ISP, in Michigan USA, that still offers dialup, because some people can't get anything else, and that includes satellite.

Have a digital line? Best speed we have seen so far is 24K. Most are in the 12 to 14K range.

How is this problem mine, techie asked, while cleaning underground computer

azander
Facepalm

Re: Dickensian

Press room of a medium sized newspaper. Press was built pre 1968 (the year it was installed).

The iMac used to verify the print runs has been replaced 4 times since January 2023 and this last time, in early July, the back was wrapped in cardboard, with minimal airflow from the top, just to reduce the ink dust. So far it works well. It is a really old iMac there since it will die sometime soon just like the others.

The keyboard for that machine is in a clear plastic bag that they replace weekly because they can't see the keys any more. Still working on a way to keep from having to replace the mouse so often. Nasty stuff newsprint ink. It has to be scrubbed off surfaces, or use a very harsh solvent, to get it off any surface.

Musk's X caught throttling outbound links to websites he doesn't like

azander

320 be damned?

IF this throttling is true, and from my less than scientific tests show it is, then isn't X now in violation of section 320? The section that the Politicians want to kill? It is a fairly easy violation to prove or disprove. Maybe someone at the NYT or the other sites should step up and sue X for this violation. This will test, in court, the power of Section 320 and test the ability for private busineses to filter content either through outright censorship or throttling.

Techie wasn't being paid, until he taught HR a lesson

azander

Re: Unique keys

Not so much father and Son but Grandfather and Grandson. My Grandfather and I share the exact same name. My father has a different name. So no Sr. Jr, or I, II, II, etc. We both lived in the same town, and by coincidence we shared the same house number on different streets in the same city, This took place back in the early 1990's

Local bank was nice, but was bought out by a bigger bank. So far no problem. Then an even larger bank comes in and renumbers the accounts, using Lastname, Firstname for ordering of accounts with the new numbers. Now My account, My parents Account, 2 Uncles, 1 aunt, and my grandparent's accounts are in sequence, instead of spread out over many years of account number increments. All of a sudden My checks are bouncing. Seems my paycheck was being deposited, by the teller into my grandfather's account. Checks I wrote were either processed by his account or by mine, but since my account had no money the one processed on the right bounced. Grandfather was having similar problems. Our account numbers were different by the last digit alone. When you looked at the screen, the accounts were almost identical, except for street name. Same house number, same First, Middle, and Last names. There were even mixing my other relative's accounts. We checked, even our SSN numbers were similar but because of timing the first half was very different. The last 4 were similar, but with even mild dyslexia they would look the same.

It took us 3 months to get them to see they had made errors, and that the "big bank" was at fault. The fun part was that my father, an attorney specializing in Ranch law (Lots of land contracts, stock agreements, banking, etc) walked in with every member of our extended family, and handed them a request for everyone's account information. We had all signed it. When the Account manager started to say he couldn't do that, the local branch manager was called and told he needed to be at the bank within the next 30 minutes or we were going to take the bank to court. Shortly there after the Branch manager was there, in his office sweating the proverbial bullets as he read over our complaint, and watched as we sorted there every transactions since they renumbered our account with my Accountant Uncle. They then showed them each and every Banking law they had broken with their negligence. It was fun watching them go back and forth tearing down the Branch manager. Then I stepped up, being a computer programmer (recent graduate at the time) to show them how they could have avoided that with a simple change to the probable routine they used to renumber all our accounts. After that we pulled all our money from the bank, IN CASH (not cashier's checks), walked across the road to the local credit union and opened accounts there, making sure that they didn't number our account sequentially. I believe we took out about a quarter of their on-hand cash at that point. I know they didn't keep much on-hand, and would send to the larger District bank about 3 hours away if for some reason they needed more. It wasn't a payday week so they wouldn't have had extra on-hand.

Approximately 6 months later the local office of the big bank was forcibly closed, and the government had to step in. I don't have many details as we had already closed our accounts, and were only notified of the FDIC stepping in because there may have been money owed to us. No other notifications were sent to us after that one.

BOFH: Darn Windows 7. It's totally why we need a £1k graphics card for a business computer

azander

This might be a good thing. Industry leaders call it downsizing.