
Re: AirDrop is a weird thing
I can only assume that somebody wanted to increase engagement numbers. People with such goals don't care if the "engagement" consists in Spam or people angrily yelling at their device.
1153 publicly visible posts • joined 2 Sep 2019
Just in case you don't know the difference: Google Docs is pretty much a web-only product, so there's no problem whatsoever accessing Google Docs from a virtual desktop running on Azure; you just need a browser. The few Drive-related native apps provided by Google have no such restrictions either. However, Office is still (in part) based on heavy native applications, which Microsoft does not allow running on virtual desktops running on GCP.
I remember that if it can be shown that the infringement was deliberate, damages are tripled...? Or something like that.
Also, if Google tries to argue that their method is in fact different than that described on the patent, I suppose it might be argued that they started from the patent and changed a few details to make it different (but that's just my common sense argument, so it's probably absolutely the opposite of what's goes in a patent trial)
this gang have proved highly manipulative "The crew's tactics included phone-based social engineering".
Like you, I used to think that social engineering required high-level con skills. However, I've since learned that there are scam labor camps in South-East Asia, where people are kidnapped and forced to work on online scams: 7 Months Inside an Online Scam Labor Camp
The implication is that you can kidnap a random Chinese farmer, chain him to a desk with a bunch of phones and a script, and he'll manage to scam people online. No highly-manipulative social engineering skills needed, it's that easy.
The content streamer’s view of “fair” is like Steinway driving a customer’s new piano to the local postal sorting office and saying “Here you go: Get that to Apartment 6, 113 Main Street, thanks. Oh, and we’re only paying you five bucks, considering we’ve brought it most of the way for you.”.
Note that in this case the "post office" has entered a contract with the owner of Apartment 6, 133 Main Street, stating that they will deliver whatever is requested at no extra cost. ISP have customers, and these customers already pay for the traffic. In South Korea, that probably means they pay for optic fiber, which has no problem handling the load.
Considering Twitch apparently had the largest market share of video game streaming in South Korea, it's got to be really bad for them to decide to leave the country. Though there's also the fact that Amazon did a bunch of layoffs, which also affected Twitch. It could be that they were told to improve profitability "or else", and they are complying as best they can, even though that seems rather short-sighted.
My wife recently asked for pictures from 14 years ago. For a while, I thought we could only get them from a NAS that I disconnected 2-3 years ago for lack of use, but was still keeping in the basement. It turned out that I didn't have a power cable that would fit, and that I would have to buy one somewhere... But then she said that she had somehow posted the pictures to Facebook 8 years back, so we went back to look for that post and found that it was a link to a picasa album, now surviving in Google photos on the account of our son. So the NAS went back to the basement, still containing some unfinished research articles, my old collection of MP3s and possibly the code for my PhD thesis. We already got rid long ago of the server I bought when I was in university, which boasted a whole TB of disk, and which demonstrated its lack of usefulness by not being turned on for so long it wouldn't boot anymore.
I think you need a bronze or silver badge to use HTML, and otherwise you can't link.
The CMA had previously opted not to open an investigation during a market study, so it does not have the power to do so now.
Well that was a stupid argument. Markets change, the situation evolves. The fact that something used to be fine doesn't mean it's fine now, particularly in matters of anti trust.
Facebook will soon realize that the worse the ads are, the more people will pay!
This is why Tesla never claimed the technology was fully autonomous
O RLY?
"a Model S and Model X, at this point, can drive autonomously with greater safety than a person." — Elon Musk in 2016 (YouTube link)
Of course it solves problems. Self-driving cars have the potential to vastly reduce the number of accidents (they probably already have less accidents than human drivers, but they get more scrutiny). They also allow people to concentrate on doing more interesting things than driving in traffic, like reading or sleeping or anything they want. On average, American drivers spend two years of their life driving, which is a real waste of time.
Not really, that's the point of LSASS accepting such a credential provider in the first place. This fits the cloudy model that everything important is done through the online services, and it doesn't matter which machine you use to access them because there's nothing important on the machine itself.
X has taken action on hundreds of thousands of posts in the first month
In other words, one every eight seconds. I can only suppose that the automated systems are unable to start, the rater team has been laid off, and there is one single temp somewhere in the bowels of the company who has to take down each post manually. Which explains why 99% of the hate is still up.
I'm unconvinced that this has any chance. Criminal complaints have a much higher bar to pass to be confirmed by courts. This feels like a publicity stunt.
I think a determinant point for YouTube will be whether the script which detects the adblocker does in fact send the information back to the server. If yes, then there can be a claim of spying — it's getting information about the user, which is the domain of GDPR. If the code just prevents the videos from playing without sending anything back, then it's just code which controls how the page is displayed, part of the page requested by the user, executed by the browser controlled by the user. You might as well sue about the bandwidth costs caused by ads that you didn't request.
Looks like they really can't convince their employees to get back to the office in California. It might be different for Europe and the US — people in Europe tend to live in smaller places that do not have room for an office, but with a small commute, and Americans live in large houses with a two-hour commute on the highway.