Re: Evil Browsers?
Hadn't thought of blocking DoH, so thanks the nudge and the block list :)
53 publicly visible posts • joined 15 Jan 2020
Have an upvote :)
I've tried a bunch of things and Gnome is fine - it gets out of the way and lets me do stuff. It's the default on some distros and I don't have a problem with that. It's opinionated, which can work both ways. I don't have nvidia, so my desktop experience isn't dictated by whether a driver is working properly or not.
That said, you don't have to look too hard to see some obvious bugs/features like how it steals focus when there's a pop-up/toast visible - which is crap when you're on a big screen.
KDE is also OK.
Cosmic looks interesting...
I quite like ChromeOS, so I know that makes me a bit odd - it sits in a middle ground between Windows and Linux from a UX perspective.
I think most people here can agree that Windows is getting worse, not better.
I should probably also mention that I really am not a fan of MacOS, despite loving the hardware and some of the other software - it would be far better WITH gnome! :D
It's nice to have choice on Linux, because ultimately we're all different and like different things.
I tend to mark myself as offline (grey - as if the computer is off) and then make a point of messaging and responding to people and joining meetings... since setting your status to "Do not disturb" appears to mean "Please disturb me", and status will turn orange in a heartbeat even if you're on the computer, I think the Teams status indicator is invalid and treat it as such.
I also used to enjoy clicking "Meet now" and doing a quick screen share, with just myself in the call...
I'm also interested in an M4 version - I suspect the limitation is down to GPU drivers, but there's bound to be other things as well.
I seem to recall watching a video about "device trees" that explained a lot of the difficulties - still, I suspect there will be support at some point in the future.
Ignoring any of the conversation around who's spying on what, this sounds quite interesting.
If you could create something "new" to do what Bluetooth does now, and could jettison a bunch of legacy backwards compatibility, you might have a fighting chance of creating something a bit more reliable.
Presumably this sits on 2.4GHz?
Can we assume it's less onerous from a patents/licensing perspective?
My understanding is that Bromcom's MIS is being deployed across NI schools - but that would be a fraction of the 485 million over how many years.
I'm fairly familiar with the software they'll use at the EANI side to aggregate school data.
Where is the rest of the money going? Consultancy? Equipment?
I notice that PayPal will let my PC login using a Passkey on my phone... and I have to type in a TOTP as well (with the authenticator also on my phone).
Whilst still having MFA, this feels more convoluted than just using a password manager to me - which I guess is the main thrust of this article.
It is possible to switch to a Variable Direct Debit with most providers - thereby paying for what you use, rather than some daft estimation. There are no penalties for doing so. Martin Lewis/MoneySavingExpert mentions it at least once a year when discussing energy bills.
Octopus would like to charge me £207 per month, but I pay £0 since switching to VDD because I've generated sufficient solar credit over the course of the "summer" to carry me through. Come February the credit will run out, and I'll simply pay whatever I've used In essence I'm receiving credit, rather than offering it against my will to a cash strapped energy provider...
To be fair, it's pretty dead here most Friday nights... :p
...but there are a fair number of people unhappy with the infrastructure projects that are largely to connect London with North Sea wind farms. Especially in an area with frequent power cuts.
A group of those people have valid grounds for concern, and should be listened to, but another group of those people howl at the moon. I don't think that phenomenon is unique to Norfolk...
Given that midday is supposed to be when the sun is at its highest (not 1pm), I agree that the working day is wrong not the time
Obviously there's a bunch of factors like staring at a screen for a living (which probably does all manner of untold harm), flexible hours and remote working that kind of make the time of day largely irrelevant for a proportion of the population.
Perhaps the Chinese are onto something...
I work with Local Authorities, and it seems to me that the left and right hand can't agree on the most simple things which is why projects overrun and there's scope creep. I'm not convinced councils are going to agree on how everyone does the same job slightly differently without intervention.
Part of the problem is the history of incumbent IT systems and vendors who don't like to interoperate - and it's not like Councils like change (well, not on the scale required).
There still appears to be a tremendous amount of wastage/duplication in local government, and not be even the slightest intention of doing anything about it. Empires need to be built; it's all about headcount/budget size/"power".
I get the impression the current "cheap" rates are because they have to compensate for coverage/speed - together they'd offer something interesting with their mix of spectrum and 5G SA.
As for the 2 year "promise", I suspect they'll do whatever they have to in order to remain competitive and maintain or improve revenue.
I'm not completely against the merge - I can see some benefits.
I'm asking, because I don't know, but... how does a "proper" hearing aid compare battery wise with airpods/pixel buds/galaxy buds etc?
Obviously with earbuds you pop them in the case, they charge, then you get a few hours of use - presumably you get days of use out of a regular hearing aid?
If you're constantly popping them in the case, their utility/convenience diminishes somewhat - but then thinking about it, I'm not sure if targeting those at the less severe end of the hearing loss spectrum means that constant use is required?
Agree.
It feels like people are arguing over a "separation of concerns", which requires defining some common ground - presumably, that has not been a requirement until Rust appeared.
And the reluctance to help ("a skilled C developer can just look through the code and work it out") is not the same as defining a contract, or understanding the intention of the code, and points to a problem with people rather than a technical problem.
If it was C talking to C, but maintaining separation, there'd still be issues - it feels like the argument is a C dev can play on either side of the fence to make something work, but doesn't want to sort out the fence. That feels like an anti-pattern.
With an org like Google, people issues can be managed better and projects can succeed - with the Linux kernel, less so.
People aren't keen on change..
"and just uses the appropriate driver"
That's kind of the problem - the driver is likely to be a blob provided by the chip vendor, and when they stop providing updates that's your lot. That was certainly one reason that was used in the past (specifically Qualcomm not playing along).
I believe that's one reason Google can go for 7 years - they provide the driver for their hardware.
I may be wildly off the mark.
[Alex Ziskand made a video about a similar problem for the new ARM based Windows co-pilot PCs: https://youtu.be/uhfO1IDFMrQ]
I think (possibly incorrectly) that whilst the hardware is an important aspect of the Pi offering, the ecosystem/community that swarm around a selection of common devices is possibly more valuable.
There are hundreds of Rockchip and N100 devices that exist, and are arguably better value in some circumstances... but the number of Pi devices in circulation, and the size of the community means there's really good support if you need it. You're less likely to get a BIOS/firmware update and ongoing support for the generic RK3588/N100 boards on Ali Express.
That said, I think the more interesting stuff is happening on the Pico/Zero devices - they're the essence of the original Pi.
I'm kind of conflicted on this - they _have_ to be secure, because their entire business seems to revolve around holding lots of data against an individual. The second they mess up, will be the second the lose it all. So, paradoxically, I trust them with my data - I just wish they didn't have so much of it.
I get what you're saying, and perhaps that's what the marketing machine is trying to imply? "it makes your internet faster === better for gaming" or something along those lines.
Normal wifi is somewhere in the region of 1-3ms latency and wired is <1ms on a simple LAN (we're not talking multiple hops, VLANs or anything fancy). Presumably getting the latency down nearer to ethernet is a good thing; a worthwhile technical improvement - although of little practical/tangible benefit right now.
Since I didn't directly answer the question (assuming it was a question), the DMA is dependent upon activity within the EEA - so the EU + Iceland, Liechtenstein & Norway. One assumes that this also determines where the law should apply.
Apple only mentions the EU in their PR blurb - not the EEA, EFTA states, continent of Europe, sovereign nations in close proximity to Europe, participating countries in the Eurovision Song Contest, or indeed the moon Europa.
Genuine (Dopey) question... how do they use T-Mobiles North American spectrum? Presumably that same spectrum is used by other providers in other places? I can get that they might just "turn off the satellite" when it flies over somewhere other than America, but presumably the satellite can see a number of different countries from that far up... So, could it work in Europe, or would there have to be some kind of spectrum harmonisation?
Android Studio, VS Code... even Audacity for a quick bit of sound editing, or Wireguard and qBittorent for some impromptu piracy... they're remarkably "not bad".
Add in Android support, and you've got something considerably more versatile than a content consumption device with a keyboard - which is how most people view them. For a vocal minority of people I suspect ChromeOS is dead in the water because of Google's involvement - which I see as no better or worse than Apple or Microsoft.
I'm particularly fond of my Pixelbook Go.
I'm curious, why not? What could Google do with that information that is so heinous?
I'm more concerned about popular apps like WhatsApp amd TikTok scraping data they don't need, and yet people appear to have no qualms with using WhatsApp.
If I "live" in the Google or Apple ecosystem and my browsing data doesn't leave it, and my experience is enhanced by having access to it, I don't really mind. A lot of people don't mind.
Chromebooks are great for a variety of tasks, and I am more comfortable entering my tax return on one than I would using Windows 11 with Edge. An Apple computer running Safari might arguably be better, but likely significantly more expensive than a Chromebook/box. Of course, if I really wanted privacy (assuming it was even possible) there are alternatives that require compromises - and it's great because those options are there for the people that really want/need them.
However, for a lot of people, a Chromebook is an acceptable compromise of cost, ease of use, utility and privacy. And extending support as reported enhances that proposition further.
The telco provides access to content and bills accordingly.
The fact that a lot of that content ends up being with a single provider is coincidental - the telco either needs to provide access to it, or offer a product without access to it (which customers will avoid if they're after, in this case, Netflix).
If something is being sold metered (e.g. 100GB for £10) or unlimited for £20, it better be able to deliver it...
This feels like a symptom of a monopoly/lack of competition.
(all very reminiscent of the same problem in the US, and people banging on about net neutrality... telcos looking for other people to pay for their infrastructure)
I don't have an issue with going into the office to interact/"socialise" with colleagues - it can be useful, and you interact with others more naturally than you would over Teams or whatever (e.g. overhearing someone talking about something you're working on, catching up with people when making a cup of tea/coffee etc). Moreover you have an opportunity to interact with people you might not ordinarily interact with when remote. The interaction is more natural/organic rather than contrived/forced.
And I guess different jobs require different levels of interaction - I don't work in Sales or Marketing, I work in Development... as such my productive time is *not* talking to people, it's doing things.
The thing I'm not convinced by is the "3 days a week" - I can get all of the benefits of popping into the office in a single afternoon once a week, with diminishing returns for any additional time after that.
Three days feels arbitrary, and it doesn't take the employees job into account. It feels like it's more about the regressive "bums on seats" mentatility of certain managers, rather than tangible productivity improvements.
If the big companies account for 50%+ of traffic, then it would seem the telcos are selling a service to access the big companies... meaning they should probably foot the bill for access, or not provide access (and lose customers to competitors who do). If they sell an "upto <blah>mbps" service, they should expect people to want to use it - irrespective of the origin of the data - even if the business model is to sell an over subscribed/contended service for as much as they can get away with... the inter-connects are the price of providing a service. There are no options to buy "cheap internet, but without tiktok, youtube, facebook and netflix" - even though there are some that might actually like the option.
It sounds like a rerun of the net neutrality stuff in the US that got talked about a few years back, where the ISPs didn't want to just provide dumb pipes, but were also trying to "add value" with their own TV services (or whatever).
Whatever happens, customers will pay more to cover these new costs because either their netflix sub will go up or their telco sub will... because neither of those two groups of companies ever try to price gouge at every available opportunity...
"business processes to clear out the pointless and the stupid, and to simplify them. Then think about (re-)computerization"
it's very similar to paying a management consultancy to simplify business processes, so that, at a later date, you can pay a management consultancy to add lots of process to "fix things"... at no point will you actually fix the root cause of any issues.
i'm sure this system will be quoted for with an unattainable ROI which is dependent upon people doing things differently, or not at all... as someone above has mentioned, people will carry on clinging to the "way we've always done it", even if that way is wrong...
Let's be honest, the email bit is incidental... They're using Gmail for identity more than anything else; combined with various forms of tracking they've got a lot more useful info than whatever is in someone's inbox.
I disagree with the article... Amazon might not get increased revenue from Alexa, but then they're not as pervasive as Google - Tracking a high percentage of all web traffic and some 2 billion phone users... The datasets gained feed back into ads etc whereas Alexa doesn't feed into sales activity for Amazon. I see the scale/cost of running YouTube being far more of an Achilles heel than Gmail.
I guess Sage is "sticky" so this is a calculated risk - but there are plenty of competitors... Guess it's all about that annually recurring revenue... But the fact they've not moved to TLS 1.2 a lot quicker is quite perplexing given POODLE attack was discovered back in 2014!
Surely 5G, with reduced latency, lower power consumption, higher user density for the same spectrum would be a better use of 2100MHz? Would help a lot with 5G coverage, rather than putting 4G there.
(and no point interleaving 2G in that spectrum)