* Posts by emfexpert

4 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Jan 2020

5G signals won't make men infertile, sighs UK ad watchdog as it bans bonkers scary poster

emfexpert

EU review on 5G

Petition on potential health risks of electromagnetic fields and the 5G rollout

08-01-2020 - 12:37

At the meeting of 21 January 2020, the Members will examine a petition on the potential health and environmental risks stemming from the 5G (5th generation) mobile networks. The petition challenges the most recent opinion by the Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR), which argues that there is no reason to be concerned about exposure to electromagnetic fields, as allegedly inconsistent and conflicting.

The petitioner calls for a non-biased and thorough literature review by the EU, which will take into account all viewpoints when assessing the potentially harmful health and environmental effects of electromagnetic fields.

emfexpert

Do you think the ASA will admit they got it wrong when the data is irrefutable, of course they won't, who at the ASA is qualified to comment on such things?.

Of course the four fold increase of glioblastoma brain tumours in France is Irrefutable. for those of you that don't know, they are pretty much inoperable.

And all this press coverage is wonderful for all the Electrosensitives out there looking for support.

emfexpert

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2019-004409_EN.html?fbclid=IwAR3NuMQIpLyjivn1dDPL5V1IKRAJZy-_vwhHwROrxbDUCYwwIufA4Yx_vtc#def5

emfexpert

Talk about the Fox Gaurding the Henhouse.

The Commission’s Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) decided to endorse, during its 2014-2019 mandate, the view of the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection (ICNIRP) that the only risk of harm associated with electromagnetic fields (EMF) is from thermal effects (1) – a statement that has proven to be wrong (2) . Santé publique France recently recalled the risk factors for glioblastoma solid tumors, stating that ‘the latest epidemiological studies and animal experiments would support the carcinogenic role of exposure to electromagnetic fields’ (3) .

1 Which members of SCENIHR are also members of ICNIRP? How does the Commission ensure that its scientific committee provides an independent and balanced interpretation of the scientific findings when its members may have conflicting interests with other organisations?

2 How does the Commission assess the well-documented chain of reactions – EMF; activation of calcium channels; excess production of free radicals; damage to DNA; observed increase of glioblastoma and other relevant brain tumors (4) – in its policy regarding 5G?

3 How does the Commission intend to bring the deployment of 5G into line with the fight against cancer which President von der Leyen has set as a high priority? Does it consider visible-light communications (VLC / LiFi) to be an answer?