
Re: There is a question to ask here
I noticed the words "evil desires" from that letter are really very close to "thoughtcrime".
1150 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Sep 2019
Sadly, it probably comes from the fact that competent people rarely want to work for the government. It used to be that civil servant was a very respectable career, and the job security was attractive enough for top minds to devote their life to working for the community. I'm not sure if this cachet is what led to low pay, but one way or another you can now have a much better life working for a private company, so a lot of the people working for the government are those who couldn't get a job anywhere else.
A good society should pay its civil servants well. This is a true investment for the future. Along with teachers, they truly create tomorrow's quality of life.
I'm not entirely comfortable with the government telling big tech platforms that it is their duty to filter unacceptable discourse along blurry guidelines. Though at least the EU is not supposed to have a strong law protecting free speech. It's rather ironical to see the US government complain that platforms aren't doing enough to police misinformation, considering the government itself is not allowed to do it.
In principle, each game would apply to different people with their gameplay. Personally I thought Ingress's concept of creating links between portals and building up areas was way more interesting than PG, which seems to be just "attack all the gyms" with very little strategy. In particular, in Ingress there was a big incentive in visiting other cities and collecting the portal keys. I don't remember PG has anything similar, but I guess the backstory is more important.
Indeed. And they have 177 F-22. That's a quarter as much as they initially planned, because the costs were too high. The goal of 2000 units is still impressively high — it's as much as the total number of combat planes they currently have, half of which, surprisingly, seems to be F-16s:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_active_United_States_Air_Force_aircraft
I think there's no limit on how many videos you can upload, though it seems there are daily upload limits. I suppose you could upload terabytes of white noise to dick around, but they'll probably delete that and ban the account. It's almost certain that somebody tried.
Okay... I'll bite... why is it morally wrong?
I can't speak for the OP, but privacy rights is the most usual complaint. In some cases, when it involves secret technology, it can be considered theft. Just ask yourself what would be the problem if a private company was doing it for the money instead of a government.
Nobody is claiming spying is morally right — that doesn't mean they won't do it, and the fact they do it doesn't mean they will allow it against themselves. In a football match, both try to score on the opposite goal and tries to prevent the opposite team from scoring. There's no hypocrisy in that.
The decisions taken by CEOs have frequently more impact than those taken by hundreds of employees, and it can be a lot more difficult to know which are the right decisions. Some CEOs can justifiably claim that their companies have made way more money than their (considerable) total comp, directly thanks to decisions they have made. For instance, Satya Nadella has noticeably improved Microsoft after taking over from Steve Ballmer. Another example is Steve Jobs, who while being a gigantic asshole is widely considered to be responsible for Apple being the most valuable company in the world.
Of course, you have a lot of CEOs who have destroyed their companies with bad decisions — if it was straightforward to be a CEO, anybody could do it, and the pay would be much lower.
One of the most pathetic letter I received was from a film developement business. They had used to send ultra-glossy magazines, boasting the quality of their colors and their crisp detail. This one was a single black and white sheet of paper, acknowledging that they were mostly dying since everything was going digital, but that maybe we still had old films which we'd like more copies of, or perhaps even digital pictures to print, and they were fully ready to do the job. Like receiving a letter from your grandmother in the hospital saying that maybe you can visit her, whenever you have time, while there's still time...?
Claims of a device or system being secure should be considered the same as a house or building being called secure. You can work to make things more secure, but ultimately it's impossible for anything to be 100% secure, for a device to be hack-proof or for a house to be burglar-proof. And if you insist on making things even more secure, they eventually become unusable due to the restrictions you need to place on them.
Also, if the traffic from four IP addresses can put a strain on Twitter servers, then their infrastructure is on even worse state than I thought. Even if these IP addresses are on optic fibers, I'd expect the total traffic they can download to be insignificant for Twitter.
I remember playing those oldies from my youth. Very often you could not play them on a modern computer, or, frustratingly, you could play it until the single timed sequence in the game — e.g. crossing a labyrinth without being caught by enemies — which due to the increase in processor speed had to be done perfectly in the 0.1 seconds before you got caught. Yes, I mean you, Space Quest V.
Not banned, but some countries said that they had to pay the news sites. Depending on the countries and the details, they've paid up (Australia, France) or closed Google News (Spain). In Canada, it seems a new law says they have to pay to include news sites in search results, and if I understand correctly they've said they were going to filter them out completely.
Search engines already return snippets with their results, which has landed them in trouble with news sites. Results of ancillary copyright laws are mixed. It's going to be a long time before we have clarity on what should be legal, and it's the wild west yntil then