Go away kid...
Go away kid... you bother us.
229 publicly visible posts • joined 9 Dec 2019
that First Amendment to the US Constitution: Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Not quite. It goes into the national debt and is covered by a treasury bond sale. The buyer is the treasury itself so it's like a self eating watermelon or "qualitative easing" depending on how you like to spin it.
As the economy improves, the bond is paid back to the treasury or sold off to the market.
That's ok... it's why we test. Me, as a test guy, am not surprised. SpaceX's mantra of build, test, rebuild, test is great! Yes, maybe a bit more costly for development, but the results speak for themselves. Where's Boeing's competitive booster? NGC's? Lockheed's?
Yeah, testing can lead to spectacular finishes, but this is no failure; lessons were learned.
Never be caught hardware poor. Boeing... shame on you. The minimum number of units is five (5):
- Murphy will take one
- Engineering bench testing will let the smoke out of another
- Environmental lab testing will consume another
- Simulation Testing 1x minimum, two (2) preferable since Murphy is still out there waiting
- Flight 1x; Two (2) is preferable... Murphy again.
So while five (5) is a minimum, an ideal is at LEAST seven (7). Seven... huuummm... a statistically relevant number... huuummmm.
"Microsoft has always been focused on enabling developers to be more productive, to achieve their ambitions, and subsequently make the world better for it."
Bull hockey! Microsoft is in BUSINESS to make MONEY! Nothing else. There clearly isn't enough cash being generated by the product to keep it breathing. There's a reason we dubbed Microsoft back in the 80's Moneysoft.
"And the fuel used by Bezos' engines isn't quite as horrid as some of the other go-juice found in the rocket industry, although the generation of the many, many..."
Really?! And just WHERE do you think the ENERGY to create that oxidizer and fuel comes from; the energy faeries?
First, one cracks water to get the O2 and H2 gas - lots and lots of energy, then one compresses the gas - lots and lots of energy, then cools the gas - lots and lots of energy, then rapidly expands it to liquefy it - very little energy use to maintain temperature, then in liquid form, pumped into cryogenically cooled storage tanks - OMG, OMG there's a lot of energy used here!
Cryogenic fuel is NOT about the environment, it's about energy content: To date, no oxidizer/fuel combination has the energy density of good old O2 and H2 burning.
I would like to see the actual energy budget for producing O2/H2 and O2/RP1. Since only the O2 portion of the O2/RP1 (Refined Kerosene) needs to be kept cryogenic, and since the O2 can be pulled straight from the atmosphere since we don't need the H2, I'd expect it to have 1/3 to 1/2 the energy needs of the O2/H2 bandwagon. And yeah, that does take into account the energy used to find, drill, pump, transport, refine and store the RP1.
Please educate yourself.
One thing that I've always had a question about with under sea optical cables is how do the repeater stations get power to do the job? One does not push 6,000 km without them.
Also, what happens when one dies or needs maintenance? Do they pull the cable up to a ship and make repairs? I would think that near impossible do to finding the cable post installation and praying it doesn't snag on something... or some creature building their house over the top of the thing.
Funny... where I'm from we call them shotguns. They are very effective in removing said geese problems. The same system is very useful for getting rid of all sorts of unwanted lifeforms. Cheep to operate, train folks to use and quite safe to transport to multiple locations.
Environmentally friendly materials for the system are available too. And the remains of the offending lifeforms are compostable... either directly or post cooking and served with a meal.
The "head" of DOTE is on his bullhorn again screaming doom. This guy does get old. And as to Agile being 'high risk', he needs to get out of his crack parlor and go see how it's actually done. There are plenty of DoD programs running this model and it works great; lower cost development and more functionality sooner than giant bloat releases.
He needs to go.
Quite frankly, Agile makes HIS people work for their pay... they whine a lot.
"Brexit means we are at last freed to obey whatever the Americans instruct us to do."
Harsh man... harsh. It's not so much as we order you, it's just we strongly recommend, that if you want to do business here, we will be rather insistent. Think of it as speaking Python, Monty Python that is, back at you with a touch of a mafioso boss: One may not like it, but at the end of the day, we all will make money and proudly fly the bird at Europe. And at the end of the day, any chance to flip off Europe can't be all that bad now can it?
Had an old XT that stopped booting at school. Same thing; a frozen drive. So while everyone was running around with their hair on fire (Lots of homework on it apparently.), I picked the drive up, it was disconnected, and whacked it on it's side against the table. Everyone froze. The blood in everyone's face left for other areas. Everyone's jaw dropped. I was amused, after all, there was nothing left to loose. I plugged it back in and turned the computer on, it spun up and booted.
"Now then, back it up and go get a NEW drive." I said and walked away.
Actually, if one is going to go to Greenland, there's no obstacle for hooking into the North American grid. Currently, only China and Brazil have larger renewable energy grids than the US, and Canada rounds out the top 10 largest producers. And with the US actually adding capacity rapidly, contrary to popular opinion in some regions, spreading the load would be ideal operationally.
To the intellectual midgets who believe doing an Apollo mission to Mars is the "Best Way" forward: PHOOEY!
Get back to the moon and us IT as a test site for all things MARS! That means equipment testing, that means space craft testing, that means habitat testing, etc!
If it works there it will work on Mars. And if it doesn't, then it's better to be 3 days, any given day of the year, away from ones home base than 22 MONTHS once a year!
These mental midgets are setting anyone who wants to try for a direct Mars shot up for FAILURE.
Boo hoo... baby got an owweee. Look. The nastiness everyone could do without. But PURPOSELY deleting bugs? Yeah, that would get my boot up side your backside.
Ignoring peoples issues? Simply having a list of bugs to be fixed and their order would address that.
Simple stuff here, so it's probably a good idea for someone with thicker skin to take on the job.