Re: "For the PostgreSQL core server, AWS employs…."
Would postgres be a better project if AWS contributed 100% of the development effort...?
16 publicly visible posts • joined 31 Jan 2020
Yes, this is the core issue. The commercial landscape has changed. OSS developers used to rely on selling support to put bread on the table but the big cloud providers have pulled the rug out from under them
One solution would be for AWS & co to voluntarily donate funds back to the OSS projects they benefit from. But as a previous poster noted: rich people didn't get rich by giving their money to others...
It's worth bearing in mind that these riders are towards the elite end of the sport. So good performances on Zwift may result in sponsorship deals or even professional contracts. Not condoning the actions, but just pointing out there is a temptation there for those desperate to break into the professional ranks.
Vendors should be required to provide security updates for a minimum period from product release (e.g. 5 years). And this end date should be clearly printed on the box when you purchase it.
My moto g5 ceased to receive updates in Feb 2019, which means it got 23 months of updates from release (pathetic).
Of course vendors will never do this voluntarily because it takes away one reason for you to buy their next shiny model with a bunch features you'll never use and a screen the size of a barn door.